Skip to main content
Log in

MR imaging of eosinophilic granuloma: report of 11 cases

  • Articles
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The findings in 11 patients with histologically proven eosinophilic granuloma (EG) examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are described. In contrast with the variable appearance of EG on conventional radiography and computed tomography (CT), relatively constant features — intermediate to high signal intensity on T1-weighting, high signal intensity on T2-weighting, marked enhancement — were found on MRI. MRI was superior to other imaging methods in demonstrating bone marrow involvement and any accompanying soft tissue mass or inflammation. Intermediate to high signal intensity on Tl-weighting and marked contrast enhancement could not be “explained” by histological findings. Prediction of the evolutionary phase of EG by MRI remains questionable because of the phase I (proliferative) histology of all 11 lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aoki S, Sasaki Y, Machida T, Tanioka H (1990) Contrast-enhanced MR images in patients with meningioma. AJNR 11:935

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baber WW, Numaguchi Y, Nadell JM, Culicchia F, Robinson AE (1987) Eosinophilic granuloma of the cervical spine without vertebrae plana. J Comput Assist Tomogr 11:346

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caresio JF, McMillan JH, Batnitzky S (1991) Coexistent intra- and extracranial mass lesions: an unusual manifestation of histiocytosis X. AJNR 12:82

    Google Scholar 

  4. David R, Oria RA, Kumar R, Singleton EB, Lindell MM, Shirkhoda A, Madewell JE (1989) Radiologic features of eosinophilic granuloma of bone. AJR 153:1021

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haggstrom JA, Brown JC, Marsh PW (1988) Eosinophilic granuloma of the spine: MR demonstration. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12:344

    Google Scholar 

  6. Helms CA, Jeffrey RB, Wing VW (1987) Computed tomography and plain film appearance of a bony sequestration: significance and differential diagnosis. Skeletal Radiol 16:117

    Google Scholar 

  7. Immenkamp M (1985) Das eosinophile Granulom der Wirbelsäule. Z Orthop 123:227

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee SH, Rao KCVG (1990) Cranial MRI and CT, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 178

    Google Scholar 

  9. Makley TJ, Carter JR (1986) Eosinophilic granuloma of bone. Clin Orthop 204:37

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mirra JM (1989) Bone tumors: clinical, radiologic and pathologic correlation. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 1032

    Google Scholar 

  11. Murayama S, Numaguchi Y, Robinson AE, Richardson DE (1988) Magnetic resonance imaging of calvarial eosinophilic granuloma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12:251

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reiser M, Rupp N, Stetter E (1983) Erfahrungen bei der NMR-Tomographie des Skelettsystems. ROFO 139:365

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schmelzeisen H (1988) Das eosinophile Granulom. Akt Traumatol 18:67

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stull MA, Kransdorf MJ, Devaney KO (1992) Langerhans cell histiocytosis of bone. Radiographics 12:801

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thijn CJP, Martijn A, Postma A, Molenaar WM (1990) Case report 615. Skeletal Radiol 19:309

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Schepper, A.M.A., Ramon, F. & Van Marck, E. MR imaging of eosinophilic granuloma: report of 11 cases. Skeletal Radiol. 22, 163–166 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00206146

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00206146

Key words

Navigation