Summary
The positions of the centromeres of all 46 human chromosomes were analysed in three dimensional reconstructions of electron micrographs of 10 serially sectioned unpretreated human male fibroblast cells. The reconstructions show that the spatial positioning of the chromosomes during division is not random. The centromeres were arranged on a metaphase plate that was ellipsoidal and that tended to be flat. The distance of centromeres from the centre of the mitotic figure was correlated with chromosome size; small chromosomes tended to be central in all the metaphases. Large chromosomes were more peripheral, especially in cells that were more advanced in mitosis. Thus, there is a tendency for larger chromosomes to move outwards as metaphase advances. In many cells, the A group centromeres were overdispersed, whereas G group centromeres tended to be clustered. The acrocentric chromosomes (D and G groups) also tended to be clustered when analysed together, probably reflecting associations in nucleoli at the previous interphase. The results show that chromosome disposition is non-random and that it changes during division.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bajer A (1959) Change of length and volume of mitotic chromosomes in living cells. Hereditas 45:579–596
Bennett MD (1984) Towards a general model for spatial law and order in nuclear and karyotypic architecture. Chromosomes Today 8:190–202
Borden J, Manuelidis L (1988) Movement of the X chromosome in epilepsy. Science 242:1687–1691
Chaly N, Brown DL (1989) The prometaphase configuration and chromosome order in early mitosis. J Cell Sci 91:325–335
Comings DE (1968) The rationale for an ordered arrangement of chromatin in the interphase nucleus. Am J Hum Genet 20: 440–460
Comings DE (1980) Arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus. Hum Genet 53:131–143
Conover WJ (1980) Practical nonparametric statistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Cremer T, Cremer C, Baumann H, Luedtke EA, Sperling K, Teuber V, Zorn C (1982) Rabl's model of the interphase chromosome arrangement tested in Chinese hamster cells by premature chromosome condensation and laser-UV-microbeam experiments. Hum Genet 60:46–56
Cremer T, Remm B, Kharboush I, Jauch A, Wienberg J, Stelzer E, Cremer C (1991) Non-isotopic in situ hybridization and digital image analysis of chromosomes in mitotic and interphase cells. Rev Eur Technol Biomed 13:50–54
Dekken H van, Voort HTM van der, Brakenhoff GJ, Bauman JGJ (1990) Three-dimensional reconstruction of pericentromeric (1Q12) DNA and ribosomal RNA sequences in HL60 cells after double-target in situ hybridization and confocal microscopy. Cytometry 11:579–585
Diaconis P, Efron B (1983) Computer-intensive methods in statistics. Sci Am 248:96–108
Driscoll CJ, Darvey NL, Barber HN (1971) Mode of action of the pairing limitation gene in wheat (Triticum aestivum, 6 x). Chromosomes Today 3:86–92
Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Statist 7:1–26
Emmerich P, Loos P, Jauch A, Hopman AHN, Wiegant J, Higgins MJ, White BN, Ploeg M van der, Cremer C, Cremer T (1989) Double in situ hybridization in combination with digital image analysis — a new approach to study interphase chromosome topography. Exp Cell Res 181:126–140
Feldman M, Mello-Sampayo T, Sears ER (1966) Somatic association in Triticum aestivum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 56:1192–1199
Ferguson-Smith MA, Handmaker SD (1963) The association of satellited chromosomes with specific chromosomal regions in cultured somatic cells. Ann Hum Genet 27:143–156
Hens L, Kirsch-Volders M, Verschaeve L, Susanne C (1982) The central localization of small and early replicating chromosomes in human diploid metaphase figures. Hum Genet 60:249–256
Heslop-Harrison JS, Bennett MD (1983) The position of centromeres on the somatic metaphase plate of grasses. J Cell Sci 64: 163–177
Heslop-Harrison JS, Bennett MD (1984) Chromosome order — possible implications for development. J Embryol Exp Morphol 83:51–73
Heslop-Harrison JS, Bennett MD (1990) Nuclear architecture in plants. Trends Genet 6:401–405
Heslop-Harrison JS, Leitch AR, Schwarzacher T, Smith JB, Atkinson MD, Bennett MD (1989) The volumes and morphology of human chromosomes in mitotic reconstructions. Hum Genet 84:27–34
Hyams JS, Brinkley BR (1989) Mitosis — molecules and mechanisms. Academic Press, London
Kirsch-Volders M, Hens L, Susanne C (1980) Telomere and centromere association tendencies in the human male metaphase complement. Hum Genet 54:69–77
Manuelidis L (1985) Individual interphase chromosome domains revealed by in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 71:288–293
Manuelidis L, Borden J (1988) Reproducible compartmentalization of individual chromosome domains in human CNS cell revealed by in situ hybridization and three-dimensional reconstruction. Chromosoma 96:397–410
Mitelman F, Heim S (1990) Nonrandom chromosome changes in human cancer and leukemia. Chromosomes Today 10:169–184
Nur U (1990) Heterochromatinization and euchromatinization of whole genomes in scale insects (Coccoidea: Homoptera). Development 1990 [Suppl]: 29–34
Ohno S, Trujillo JM, Kaplan WD, Kinosita R (1961) Nucleolus-organisers in the causation of chromosomal anomalies in man. Lancet II: 123–126
Oksala T, Therman E (1974) Mitotic abnormalities and cancer. In: German J (ed) Chromosomes and cancer. Wiley, New York London Sydney
Rodman TC, Flehinger BJ, Rohlf FJ (1980) Metaphase chromosome association: colcemid distorts the pattern. Cytogenet Cell Genet 27:98–100
Rohlf FJ, Rodman TC, Flehinger BJ (1980) The use of nonmetric multidimensional scaling for the analysis of chromosomal association. Comp Biomed Res 13:19–35
Schardin M, Cremer T, Hager HD, Lang M (1985) Specific staining of human chromosomes in Chinese hamster x man hybrid cell lines demonstrates interphase chromosome territories. Hum Genet 71:281–287
Schmid M, Vogel W, Krone W (1975) Attraction between centric heterochromatin of human chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 15:66–80
Sele B, Jalbert P, Cutsem B van, Lucas M, Mouriquand C, Bouchez R (1977) Distribution of human chromosomes on the metaphase plate using banding techniques. Hum Genet 39:39–61
Strasburger E (1880) Zellbildung und Zellteilung, 3rd edn. Fischer, Jena
Vogel F, Krüger J (1983) Is there a general relationship between estimated chromosome distances in interphase and location of genes with related functions? Hum Genet 63:362–368
Wachtler F, Roubicek C, Schedle A, Mosgöller W, Bretis G, Schwarzacher HG (1990) Nucleolus organizer regions in human lymphocytes as studied with premature chromosome condensation. Hum Genet 84:244–248
Wettstein D von, Rasmussen SW, Holm PB (1984) The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation. Annu Rev Genet 18: 331–413
Wollenberg C, Kiefaber MP, Zang KD (1982) Quantitative studies on the arrangement of human metaphase chromosomes. IX. Arrangement of chromosomes with and without spindle apparatus. Hum Genet 62:310–315
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mosgöller, W., Leitch, A.R., Brown, J.K.M. et al. Chromosome arrangements in human fibroblasts at mitosis. Hum Genet 88, 27–33 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204924
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204924