Skip to main content
Log in

Equity and efficiency in non-convex economies

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to consider the following question. Does the presence of increasing returns introduce a fundamental trade-off between equity and efficiency objectives? We show that if the no-envy notion of Foley (1967) is taken as the equity criterion and Pareto optimality as the efficiency criterion, then the answer is yes; there exist economies with increasing returns and well-behaved preferences (and no agent-specific inputs) in which there do not exist any envy-free and Pareto optimal allocations. We also propose a weakening of the no-envy criterion and prove that this weaker equity notion is compatible with Pareto optimality in general non-convex economies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beato P, Mas-Colell A (1985) On marginal cost pricing with given tax-subsidy rules. J Econ Theory 37: 356–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown D.J, Heal GM (1979) Equity efficiency and increasing returns. Rev Econ Stud 46: 471–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown DJ, Heal GM (1985) The optimality of regulated pricing: a general equilibrium analysis. In: Aliprantis CD, Burkinshaw O, Rothman NJ (eds) Adv Equilibrium Theory. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornet B (1988) General equilibrium theory and increasing returns (special issue) J Math Econ 17

  • Daniel T (1978) Pitfalls in the theory of fairness-comment. J Econ Theory 19: 561–564

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantaras D (1989) On equity with public goods (mimeo, Temple University)

  • Feldman A, Kirman A (1974) Fairness and envy. Amer Econ Rev 64: 995–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley D (1967) Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Econ Essays 7: 45–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Guesnerie R (1975) Pareto optimality in non-convex economies. Econometrica 43: 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz L, Reiter S (1973) On the boundedness of the feasibility set without convexity assumptions. Int Econ Rev 14: 580–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H, Thomson W (1988) Can everyone benefit from growth? Two difficulties. J Math Econ 17: 339–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazner E, Schmeidler D (1974) A difficulty in the concept of fairness. Rev Econ Stud 41: 441–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazner E, Schmeidler, D, (1978) Egalitarian equivalent allocations: a new concept of economic equity. Quart J Econ 92: 671–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarf HE (with the collaboration of Hansen T) (1973) Computat Econ Equilibria, Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson LG (1983) On the existence of fair allocations. Zeitschr Nationalokon 43: 301–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson W (1989) Equity concepts in economics (mimeo, University of Rochester)

  • Varian H (1974) Equity, envy and efficiency. J Econ Theory 9: 63–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Vohra R (1988) Optimal regulation under fixed rules for income distribution. J Econ Theory 45: 65–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Vohra R (1990) On the inefficiency of two-part tariffs. Rev Econ Stud 57: 415–438

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am indebted to W. Thomson for many helpful discussions. Thanks are also due to D. Diamantaras and B. Dutta and to participants of seminars at Columbia University, University of Bielefeld, University of Alicante and Cornell University for comments on an earlier draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vohra, R. Equity and efficiency in non-convex economies. Soc Choice Welfare 9, 185–202 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192877

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192877

Keywords

Navigation