Skip to main content
Log in

Response of crops to high exchangeable sodium percentage

  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Tolerance of crops to soil sodicity as represented by high exchangeable sodium has been examined utilizing data from field and greenhouse studies. A piecewise linear model has been utilized for describing the crop response curves. Salt tolerance indices including the threshold ESP, slope which represents yield decline per unit increase in ESP and the value of ESP at which yield is reduced by 50% are reported for 20 crops. In respect to threshold ESP, Sesbania is the most tolerant of the crops tested followed by rice (transplanted) and wheat. These are the only three crops in which threshold ESP exceeds 15. Genotypic differences for sodicity tolerance have been examined for rice and wheat, with CSR 3 — a natural selection among the rice genotypes — and Kharchia 65 among the wheat genotypes appear to be the most tolerant. The cumulative effect of ionic imbalance and water uptake are found to be the factors governing tolerance differences. The sodicity tolerance indices reported herein represent the relative sodicity tolerance of crops to high exchangeable sodium and could be used in management and crop planning in amended sodic soils and/or management of sodic waters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrol IP, Bhumbla DR (1979) Crop response to differential gypsum application in a highly sodic soil and the tolerance of several crops to exchangeable sodium under field conditions. Soil Sci 127:79

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein L (1974) Crop growth and salinity. In: van Schilfgaarde J (ed) Drainage for agriculture. 17:39

  • Bernstein L, Pearson GA (1956) Influence of exchangeable sodium on the yield of plants. I. Green beans, garden beets, clover and alfalfa. Soil Sci 82:247

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava GP, Singhla SK, Abrol IP (1972) Characteristics of some typical saline-sodic soils of Karnal district (Haryana). CSSRI Report 2:37

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein L (1975) Effect of salinity and sodicity on plant growth. Ann Rev Phytopathol 73:295

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya RK (1976) Promising rice selections suited to coastal saline soils. J Soc Exp Agric 1:21

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey DR (1960) Salt tolerance of twenty five strains of Agropyron. Agron J 52:631

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois LE (1982) Effect of excess boron on tomato yield, fruit size and vegetative growth. J Am Soc Hort Sci 109:322

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SK (1986) Agricultural drainage methods for salt affected soils. Sinchan 4:91

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi YC, Qadar A, Rana RS (1979) Differential sodium and potassium cumulation related to sodicity tolerance in wheat. Indian J Plant Physiol 22:226

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas EV (1986) Crop tolerance to saline soil and water. Prospectus for Biosaline Research. Proc US-Pak Biosaline Res Workshop, Karachi, Pakistan: 205

  • Maas EV, Hoffman GJ (1977) Crop salt tolerance: Current assessment. J Irrig Drainage Div 103 (IR2):115

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson GA (1960) Tolerance of crops to exchangeable sodium. U.S. Dept Agric Infor Bull 216

  • Pearson GA, Bernstein L (1958) Influence of exchangeable sodium on yield and chemical composition of plants (2) wheat, barley, oats, rice, tall fescue and tall wheat grass. Soil Sci 86:254

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades JD (1982) Reclamation and management of salt affected soils after drainage. In: Rationalization of water and soil research and management. Proc of the Ist annual water provincial conference, Lethbridge; Canada: 123

  • Rush DW, Epstein E (1976) Genotypic differences between salt sensitive and salt tolerant genotypes of tomato. Plant Physiol 57:162

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon MC, Qualset CO (1984) Benefits and limitations in breeding salt-tolerant crops. Calif Agric 38:33

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SK (1986) Mechanism of tolerance in rice varieties differing in sodicity tolerance. Plant Soil 93:141

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SK (1987) Effect of exchangeable sodium on growth, yield and ionic relations in sodicity sensitive and resistant genotypes. Plant Physiol Biochem 14:87

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SK, Joshi YC, Bal AR (1984) Osmotic and ionic effects in salt sensitive and resistant wheat varieties. Indian J Plant Physiol 27:153

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SB, Abrol IP (1985) Effect of soil sodicity on the growth, yield and chemical composition of groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea Linn). Plant Soil 84:123

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SB, Chhabra R, Abrol IP (1981) Effect of exchangeable sodium on the yield, chemical composition and oil content of safflower and linseed. Indian J Agric Sci 51:885

    Google Scholar 

  • US Salinity Laboratory Staff (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. US Dep Agric Handbook 60

  • Van Genuchten MTh, Hoffman GJ (1984) Analysis of crop salt tolerance data. In: Shainberg I, Shalhevet J (eds) Soil salinity under irrigation. Springer, Berlin, p 258

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav JSP, Gupta IC (1984) Usar Bhumi Ka Sudhar (In Hindi). Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Principal Scientist (Soil and Water Conservation Engg.) and Senior Scientist (Plant Physiology) respectively

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, S.K., Sharma, S.K. Response of crops to high exchangeable sodium percentage. Irrig Sci 11, 173–179 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00189455

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00189455

Keywords

Navigation