Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between salinity and efficient water use

  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between salinity and water use efficiency is highly dependent upon which definition of water use efficiency is used. The two common definitions, yield per unit evapotranspiration and yield per unit applied water, both have significant deficiencies and can lead to erroneous conclusions. Thus, the analysis of efficient use of saline waters invokes a broader analysis than merely computing water use efficiency. An array of models is available to simulate the effects of various irrigation management strategies with saline waters. Based on results computed from these models, which consider the osmotic and matric potential effects on plant growth, strategies can be developed to effectively use saline waters in crop production. The cyclic strategy of using waters of different salinities can effectively be used in maintaining crop rotations which include both salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant crops. The major deficiency of the models is that they do not account for the effects of water quality on soil physical conditions with consequent effects on crop production. Indeed, the most limiting factor in use of saline waters on soils may be deterioration of soil physical conditions. The deterioration of soil physical conditions does not result from using the high-salinity waters per se but from subsequent rainfall or low salinity waters. Thus far the emphasis on using saline waters on crop production has centered on yields and less attention has been given to the long-term consequences on soil physical conditions. This factor requires further research and should be a focus of attention in future experiments. Relatively high saline water tables can be maintained without drainage if a non-saline source of water is available, and irrigation amounts can be controlled. This strategy might invoke the necessity for shifting irrigation systems from surface to pressurized systems. Eventually, some salt must be removed from the system. It is probably more efficient to allow it to become very concentrated and remove small volumes to be disposed of in some manner rather than apply it to productive land.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beese F, Horton R, Wierenga PJ (1982) Growth and yield response of chile pepper to trickle irrigation. Agron J 74:556

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford S, Letey J (1993 a) Water table and irrigation scheduling on cotton: Simulation effects. Irrig Sci (in press)

  • Bradford S, Letey J (1993 b) Cyclic and blending strategies for using saline and non-saline waters for irrigation. Irrig Sci (in press)

  • Cardon GE, Letey J (1992) A soil-based model for irrigation and soil salinity management. I. Tests of plant water uptake calculations. Soil Sci Soc Am J (in press)

  • Childs SW, Hanks RJ (1975) Model of soil salinity effects on crop growth. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 39:617

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis KD (1983) Trickle irrigation of cotton in California. Proc Western Cotton Prod Conference 9–11 August 1983 Las Cruces NM p 34

  • Dinar A, Letey J, Vaux HJ Jr (1986) Optimal ratios of saline and non-saline irrigation waters for crop production. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:440

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey LA (1972) Water-yield relations for non-forage crops. J Irrig Drain Div Proc ASCE 98:107

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes DW, Sharma RL, Henderson DW (1984) Developing the resource potential of a shallow water table. Calif Water Resources Center, Contribution No. 188, p 133

  • Grimes DW, Dickens WL, Anderson WD (1969) Functions for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) production from irrigation and nitrogen fertilization variables. II. Yield components and quality characteristics. Agron J 61:773

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes DW, Yamata H, Dickens WL (1969) Functions for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) production from irrigation and nitrogen fertilization variables. Yield and evapotranspiration. Agron J 61:763

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks RJ (1983) Yield and water-use relationships: An overview. In: Taylor HM, Jordan WR, Sinclair TR (eds) Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, p 393

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks RJ (ed) (1982) Predicting crop production as related to drought stress under irrigation. Utah State Univ Research Rpt No 65, Logan, UT, p 367

  • Hanks RJ, Retta A (1980) Water use and yield relations for alfalfa. Utah Agric Expt Sta Bull 506

  • Hanks RJ, Gardner HR, Florian RL (1969) Plant growth-evapotranspiration relations for several crops in the Central Great Plains. Agron J 61:30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks RJ, Sullivan TE, Hunsaker VE (1977) Corn and alfalfa production as influenced by irrigation and salinity. Soil Sci Sci Am J 41:606

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson BR, Kite WW (1984) Irrigation scheduling under saline water tables. Trans ASAE 27:1430

