Skip to main content
Log in

Stability analysis of two-dimensional models of quiescent prominences

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using the MHD energy principle of Bernstein et al. (1958) we develop a formalism in order to analyze the stability properties of two-dimensional magnetostatic plasma equilibria. We apply this to four models of quiescent prominences, namely those of Menzel (1951), Dungey (1953), Kippenhahn and Schlüter (1957), and finally Lerche and Low (1980). For the observed parameter range, all models are stable and they explain reasonably well the reported flare-initiated oscillations in quiescent prominences. We also investigate other parameters regions, which may be relevant in some stellar atmospheres. It is found that, with the exception of the Kippenhahn and Schlüter model, all models become unstable. The instabilities that occur show simultaneously several features of well-known MHD-instabilities. However, an unequivocal assignment of the instabilities to specific instability prototypes is not possible. Our formalism allows one to investigate not only more realistic prominence equilibria, but also arbitrary one- and two-dimensional static ideal MHD-equilibria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anzer, U.: 1969, Solar Phys. 8, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashkirtsev, V. S. and Mashnich, G. P.: 1984, Solar Phys. 91, 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I. B., Frieman, E. A., Kruskal, M. D., and Kulsrud, R. M.: 1958, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A244, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.: 1958, Astrophys. J. 128, 646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dungey, J. W.: 1953, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 113, 180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galindo, T. J. and Schindler, K.: 1984, Astrophys. J. 277, 422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hain, K., Lüst, R., and Schlüter, A.: 1957, Z. Astrophys. 43, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies, J. T. and Orrall, F. Q.: 1963, Astrophys. J. 137, 1232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kippenhahn, R. and Schlüter, A.: 1957, Z. Astrophys. 43, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleczek, J. and Kuperus, M.: 1969, Solar Phys. 6, 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laval, G., Mercier, C., and Pellat, R.: 1965, Nucl. Fusion 5, 156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerche, I. and Low, B. C.: 1980, Solar Phys. 67, 229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, J. L.: 1977, Astron. Astrophys. 60, 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, J. L.: 1978, Astron. Astrophys. 64, 247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, B. C.: 1975, Astrophys. J. 197, 251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, B. C.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 246, 538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, B. C. and Wu, S. T.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 248, 335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, B. C., Hundhausen, A. J., and Zweibel, E. G.: 1983, Phys. Fluids 26, 2731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malville, J. P., Hood, A. W., and Priest, E. R.: 1984, Solar Phys. 92, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, D. H.: 1951, Proc. Conf. on Dynamics of Ionised Media, London.

  • Migliuolo, S.: 1982, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 3462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailovskii, A. B.: 1974, Theory of Plasma Instabilities, Volume 2, Consultants B, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa, Y. and Mc Kim Malville, J.: 1969, Solar Phys. 9, 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osherovich, V. A.: 1983, Astrophys. J. 271, 847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osherovich, V. A.: 1985, Astrophys. J. 297, 314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, H. E. and Smith, S. F.: 1966, Astron. J. 71, 197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai, J. and Nishikawa, K.-L: 1983, Solar Phys. 88, 241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, K., Birn, J., and Janicke, I.: 1983, Solar Phys. 87, 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, W., Bobeldijk, C., and de Vries, R. F.: 1969, Plasma Phys. 11, 495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafranov, V. D.: 1957, J. Nucl. Energy II 5, 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafranov, V. D.: 1959, Plasma Physics and the Problem of Controlled Thermonuclear Reactions, Vol. II, p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, D. S.: 1978, ‘Physics of Solar Prominences’, IAU Colloq. 44, 307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayler, R. J.: 1957a, Proc. Phys. Soc. London B70, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayler, R. J.: 1957b, Proc. Phys. Soc. London B70, 1049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kampen, N. G. and Felderhof, B. U.: 1967, Theoretical Methods in Plasma Physics, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiehr, E., Stellmacher, G., and Balthasar, H.: 1984, Solar Phys. 94, 285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz, O. C.: 1977, The Finite Element Method in Engineering Science, London.

  • Zweibel, E. G.: 1982, Astrophys. J. 258, L53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweibel, E. G. and Hundhausen, A. J.: 1982, Solar Phys. 76, 261.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trejo, J.G. Stability analysis of two-dimensional models of quiescent prominences. Sol Phys 108, 265–313 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00214166

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00214166

Keywords

Navigation