Skip to main content
Log in

Complete and precise characterization of marker chromosomes by application of microdissection in prenatal diagnosis

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A straightforward and extremely efficient reverse chromosome painting technique is described which allows the rapid and unequivocal identification of any cytogenetically unclassifiable chromosome rearrangement. This procedure is used to determine the origin of unknown marker chromosomes found at prenatal diagnosis. After microdissection of the marker chromosome and amplification of the dissected fragment by a degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to aberrant and normal metaphase chromosomes with the marker-derived probe pool is performed. With this strategy, marker chromosomes present in amniotic fluid samples were successfully identified in three cases. The origin of the supernumerary markers was ascertained as deriving from 3p(p12-cen), 18p(pter-cen) and 9p(p12-cen), respectively. Since a specific FISH signal on chromosomes can be obtained within 2 working days using a probe generated without any pretreatment from one chromosomal fragment only and without additional image processing devices, this technique is considered to be highly suitable for routine application in pre- and postnatal cytogenetic analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blennow E, Telenius H, Larson C, Vos D de, Bajalica S, Ponder BAJ, Nordenskjöld M (1992) Complete characterization of a large marker chromosome by reverse and forward chromosome painting. Hum Genet 90:371–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Blennow E, Annerén G, Bui T-H, Berggren E, Asadi E, Nordenskjöld M (1993) Characterization of supernumerary ring marker chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Am J Hum Genet 53:433–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckton KE, Spowart G, Newton MS, Evans HJ (1985) Forty-four probands with an additional “marker” chromosome. Hum Genet 69:353–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Callen DF, Eyre HJ, Ringenbergs ML, Freemantle CJ, Woodroffe P, Haan EA (1991) Chromosomal origin of small ring marker chromosomes in man: characterization by molecular genetics. Am J Hum Genet 48:769–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter NP, Ferguson-Smith MA, Perryman MT, Telenius H, Pelmear AH, Leversha MA, Glancy MT, Wood SL, Cook K, Dyson HM, Ferguson-Smith ME, Willat LR (1992) Reverse chromosome painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes in clinical cytogenetics. J Med Genet 29:299–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng S-D, Spinner NB, Zackai EH, Knoll JHM (1994) Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of inverted duplicated chromosomes 15 form 11 patients. Am J Hum Genet 55:753–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung SW, Crane JP, Beaver H (1990) Correlation between phenotypic expression of de novo marker chromosomes and genomic organization using replicational banding. Prenat Diagn 10:717–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng HX, Yoshiura K, Dirks RW, Harada N, Hirota T, Tsukamoto K, Jinno Y, Niikawa N (1992) Chromosome-band-specific painting: chromosome in situ suppression hybridization using PCR products from a microdissected chromosome band as a probe pool. Hum Genet 89:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan X-Y, Trent JM, Meltzer PS (1993) Generation of band-specific painting probes from a single microdissected chromosome. Hum Mol Genet 2:1117–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • ISCN (1985) An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao FT, Yu JW (1991) Chromosome microdisseection and cloning in human genome and genetic disease analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:1844–1848

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn B, Sedlacek Z, Manca A, Kioschis P, Konecki D, Lehrach H, Poustka A (1992) A strategy for the selection of transcribed sequences in the Xq28 region. Hum Mol Genet 1:235–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafage-Pochitaloff-Huvale M, Shaw A, Dessarps F, Mannoni P, Fradelizi D, Wollman EE (1989) The gene for thioredoxin maps on the short arm of chromosome 3 at bands 3p11-p12. FEBS Lett 255:89–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengauer C, Eckelt A, Weith A, Endlich N, Ponelies N, Lichter P, Greulich KO, Cremer T (1991) Painting of defined chromosomal regions by in situ suppression hybridization of libraries from laser-microdissection chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 56:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüdecke H-J, Senger G, Claussen U, Horsthemke B (1989) Cloning of defined regions of the human genome by microdissection of banded chromosomes and enzymatic amplification. Nature 338:348–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani I, Sacchi N, Darfler M, Nisson PE, Tornaghi R, Fuhrmann-Conti AM (1993) Identification of the chromosome 14 origin of a C-negative marker associated with a 14q32 deletion by chromosome painting. Clin Genet 43:180–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer PS, Guan X-Y, Burgess A, Trent JM (1992) Rapid generation of region specific probes by chromosome microdissection and their application. Nature Genet 1:24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohashi H, Wakkui K, Ogawa K, Okano T, Niikawa N, Fukushima Y (1994) A stable acentric marker chromosome: possible existence of an intercalary ancient centromere at distal 8p. Am J Hum Genet 55:1202–1208