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman GJ, van Genuchten MTh (1983) Soil properties and efficient water use: water management for salinity control. In: Taylor HM, Jordan WR, Sinclair TR (eds) Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, p 393–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Dinar A (1986) Simulated crop-water production functions for several crops when irrigated with saline waters. Hilgardia 54:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Knapp K, Solomon K (1990) Crop-water production functions under saline conditions. In: Tanji KK (ed) Agricultural salinity assessment and management. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 71. Am Soc Civil Engineers, New York, p 305–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Dinar A, Knapp KC (1985) Crop-water production function model for saline irrigation waters. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Vaux HJ, Feinerman E (1984) Optimum crop-water application as affected by uniformity of water infiltration. Agron J 76:435

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiri A, Frenkel H, Mantell A (1992) Cotton response to water and salinity under sprinkler and drip irrigation. Agron J 84:44

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiri A, Shalhevet J, Stolzy LH, Sinai G, Steinhardt R (1986) Managing multi-source irrigation water of different salinities for optimum crop production. BARD Tech Rpt No 1–402–81, Volcani Center, Bet-Dagan, Israel, p 172

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller DE, Hang AN (1982) Deficit, high-frequency sprinkler irrigation of wheat. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:386

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimah MN, Hanks RJ (1973a) Model for estimating soil water, plant, and atmospheric interrelations: I. Description and sensitivity. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 37:522

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimah MN, Hanks RJ (1973b) Model for estimating soil water, plant, and atmospheric interrelations: II. Field test of model. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 37:528

    Google Scholar 

  • Power JF, Bond JJ, Sellner WA, Olson HM (1973) The effect of supplemental water on barley and corn production in a sub-humid region. Agron J 65:464

    Google Scholar 

  • Rains DW, Goyal S, Weyrack R, Lauchli A (1987) Saline drainage water reuse in a cotton rotation system. Calif Agric 41:24

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades JD (1987) Use of saline water for irrigation. Water Qual Bull 12:14

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades JD (1984) Use of saline water for irrigation. Calif Agric 38:42

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammis TW, Hanson EG, Barnes CE, Fuehring HD, Gregory EJ, Hooks RF, Howell TA, Finkner MD (1979) Consumptive use and yields of crops in New Mexico. Tech. Completion Rpt Proj No B-054-NMEX. New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute, Box 3167, Las Cruces, NM 88003

    Google Scholar 

  • Shainberg I, Letey J (1984) Response of soils to sodic and saline conditions. Hilgardia 52:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Shainberg I, Singer MJ (1990) Soil response to saline and sodic conditions. In: Tanji KK (ed) Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No 71. Amer Soc Civil Engineers, New York, p 91

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalhevet J (1991) Using water of marginal quality for crop production: major issues. In: Shalhevet J, Changming L, Yuexian X (eds) Water use efficiency in agriculture. Proceedings of the binational China-Israel Workshop, Beijing, China, Preil Publ Rehobot, Israel, p 17

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalhevet J (1984) Management of irrigation with brackish water. In: Shainberg I, Shalhevet J (eds) Soil salinity and irrigation. Ecol Studies 51. Springer, Heidelberg, p 298

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalhevet J, Shimihi D, Meir T (1983) Potato irrigation requirements in a hot climate using sprinkler and drip methods. Agron J 75:13

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon KH (1985) Water-salinity-production functions. Trans ASAE 28:1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JI, Danielson RE, Hanks RJ, Jackson EB, Hagan RM, Pruitt WO, Franklin WT, Riley JT (1977) Optimizing crop production through control of water and salinity levels in the soil. Utah Water Lab TRWG 151-1, Logan, UT, p 191

  • Torres JS, Hanks RJ (1989) Modeling water table contributions to crop evapotranspiration. Irrig Sci 10:265

    Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten MTh (1987) A numerical model for water and solute movement in and below the root zone. Research Rpt 121, US-DA-ARS, U. S. Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrick AW (1983) Interrelationships of irrigation uniformity terms. J Irrig Drain Div ASCE 109:317

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Letey, J. Relationship between salinity and efficient water use. Irrig Sci 14, 75–84 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208400

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208400

Keywords

Navigation