Skip to main content
Log in

MRI in acute phase of whiplash injury

  • Original Articles
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective MRI study of 39 whiplash patients was performed and results were compared with the clinical findings. The inclusion criteria were: (1) automobile accident, (2) noncontact cervical spine trauma, (3) no skull injury, (4) conscious patient, (5) no previously known cervical pain before the accident, (6) plain X-ray of the cervical spine without fracture and (7) MRI within 15 days after trauma. All MR images were obtained blinded with no previous knowledge of the patient's symptoms or findings. The MRI parameters included disc bulging either with impingment on the anterior epidural space or with medullary compression, foraminal stenosis, dorsal ligament thickening, osteophyte extension and intramedullary or paravertebral soft tissue injury. All changes were graded visually on a four-point scale (no, some, moderate or extensive changes). After the MRI evaluation was made the clinical findings were analysed by two orthopaedic surgeons using a specially designed protocol. With MRI 29 patients (74%) showed no or only slight changes, and were thus regarded as normal variations. Of these, 10 of 29 patients (34%) had as the only symptom pain in the head or in the neck, 19 of 29 patients (66%) showed neurological changes, either paresthesias, sensory deficits or weakness of upper extremities. In 10 (26%) patients with moderate or extensive MRI changes, 3 of 10 (33%) had only head or neck pain, or both, and 7 of 10 (66%) had neurological changes. Use of MRI in whiplash injury is helpful, but it is not the first-choice radiological examination method. Despite neurological changes, the frequency of true traumatic lesions is low. There is no clear correlation between the patient's subjective symptoms or clinical signs and the findings with MRI. However, MRI can be used to find patients with disk herniation that can be treated surgically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Macnab I (1971) The “whiplash syndrome”. Orthop Clin North Am 2: 389

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kulkarni MV, McArdle CB, Kopanicky D, Miner M, Cotler HB, Lee KF, Harris JH (1987) Acute spinal cord injury: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 164: 837

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mirvis SE, Geisler FH, Jelinek JJ, Joslyn JN, Gellad F (1988) Acute cervical spine trauma: evaluation with 1.5-T MR imaging. Radiology 166: 807

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beers GJ, Raque GH, Wagner GG, Shields CB, Nichols GR, Johnson JR, Meyer JE (1988) MR imaging in acute cervical spine trauma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12: 755

    Google Scholar 

  5. Flanders AE, Schaefer DM, Doan HT, Mishkin MM, Gonzalez CF, Northrup BE (1990) Acute cervical spine trauma: correlation of MR imaging findings with degree of neurologic deficit. Radiology 177: 25

    Google Scholar 

  6. Silberstein M, Tress BM, Hennessy O (1992) Delayed neurologic deterioration in the patient with spinal trauma: role of MR imaging. AJNR 13: 1373

    Google Scholar 

  7. Silberstein M, Tress BM, Hennessy O (1992) Prediction of neurologic outcome in acute spinal cord injury: the role of CT and MR. AJNR 13: 1597

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis SJ, Teresi LM, Bradley WG, Ziemba MA, Bloze AE (1991) Cervical spine hyperextension injuries: MR findings. Radiology 180: 245

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baker LL, Goodman SB, Perkash I, Lane B, Enzman DR (1990) Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical shift, and STIR MR imaging. Radiology 174: 495

    Google Scholar 

  10. Penning L (1980) Prevertebral hematoma in cervical spine injury: incidence and etiologic significance. AJNR 1: 557

    Google Scholar 

  11. Edeiken-Monroe B, Wagner LK, Harris JH Jr (1986) Hyperextension dislocation of the cervical spine. AJNR 7: 135

    Google Scholar 

  12. Regenbogen VS, Rogers LF, Atlas SW, Kim KS (1986) Cervical spinal cord injuries in patients with cervical spondylosis. AJR 146: 277

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rowed DW, Tator CH (1982) Cervical spondylosis in acute cervical cord injuries. In: Tator CH (ed) Early management of acute spinal cord injury. Raven Press, New York, p 335

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hackney DB (1990) Denominators of spinal cord injury. Radiology 177: 18

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boden SD, McCovin PR, Davis DO, Dina TS, Mark AS, Wiesel S (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg 72 A: 1178

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bring G, Westman G (1991) Chronic posttraumatic syndrome after whiplash injury. Scand J Prim Health Care 9: 135

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: M. Fagerlund

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fagerlund, M., Björnebrink, J., Pettersson, K. et al. MRI in acute phase of whiplash injury. Eur. Radiol. 5, 297–301 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00185315

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00185315

Key words

Navigation