Skip to main content
Log in

A simplified technique for ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

From October 1988 to December 1993, 148 kidney transplants were carried out at our institution. An extravesical ureteral reimplantation technique resulting in a submucosal tunnel in the bladder wall was performed on 101 of the patients. For this technique, two small incisions are made at the outer part of the bladder wall until the mucosa is seen. then a submucosal tunnel is dissected between them and the graft's ureter is introduced and advanced in it (Alférez-Barry). Afterward the bladder mucosa is opened at the distal incision and the ureter is introduced into the bladder and fixed by a single direct anchorage stich (Taguchi). The minimal patients' follow-up is 18 months. Complications deriving from ureter reimplantation with this technique were present in 12.8% of the patients and included 4 cases of stenosis (3.9%), 4 cases of urinary fistula (3.9%), and 5 cases of hematuria (4.9%). We conclude that submucosal tunnelled ureteroneocystostomy with direct anchorage is a technique that simplifies kidney transplant surgery with good results. Ureteral direct anchorage can be used in any kind of ureteral anastomosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alférez Villalobos C (1970) Técnicas del transplante de riñón. Acta Asoc Esp Urol 2:271–275

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barry JM (1983) Unstented extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in kidney transplantation. J Urol 129:918–919

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cos LR, Light JA, Stutzman RE (1985) External ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation. Urology 26:362–366

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dodson AI (1946) Some improvements in the technique of ureterocystostomy. J Urol 55:225–237

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donohue JP, Hostetter M, Glover J, Madura J (1975) Ureteroneocystostomy versus ureteropyelostomy: a comparison in the same renal allograft series. J Urol 114:202–203

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hefty TR (1985) Experience with parallel incision extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in kidney transplantation. J Urol 134:455–456

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kashi SH, Lodge JPA, Giles GR, Irving HC (1992) Ureteric complications of renal transplantation. Br J Urol 70:139–143

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lefebvre YJ, Squifflet JP, Kartherhauser AH, Khoury G, Pirson Y, Van Cangh PJ, Alexandre GPJ (1986) La reimplantation urétero-vesicale par voie antérieure extravesicale. Acta Ural Belg 54:152–159

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lucas BA, McRoberts JW, Curtis JJ, Luke RG (1979) Controversy in renal transplantation: antireflux versus non antireflux ureteroneocystostomy. J Urol 121:156–158

    Google Scholar 

  10. MacKinnon KJ, Oliver JA, Morehouse DD, Taguchi Y (1968) Cadaver renal transplantation: emphasis on urological aspects. J Urol 99:486–490

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martin DC, Mims MM, Kauffman JK, Goodwin WE (1969) The ureter in renal transplantation. J Urol 101:680–687

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mathew TH, Kincaid-Smith P, Vikraman P (1977) Risks of vesicoureteric reflux in the transplanted kidney. N Engl J Med 297:414–418

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mesrobian HGJ, Miller CG, Hatchett RL, Azizkhan RG, Lacey SR (1992) Modified extravesical ureteral reimplantation in pediatric renal transplantation: 5 years of experience. J Urol 147:1340–1342

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ohl DA, Konnak JW, Campbell DA, Dafoe DC, Merion RM, Turcotte JG (1988) Extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation. J Urol 139:499–502

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sagalowski AI, Ransler CW, Peters PC, Dickermann RM, Gailiunas P, Helderman JH (1983) Urologic complications in 505 renal transplants with early catheter removal. J Urol 129:929–932

    Google Scholar 

  16. Salvatierra O Jr, Olcott C IV, Amend WJ Jr, Cochrum KC, Feduska NJ (1977) Urological complications of renal transplantation can be preserved or controlled. J Urol 117:421–424

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sumrani NB, Lipkowitz GS, Hong JH, Hanson P, Butt KMH (1989) Complications of “one stitch” extravesical ureteric implantation in renal transplants in the cyclosporine and precyclosporine eras. Transplant Proc 21:1957–1959

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thraser JB, Temple DR, Spees EK (1990) Extravesical versus Leadbetter-Politano ureteroneocystostomy: a comparison of urological complications in 320 renal transplants. J Urol 144:1105–1109

    Google Scholar 

  19. Villavicencio H, Errando C, Huguet J, Regalado R, Chéchile G (1994) Ileal neobladder with Studer's technique. J Urol 151:A503

  20. Wasnick RJ, Butt KM, Laungani G, Shirani K, Hong JH, Adamsons RJ, Waterhouse K (1981) Evaluation of anterior extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in kidney transplantation. J Urol 126:306–307

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caparrós, J., Regalado, R.I., Sánchez-Martín, F. et al. A simplified technique for ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation. World J Urol 14, 236–238 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182073

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182073

Keywords

Navigation