Abstract
The purpose of the study is to present our experience and compare the results of the three types of ports used as a central venous access and performed in the radiology suite. Between March 1989 and November 1993 we performed 288 implantations (100 Implantofix Seldinger, 100 plastic Hickman port, and 88 stainless steel Port-a-cath) for chemotherapeutic treatment on the same number of patients diagnosed as having cancer. In all cases access was obtained via a subclavian vein (the left one in 185 cases and the right one in 103). All the system ports were implanted in the radiology suite. In all cases the procedure was successfully performed. Complications occurred in 26.3% of cases, most notably thrombosis in 13 cases (4.5%) and infection in 12 cases (4.1%). Duration of the port systems placement varied between 17 and 1467 days (a mean of 315 days). A total of 133 systems have been removed to date, 80 (60.%) due to termination of chemotherapy, and 53(40%) for treatment of complications. Significant differences (complications and port duration time) were not observed between the three types of reservoir used. Subcutaneous ports are safe, comfortable, and effective devices for central venous access.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hovsepian DM, Bonn J, Eschelman DJ (1993) Techniques for peripheral insertion of central venous catheters. JVIR 4: 795–803
Taus LF, Deustsch LS, Miller DP, McKenzie RA, Brandon JC (1992) Venous access radiology versus surgery.1992 SCIVIR Meeting abstracts. JVIR 3: 33
Davis S, Thompson JS, Edney JM (1984) Insertion of Hickman catheters. A comparison of cutdown and percutaneous techniques. Am Surg 50: 673–676
Robertson LJ, Mauro MA, Jacques PF (1989) Radiology placement of Hickman catheters. Radiology 170: 1007–1009
Morris SL, Jacques PF, Mauro MA (1992) Radiology assisted placement of implantable subcutaneous infusion ports for long-term venous access. Radiology 184: 149–151
Bothe A, Piccione W, Ambrosino JJ, Benotti PN, Lokich JJ (1984) Implantable central venous access system. Am J Surg 147: 565–569
Gyves J, Ensminger W, Niederhuber J, et al. (1982) Totally implanted system for intravenous chemoterapy in patients with cancer. Am J Med 73: 841–845
Wright KC, Swarc IA, Collins RD, Gianturco C (1983) A new subcutaneous vascular access device: an experimental evaluation. Radiology 146: 222–223
Kusminsky RE, Boland JP (1979) Vascular access for chemotherapy: General methodology and experience with a new reservoir. W Va Med J 75: 209–212
Denny DF (1993) Placement and management of long-term central venous access catheters and ports. AJR 161: 385–393
Pulido-Duque JM, Fernando CC, Reyes R, Ojeda E, Casal M, Gorriz E, Maynar M, Castañeda-Zuñiga W (1992) Percutaneous Hickman catheter placement in the radiology suite. Intervent Radiol 2: 1385–1386
Kahn ML (1994) Percutaneous placement of long-term venous access devices. In: Cope C (ed) Current techniques in interventional radiology: current medicine. Philadelphia, pp 9.1–9.10
Mauro MA, Jacques PF, Stubbebine N (1992) Impact of radiological central venous catheter placement service. 1992 SCI-VIR Meeting abstracts JVIR 3: 33
Niederhuber JH, Ensminger W, Gyves JW, Liepman M, Doan K, Cozzi E (1982) Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. Surgery 92: 706–711
Corona ML, Peters SG, Narr BJ, Thompson RL (1990) Subspeciality clinics: critical-care medicine. Mayo Clin Proc 65: 979–986
Reed WP, Newman KA, Jongh de, Wade JC, Schimpll SC, Wiernik PH, Mc Langhin JS (1983) Prolonged venous access for chemotherapy by means of the Hickman catheter. Cancer 52: 185–192
Haire WD, Lieberman RP, Edney J, Voughan WP, Kissinger A, Armitage JO, Goldsmith JC (1990) Hickman catheter-induced thoracic vein thrombosis. Frequency and long-term sequelae in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and marrow transplantation. Cancer 66: 900–908
Haire WD, Lieberman RP, Gunnar BL, Edney J, Bridget M, Wieczorek M (1990) Obstructed central venous catheters. Cancer 66: 2279–2285
Lockich JL, Becker B (1983) Subclavian vein thrombosis in patients with infusion chemotherapy for advanced malignancy Cancer 52: 1586–1589
Rubenstein M, Creger RP (1990) Successful streptokinase therapy for catheter-induced subclavian vein thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 140: 1370–1371
Fraschini G, Jadeja J, Lawson M, Holmes FA, Carrasco HC, Wallace S (1987) Local infusion of urokinase for the lysis of thrombus associated with permanent central venous catheters in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 5: 672–678
Bern MM, Lokich JJ, Wallace SR, Bothe A, Benotti PN, Arkin CF, Greco FA, Huberman H, Moore C (1991) Very low doses of warfarin can prevent thrombosis in central venous catheters. A randomized prospective trial. Am Intern Med 112: 423–428
Hickman RO, Buckner CD, Clift RA, Sanders J, Stewart P, Thomas D (1979) A modified right atrial catheter for access to the venous system in marrow transplant recipients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 148: 871–875
Broviac JW, Cole JJ, Scrbner BH (1973) A silicone rubber atrial catheter for prolonged parenteral alimentation (1973) Surg Gynecol Obstet 136: 602–606
Larson EB, Margaret W, Hickman RO (1981) Infectious complications of right atrial catheters used for venous access in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 153: 369–373
Brothers TE, Moll KK von, Nizderhuber JE (1988) Experience with subcutaneous infusion ports in three hundred patients Surg Gynecol Obstet 166: 295–301
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Correspondence to: M. A. de Gregorio
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Gregorio, M.A., Miguelena, J.M., Fernández, J.A. et al. Subcutaneous ports in the radiology suite: an effective and safe procedure for care in cancer patients. Eur. Radiol. 6, 748–752 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187683
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187683