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta T, Tohma T, Soejima H, Fukushima Y, Nagai T, Yoshiura K, Jinno Y, Niikawa N (1993) The origin of cytologically unidentifiable chromosome abnormalities: six cases ascertained by targeted chromosome-band painting. Hum Genet 92:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Plattner R, Heerema NA, Yurov YB, Palmer CG (1993) Efficient identification of marker chromosomes in 27 patients by stepwise hybridization with alpha-satellite DNA probes. Hum Genet 91:131–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch A, Pfeiffer RA, Trautmann U, Liehr T, Rott HD, Ulmer R (1992) A study of ten small supernumerary (marker) chromosomes identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Clin Genet 42:84–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs ES, Van Hemel JO, Den Hollander JC, Jahoda MGJ (1987) Marker chromosomes in a series of 10,000 prenatal diagnosis: cytogenetic and follow-up studies. Prenat Diagn 7:81–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalenghe F, Turco E, Edströ J-E, Pirrotta V, Melli M (1981) Microdissection and cloning of DNA from a specific region of Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes. Chromosoma 82:205–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinzel A (1984) Catalogue of unbalanced chromosome aberrations in man. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbach P, Djalali M, Hansmann I, Kattner E, Meisel-Stociek M, Probeck HD, Schmidt A, Wolf M (1983) The genetic significance of accessory bisatellited marker chromosomes. Hum Genet 65:155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagle DA, Swaroop M, Lovett M, Collins FS (1993) Magneticbead capture of expressed sequences encoded within large genomic segments. Nature 361:751–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Telenius H, Carter NP, Bebb CE, Nordenskjöld M, Ponder BA, Tunnacliffe A (1992a) Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate rimer. Genomics 13:718–725

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Telenius H, Pelmear AH, Tunnacliffe A, Carter NP, Behmel A, Ferguson-Smith MA, Nordenskjöld M, Pfragner R, Ponder BAJ (1992b) Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes. Genes Chromosome Cancer 4:257–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonissen KF, Wells JRE (1991) Isolation and characterization of human thioredoxin-encoding genes. Gene 102:221–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Viersbach R, Schwanitz G, Nöthen MM (1994) Delineation of marker chromosomes by reverse chromosome painting using only a small number of DOP-PCR amplified microdissected chromosomes. Hum Genet 93:663–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton D (1991) De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet 49:995–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb GC, Krummins EJM, Eichenbaum SZ, Voullaire LE, Earle E, Choo KH (1989) Non C-banding variants in some normal families might be homogeneously staining regions. Hum Genet 82:59–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokoi H, Hadano S, Kogi M, Kang X, Wakasa K, Ikeda JE (1994) Isolation of expressed sequences encoded by the human Xq terminal portion using microclone probes generated by laser microdissection. Genomics 20:404–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Hartz J, Xu Y, Gemmile RM, Korenberg JR, Patterson D, Kao FT (1992) Isolation, characterization, and regional mapping of microclones from a human chromosome 21 library. Am J Hum Genet 51:263–272

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller-Navia, J., Nebel, A. & Schleiermacher, E. Complete and precise characterization of marker chromosomes by application of microdissection in prenatal diagnosis. Hum Genet 96, 661–667 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210295

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210295

Keywords

Navigation