Abstract
The atmospheric dynamo theory of the daily magnetic variations (S) has received substantial support from recent observational and theoretical work. In particular, several features of the variations, such as their remarkable enhancement close to the dip equator and other effects indicating a strong control by the main geomagnetic field, are well explained by the dynamo theory. Also the detection of ionospheric currents by instrumental rockets has confirmed an essential part of the theory.
Considerable impetus was given to their study by the acquirement of much new data on magnetic variations during the IGY-IQSY period. Additional observations in the Pacific area were obtained during the IQSY by the establishment of four island stations equipped with newly developed magnetometers. A major advance at other stations was the development of automatic standard observatories using nuclear magnetometers.
Several methods for the world-wide analysis of the S-field have been developed. A possibility now being studied is the completely automatic evaluation and construction by computers of ionospheric current charts for any day and any epoch UT.
Some theoretical and statistical papers are briefly reviewed. These include discussions of the day-to-day variability of S, seasonal changes of the S-field, the nature of the equatorial electrojet, the possibility of solar wind effects contributing to the daily variations, and the modification of the dynamo theory to take account of the possible flow of electric current from the ionosphere along magnetic lines of force in the magnetosphere.
Finally, an attempt to extend the dynamo theory of S by treating the ionosphere as a three-dimensional medium, instead of regarding it as a thin shell, has revealed that, although the relations between the horizontal components of electric field and current density in the dynamo layer are given with reasonable accuracy by the well-known layer equations, the assumption, implicit in the thin shell treatment, that the horizontal currents are non-divergent is not in fact true. Hence a revision of some earlier theoretical work on S appears necessary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alldredge, L. R.: 1967, Private communication.
Alldredge, L. R. and Fitz, J. C.: 1964, Deep-Sea Res. 11, 935.
Alldredge, L. R. and Saldukas, I.: 1966, The Automatic Standard Observatory, Techn. Bulletin, No. 31, USCGS, Washington.
Appleton, E. V. and Barnett, M. A. F.: 1925, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A109, 621.
Ashour, A. A. and Price, A. T.: 1965, Geophys. J. 10, 1.
Bartels, J.: 1960, See Landolt-Börnstein below.
Breit, G. and Tuve, M. A.: 1925, Nature 116, 357.
Brown, G. M.: 1967, Paper read at IAGA General Assembly, St. Gall.
Burrows, K. and Hall, S. H.: 1964, Nature 204, 721.
Cahill, L. H.: 1959, J. Geophys. Res. 64, 489 and 1377.
Cain, J. C., Langel, R. A., and Hendricks, S. J.: 1966, NASA Report X-612–66–305 on OGO-2 Satellite, Goddard Space Flight Center, U.S.A.
Chapman, S.: 1956, Nuovo Cim., Suppl. 4, 1385.
Chapman, S. and Bartels, J.: 1940, Geomagnetism, Oxford University Press, Ch. XXIII.
Chapman, S. and Fogle, B. T.: 1967, Paper read at IAGA General Assembly, St. Gall.
Cocks, A. C.: 1968, Ph.D. Thesis, Exeter University.
Cocks, A. C. and Price, A. T.: 1968, J. Planetary Space Sci. (in press).
Cocks, A. C. and Price, A. T.: 1969, Gerlands Beiträge zur Geophysik, No. 2/1969.
Davis, T. N., Burrows, K., and Stolarik, J. D.: 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 1845.
Davis, T. N., Stolarik, J. D., and Heppner, J. P.: 1966, J. Geomag. Geoelec. 18, 183.
DeMendonça, F.: 1965, Report on Equatorial Aeronomy, Brazil Symposium, Sao José dos Campos.
Dougherty, J. P.: 1963, J. Geophys. Res. 68, 2383.
Elvers, D. and Perkins, D.: 1964, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 45, 46.
Farley, D. T.: 1960, J. Geophys. Res. 65, 869.
Forbush, S. E., Casaverde, M., and Schmucker, U.: 1967, Annual Rep. for 1955–56, Dept. Terr. Magn., Carnegie Inst., Washington, 11.
Fougère, P. F.: 1963, J. Geophys. Res. 68, 1131.
Graham, G.: 1724, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A32, 96.
Gupta, J. C.: 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 1583.
Hall, M. N. and Mason, C. S.: 1962, Nature 195, 356.
Hasegawa, M.: 1936a, Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo 12, 88.
Hasegawa, M.: 1936b, Prod. Imp. Acad. Tokyo 12, 227.
Heaviside, O.: 1902, Encyclopedia Britannica (10th ed.) 33, 213.
Hines, C. O.: 1966, J. Geophys. Res. 71, 1453.
