Skip to main content
Log in

Mosaicism in 45,X Turner syndrome: does survival in early pregnancy depend on the presence of two sex chromosomes?

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Cytogenetic and molecular genetic findings in 91 patients with Turner syndrome are reported. In 87 patients, chromosome studies were carried out both in lymphocyte and fibroblast cultures. Mosaicism was demonstrated in 58 of these patients (66.7%), whereas only 18 (20.7%) were apparent non-mosaic 45,X, and 11 patients (12.6%) showed non-mosaic structural aberrations of the X chromosome. Among the mosaic cases 16 (18.4% of all patients) displayed a second cell line containing small marker chromosomes. The association of Y-specific chromosomal material with the presence of marker chromosomes was demonstrated in 6 out of 7 mixoploid fibroblast cell lines by polymerase chain reaction amplification and by Southern-blot analysis. The observation of ring formation and morphological variability in vivo and in vitro, and the continous reduction in the percentage of cells containing marker chromosomes in longterm cultivation experiments indicated an increased instability of marker chromosomes. The findings suggest that in vivo selection of structurally altered sex chromosomes exists. Thus, the observation of apparent non-mosaic 45,X chromosomal complements in liveborn individuals with Turner syndrome does not contradict the hypothesis that some degree of mosaicism is necessary for survival in early pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnemann J, Epplen JT, Cooke HJ, Sauermann U, Engel W, Schmidtke J (1987) A human Y-chromosome DNA sequence expressed in testicular tissue. Nucleic Acids Res 15:8713–8724

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth A, Rastan S, Lovell-Badge R, Kay G (1991) X-chromosome inactivation may explain the difference in viability of XO humans and mice. Nature 351:406–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow PW (1972) Differential cell division in human X chromosome mosaics. Hum Genet 14:122–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspersson T, Zech L, Johansson C (1970) Analysis of human metaphase chromosome set by aid of DNA-binding fluorescent agents. Exp Cell Res 62:490–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapelle A de la (1983) Sex chromosome abnormalities. In: Emery AEH, Rimoin DL (eds) Principles and practice of medical genetics. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 193–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor JM, Loughlin SAR (1989) Molecular genetics of Turner's syndrome. Acta Paediatr Scand 356:77–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke HJ, Schmidtke J, Gosden JR (1982) Characterisation of a human Y chromosome repeated sequence and related sequences in higher primates. Chromosoma 87:491–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher EMC, Beer-Romero P, Brown LG, Ridley A, McNeil JA, Lawrence JB, Willard HF, Bieber FR, Page DC (1990) Homologous ribosomal protein genes on the human X and Y chromosome: escape from X inactivation and possible implications for Turner syndrome. Cell 63:1205–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemmill RM, Pearce-Birge L, Bixenman H, Hecht BK, Allanson JE (1987) Y chromosome-specific DNA sequences in Turner syndrome mosaicism. Am J Hum Genet 41:157–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall JG, Sybert VP, Williamson RA, Fisher NL, Reed SD (1982) Turner's Syndrome. West J Med 137:32–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassold T, Kumlin E, Takaesu N, Leppert M (1985) Determination of the parental origin of sex-chromosome monosomy using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 37:965–972

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassold T, Benham F, Leppert M (1988) Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of sex-chromosome monsomy. Am J Hum Genet 42:534–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Held KR, Sönnichsen S (1984) The effect of oxygen tension on colony formation and cell proliferation of amniotic fluid cells in vitro. Prenat Diagn 4:171–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn H, Simpson M, Bryant EM, Rabinovitch PS, Salk D, Martin GM (1980) Effects of chromosome constitution on growth and longevity of human skin fibroblast cultures. Am J Med Genet 7:141–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook EB (1977) Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95%, and 99% confidence limits and comments on use. Am J Hum Genet 29:94–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook EB, Warburton D (1983) The distribution of chromosomal genotypes associated with Turner's syndrome: livebirth prevalence and evidence for diminished fetal mortality and severtiy in genotypes associated with structural X abnormalities or mosaicism. Hum Genet 64:24–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs PA, Betts PR, Cockwell AE, Crolla JA, Mackenzie MJ, Robinson DO, Youings SA (1990) A cytogenetic and molecular reappraisal of a series of patients with Turner's syndrome. Ann Hum Genet 54:209–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakubiczka S, Arnemann J, Kahler S, Thüring S, Schmidtke J (1990) A rapid protocol for the characterization of Yp aberration. 2. Tagung der Gesellschaft für Humangenetik, Bonn, March 1990

