Skip to main content
Log in

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of buffered sublingual captopril in patients with congestive heart failure

  • Pharmacokinetics And Disposition
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of buffered sublingual captopril were assessed in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF).

Methods: The study was carried out in a randomised single-blind cross-over fashion (n=6, 4 males and 2 females) and involved two study days, at least 7 days apart. Baseline measurements were carried out for plasma renin activity (PRA), blood pressure (B.P.) and heart rate (H.R.). Captopril (12.5 mg) was administered sublingually with dibasic potassium phosphate which maintained salivary pH at 7, or perorally with 100 ml of water. Further B.P., H.R. measurements and venous blood samples were taken over a 3 hour period post-drug administration. Blood samples were analysed for captopril and PRA levels.

Results: tmax after buffered sublingual administration of captopril, which ranged from 40–60 min (median=40 min), was significantly shorter than after peroral administration (range 60–120 min, median=90 min). Cmax was slightly greater after buffered sublingual than after peroral administration with mean values of 108.2 vs. 94.0 ng·ml−1. AUC values were similar after both routes of administration. Systolic and diastolic B.P. vs. time profiles for each administration method were significantly different i.e. sublingual administration produced an earlier reduction in B.P., however, HR did not differ significantly between the two routes.

Conclusion: The data indicate that this novel administration method of captopril leads to an increased rate, but an unchanged extent of captopril absorption, suggesting a modest therapeutic advantage with the use of buffered sublingual captopril if a rapid reduction in blood pressure is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crozier I, Ikram H (1992) Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors versus digoxin for the treatment of congestive heart failure. Drugs 43:637–650

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chow M (1993) Assessing the treatment of congestive heart failure: diuretics, vasodilators, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Pharmacotherapy 13:82S-87S

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cody RJ, Schaer GL and Covit AB, Pondolfno K, Williams G (1992) Captopril kinetics in chronic congestive heart failure. Clin Pharmacol Ther 32:721–726

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duchin KL, McKinstry DN, Cohen AI, Migdalof BH (1988) Pharmacokinetics of captopril in healthy subjects and in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Clin Pharmacokinet 14:241–259

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brogden RN, Todd PA, Sorkin EM (1988) Captopril: An update of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and congestive heart failure. Drugs 36:540–600

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ceyhan B, Karaaslan Y, Caymaz O, Oto A, Oram E, Oram A, Ugurlu S (1990) Comparison of sublingual captopril and sublingual nifedipine in hypertensive emergencies. Jap J Pharmacol 52:189–193

    Google Scholar 

  7. Longhini C, Ansani L, Musacci G, Mele D, Vaccari M, Baracca E, Sgobino P (1990) The effect of captopril on peripheral haemodynamics in patients with essential hypertension: comparison between oral and sublingual administration. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 4:751–754

    Google Scholar 

  8. Angeli P, Chiesa M, Caregaro L, Merkel C, Sacerdoti D, Rondana M, Gatta A (1991) Comparison of sublingual captopril and nifedipine in immediate treatment of hypertensive emergencies. Arch Intern Med 151:678–682

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wu SG, Lin SL, Shiao WY, Huang HW, Lin CF, Yang YH (1993) Comparison of sublingual captopril, nifedipine and prazosin in hypertensive emergencies during hemodialysis. Nephron 65:284–287

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haude M, Steffen W, Erbel R, Meyer J (1990) Sublingual administration of captopril versus nitroglycerin in patients with severe congestive heart failure. Int J Cardiol 27:351–359

    Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Furaih TA, McElnay JC, Elborn JS, Rusk R, Scott MG, McMahon J, Nicholls DP (1991) Sublingual captopril-a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 40:393–398

    Google Scholar 

  12. McElnay JC, Al-Furaih TA, Hughes CM, Elborn JS (1995) The effect of pH on the buccal and sublingual absorption of captopril. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 48:373–379

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pereira CM, Tam YK (1988) Simplified determination of captopril in plasma by high performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 425:208–213

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harris D, Robinson JR (1992) Drug delivery via the mucous membranes of the oral cavity. J Pharm Sci 81:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  15. Creasy WA, Funke PT, McKinstry DN, Sugerman AA (1986) Pharmacokinetics of captopril in elderly healthy male volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 26:264–268

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martinez Amenos A, Carratala J, Pinto X, Santalo M, Tamayo C, Pujol M (1987) Hypertensive crisis: a comparative study of oral captopril, sublingual captopril and sublingual nifedipine. Med Clin 89:59–61

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dessi-Fulgheri P, Bandiera F, Rubattu S, Cocco F, Madeddu P, Oppes M, Tonol GC, Glorioso N, Rappeli A (1987) Comparison of sublingual and oral captopril in hypertension. Clin Expt Theory Prac 9:593–597

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McElnay, J.C., Al-Furaih, T.A., Hughes, C.M. et al. A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of buffered sublingual captopril in patients with congestive heart failure. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 49, 471–476 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00195933

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00195933

Key words

Navigation