Hirono, M. and Kitamura, T. I.: 1956, J. Geomag. Geoelec., Kyoto 8, pp 9.
Hirono, M., Maeda, H., and Kato, S.: 1959, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys. 15, 146.
Hobbs, B. A. and Price, A. T.: 1968, paper in preparation.
Hunter, A. N. and Osborne, D. G.: 1965, Report on Equatorial Aeronomy, Brazil Symposium, (ed. by F. de Mendonça), p. 399.
Hutton, R.: 1967, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys. 29, 1411, 1429.
Kato, S.: 1956, J. Geomag. Geoelec., Kyoto 8, 24.
Kato, S.: 1957, J. Geomag. Geoelec., Kyoto 9, 107.
Kennelly, A. E.: 1902, Elec. World Eng. 39, 473.
Kim, J. S. and Kim, H. Y.: 1962, Nature 196, 630.
Kreil, K.: 1839, Ann. Physik 46, 443.
Lamb, H.: 1883, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A174, 519.
Landolt-Börnstein: 1960, Zahlenwerte und Funktionen aus Phys. Chem. u.s.w., III: Astronomie und Geophysics, p. 750.
Larsen, J.: 1966, Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA.
Larsen, J. and Cox, C.: 1966, J. Geophys. Res. 71, 4441.
Maeda, H.: 1955, J. Geomag. Geoelec., Kyoto 7, 121.
Maeda, H.: 1957, J. Geomag. Geolec., Kyoto 9, 86.
Maeda, H.: 1966, J. Geomag. Geoelec. 18, 173.
Maeda, K.-I.: 1965, Report on Equatorial Aeronomy, Brazil, 417.
Maeda, K.-I. and Murata, H.: 1965, Rpt Ionospheric Space Res., Japan 19, 272.
Mason, R. G.: 1962, Ttans. Am. Geophys. Union 44, 40.
Matsushita, S. and Maeda, H.: 1965, J. Geophys. Res. 70, 2535.
Mayaud, P. N.: 1960, Ann. Geophys. 16, 270.
Mayaud, P. N.: 1967, Atlas of Indices K, IAGA Bulletin No. 21, 66.
Mead, G. D.: 1964, J. Geophys. Res. 69, 1181.
Mishin, V. M., Bazashapov, A. D., Nemtsova, E. I., and Platonov, M. L.: 1966, Geomagnetic Researches, Section III, IGY Program, No. 8, 5 and 23.
Mitra, A. P.: 1967, IQSY Notes No. 20, 11.
Nagata, T.: 1967, Private communication.
Nagata, T. and Kokobun, S.: 1962, Rpt Ionospheric Space Res., Japan 16, 256.
Nelson, J. H.: 1967, Private communication.
Ogbuehi, P. O. and Onwumechilli, A.: 1965, J. Geophys. Res. 70, 4909.
Ogbuehi, P. O., Onwumechilli, A. and Ifedili, S. O.: 1967, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys. 29, 149.
Osborne, D. G.: 1962, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys. 24, 491.
Osborne, D. G.: 1964, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys. 26, 1094.
Osborne, D. G.: 1966, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys. 28, 1966.
Price, A. T.: 1965, Report on Equatorial Aeronomy, Brazil, 415.
Price, A. T.: 1967, Physics of Geomagnetic Phenomena (ed. by Matsushita and Campbell), Academic Press, Ch. II, p. 235.
Price, A. T.: 1968, Geophys. J. 15, 93.
Price, A. T. and Stone, D. J.: 1964, Annals IGY 35, 65.
Price, A. T. and Wilkins, G. A.: 1963, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A256, 31.
Schuster, A.: 1889, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A180, 467.
Singer, S. F., Maple, E. and Bowen, W. A.: 1951, J. Geophys. Res. 56, 265.
Stewart, B.: 1882, Encyclopaedia Britannica (9th ed.) 16, 159.
Sugiura, M. and Hagan, M. P.: 1967, Scientific Report NSF GA-478, Dept. of Atmos. Sci., Univ. of Washington.
VanSabben, D.: 1966, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys. 28, 965.
Wagner, Chr.-Ulr.: 1968a, Planetary Space Sci. 16, 353.
Wagner, Chr.-Ulr.: 1968b, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys. 30, 579.
Wescott, E. M., DeWitt, R. N., and Akasofu, S-I.: 1963, J. Geophys. Res. 68, 6377.
Wiese, H.: 1951, Z. Meteorol. 5, 373.
Wilkes, M. V.: 1962, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys. 24, 73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Price, A.T. Daily variations of the geomagnetic field. Space Sci Rev 9, 151–197 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00215632
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00215632