  • Johnson VP, McDonough PG, Cheung SW, Sun L (1991) Sex chromosome marker: clinical significance and DNA characterization. Am J Med Genet 39:97–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalousek DK, Dill FJ, Pantzar T, McGillivray BC (1987) Confined chromosomal mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis. Hum Genet 77:163–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky E, Singh S, Held KR, Kerber S, Seemanova E, Goedde HW (1991) Risk assessment for gonadal tumours in patients with Turner syndrome and its mosaics by identification of Y chromosome-specific sequences. In: Issinger OG (ed) Advances in molecular genetics 3. Hüthig, Heidelberg, pp 193–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukharenko VI, Grinberg KN, Kuliev AM (1978) Mitotic cycles in human cell strains with sex chromosomes aneuploidy. Hum Genet 42:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CC, Meyne J, Sasi R, Bowen P, Unger T, Tainaka T, Hadro TA, Hoo JJ (1990) Determining the origins and the structural aberrations of small marker chromosomes in two cases of 45,X/46,X,+mar by use of chromosome-specific DNA probes. Am J Med Genet 37:71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Magenis E, Donlon T (1982) Nonfluorescent Y chromosomes. Cytologic evidence of origin. Hum Genet 60:133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T, Camargo M, Tagatz G, Okagaki T, Cervenka J, Cahill L, Wachtel S, King R, Twiggs LB (1984) Gonadal tumors in patients with gonadal dysgenesis and sex chromosomal rings and fragments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 150:76–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Page DC, Mosher R, Simpson EM, Fisher E, Mardon G, Pollack J, McGillivray B, Chapelle A de la, Brown LG (1987) The sex-determining region of the human Y chromosome encodes a finger protein. Cell 51:1091–1104

    Google Scholar 

  • Pai GS, Thomas GH (1980) A new R-banding technique in clinical cytogenetics. Hum Genet 54:41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer CG, Reichmann A (1976) Chromosomal and clinical findings in 110 females with Turner syndrome. Hum Genet 35:35–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Park E, Bailey JD, Cowell CA (1983) Growth and maturation of patients with Turner's syndrome. Pediatr Res 17:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Polani PE (1970) Growing points in cell pathology. Proc R Soc Med 63:955–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Procter SE, Watt JL, Lloyd DJ, Duffty P (1984) Problems of deecting mosaicism in skin. A case of trisomy 8 mosaicism illustrating the advantages of in situ tissue culture. Clin Genet 25:273–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranke MB, Pflüger H, Rosendahl W, Stubbe P, Enders H, Bierich JR, Majewski F (1983) Turner syndrome: spontaneous growth in 150 cases and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr 141:81–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiki RK, Scharf F, Faloona S, Mullis K, Horn G, Erlich H, Arnheim N (1985) Enzymatic amplification of β-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle-cell anemia. Science 230:1350–1354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer G, Schempp W, Baccichetti C, Lenzini E, Dagna Bricarelli F, Carbone LD, Wolf U (1989) Duplication of an Xp segment that includes the ZFX locus causes sex inversion in man. Hum Genet 81:291–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabright M (1971) A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet II:971–972

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75:304–306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verp MS, Rosinsky B, LeBeau MM, Martin AO, Kaplan R, Wallemark CB, Otano L, Simpson JL (1988) Growth disadvantage of 45,X and 46,X,del(X)(p11) fibroblasts. Clin Genet 33:277–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Waye JS, Willard HF (1988) Chromosome-specific α satellite DNA: nucleotide sequences of the 2. 0kb repeat from the human X chromosome. Nucleic Acids Res 13:2731–2743

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt M, Erickson RP (1989) A rapid method for detection of Y chromosomal DNA from dried blood specimens by the polymerase chain reaction. Hum Genet 82:271–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt M, Erickson RP (1991) A rapid method for detection of Y-chromosomal DNA from dried blood specimens by the polymerase chain reaction (Erratum). Hum Genet 86:540

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe J, Darling SM, Erickson RP, Craig IW, Buckle VJ, Rigby P, Willard HF, Goodfellow PN (1985) Isolation and characterization of an alphoid centromeric repeat family from human Y chromosome. Mol Biol 182:477–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong C, Kazazian HH Jr, Stellen G, Earnshaw WC, VanKeuren ML, Antonarakis SE (1989) Molecular mechanism in the formation of a human ring chromosome 21. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:1914–1918

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Held, K.R., Kerber, S., Kaminsky, E. et al. Mosaicism in 45,X Turner syndrome: does survival in early pregnancy depend on the presence of two sex chromosomes?. Hum Genet 88, 288–294 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00197261

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00197261

Keywords

Navigation