Skip to main content
Log in

Cloud-radiation feedbacks in a general circulation model and their dependence on cloud modelling assumptions

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The general circulation model (GCM) used in this study includes a prognostic cloud scheme and a rather detailed radiation scheme. In a preceding paper, we showed that this model was more sensitive to a global perturbation of the sea surface temperatures than most other models with similar physical parametrization. The experiments presented here show how this feature might depend on some of the cloud modelling assumptions. We have changed the temperature at which the water clouds are allowed to become ice clouds and analyzed separately the feedbacks associated with the variations of cloud cover and cloud radiative properties. We show that the feedback effect associated with cloud radiative properties is positive in one case and negative in the other. This can be explained by the elementary cloud radiative forcing and has implications concerning the use of the GCMs for climate sensitivity studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cess RD, Potter GL (1988) A methodology for understanding and intercomparing atmospheric climate feedback processes in general circulation models. J Geophys Res 93(D):8305–8314

    Google Scholar 

  • Cess RD, Potter GL, Blanchet JP, Boer GJ, Del Genio AD, Dé-equé M, Dymnikov V, Galin V, Gates WL, Ghan SJ, Kiehl JT, Lacis AA, Le Treut H, Li ZX, Liang XZ, McAvaney BJ, Meleshko VP, Mitchell JFB, Morcette JJ, Randall DA, Rikus L, Roeckner E, Royer JF, Schlese U, Sheinin DA, Slingo A, Sokolov AP, Taylor KE, Washington WM, Wetherald RT, Yagai I, Zhang MH (1990) Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models. J Geophys Res 95(D) 16601–16615

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise E, Roeckner E (1990) The performance of physically based cloud schemes in general circulation models. Beitr Phys Atmosph 63:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Trent H, Li ZX (1988) Using Meteosat data to validate a prognostic cloud generation scheme. Atmos Res 21:273–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Treut H, Li ZX (1991) Sensitivity of an atmospheric general circulation model to prescribed SST changes: feedback effects associated with the simulation of cloud optical properties. Clim Dyn 5:175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Li ZX, Le Trent H (1989) Comparison of GCM results with data from operational meteorological satellites. Ocean-Air Interactions 1:221–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Li ZX, Le Trent H (1990) Sensitivity analysis with a 1-D climate model. Chinese J Atmos Sci 14:72–82 (Chinese version); 87–99 (English version)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JFB, Senior CA, Ingram WJ (1989) CO2 and climate: a missing feedback?. Nature 341:132–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt CMR (1989) The role of cloud microphysics in high-cloud feedback effects on climate change. Nature 341:428–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan V, Cess RD, Harrison EF, Minnis P, Barkstrom BR, Ahmad E, Hartmann D (1989) Cloud-radiative forcing and climate; results from the earth radiation budget experiment. Science 243:57–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeckner E, Schlese U, Biercamp J, Loewe P (1987) Cloud optical depth feedbacks and climate modelling. Nature 329:138–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadourny R, Laval K (1984) January and July performance of the LMD general circulation model. In: Berger A, Nicolis C (eds) New perspectives in climate modelling. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger ME, Mitchell JFB (1987) Climate model simulations of the equilibrium climatic response to increased carbon dioxide. Rev Geophys 25:760–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RNB (1990) A scheme for predicting layer clouds and their water content in a general circulation model. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 116:435–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville RCJ, Remer LA (1984) Cloud optical thickness feedbacks in the CO2 climate problem. J Geophys Res 89(D): 9668–9672

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville RCJ, Iacobellis S (1987) Cloud-radiation interactions: effects of cirrus optical thickness feedbacks. J Meteor Soc Japan special issue: short and medium range numerical weather prediction, Matsuno T (ed). pp. 177-185

  • Starr DO'C, Cox SK (1985) Cirrus clouds. part I: a cirrus cloud model. J Atmos Sci 42:2663–2681

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens GL, Tsay SC, Stackhouse PW, Flatau PJ (1990) The relevance of the microphysical and radiative properties of cirrus clouds to climate and climate feedbacks. J Atmos Sci 47:1742–1753

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundqvist H (1981) Prediction of stratiform clouds: Results of a 5-day forecast with a global model. Tellus 33:242–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherald RT, Manabe S (1988) Cloud feedback processes in a general circulation model. J Atmos Sci 45:1397–1415

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson CA, Mitchell JFB (1987) A doubled CO2 climate sensitivity experiment with a global climate model including a simple ocean. J Geophys Res 92(D): 13 315–13 343

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu W, Sèze G, Le Treut H, Desbois M (1991) Comparison of radiance fields observed from satellite and simulated by the LMD general circulation model. Dyn Atmos Oceans 16:147–165

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, ZX., Le Treut, H. Cloud-radiation feedbacks in a general circulation model and their dependence on cloud modelling assumptions. Climate Dynamics 7, 133–139 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00211155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00211155

Keywords

Navigation