Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of haloperidol on amphetamine-and methylphenidate-induced conditioned place preferences and locomotor activity

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Place preferences induced by the indirect dopamine (DA) receptor agonists amphetamine (AMP) and methylphenidate (MPD) were investigated using an unbiased compartment procedure. In this procedure, prior to drug conditioning, rats did not exhibit preferences for either of the two compartments in a shuttle box. Both stimulants produced place preferences. Repeated testing of the MPD conditioned animals revealed an extinction-like decrease in preferences, suggesting that place preferences produced by MPD result from conditioning of MPD's reinforcing properties to environmental cues. During conditioning, the DA receptor antagonist haloperidol was administered prior to drug (S+) treatments, or prior to both drug and vehicle (S−) treatments. Haloperidol pretreatment blocked place preferences induced by AMP but not by MPD. In contrast, haloperidol blocked locomotor activity stimulated by either AMP or MPD. These results suggest that the reinforcing properties of MPD and AMP may be mediated by different mechanisms, while the locomotor stimulant effects of the two drugs have common neural substrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beninger RJ, Hahn BL (1983) Pimozide blocks establishment but not expression of amphetamine-produced environment-specific conditioning. Science 220:1304–1306

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozarth MA, Wise RA (1981) Heroin reward is dependent on a dopaminergic substrate. Life Sci 29:1881–1886

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Scala G, Martin-Iverson MT, Phillips AG, Fibiger HC (1985) The effects of progabide (SL 76002) on locomotor activity and conditioned place preference induced by d-amphetamine. Eur J Pharmacol 107:271–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz RJ, Gormezano G (1979) A rapid and inexpensive technique for assessing the reinforcing effects of opiate drugs. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11:231–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Iverson MT, Ortmann F, Fibiger HC (1985) Place preference conditioning with methylphenidate and nomifensine. Brain Res 332:59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Iverson MT, Radke JM, Vincent SR (1986) The effects of cysteamine on dopamine-mediated behaviours: evidence for dopamine-somatostatin interactions in the striatum. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 24:1707–1714

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore KE, Chieuh CC, Zelds G (1977) Release of neurotransmitters in vivo by amphetamine, methylphenidate and cocaine. In: Ellinwood EH Jr., Kilbey MM (eds) Cocaine and other stimulants: Advances in behavioral biology, vol 21. Plenum Press New York, pp 143–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips AG, LePiane FG (1980) Reinforcing effects of morphine microinjection into the ventral tegmental area. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:965–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips AG, LePiane FG (1982) Reward produced by microinjection of (d-ala), Met-enkephalinamide into the ventral tegmental area. Behav Brain Res 5:225–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz AS, Marchok PL (1974) Depression of morphine-seeking behavior by dopamine inhibition. Nature 248:257–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman JE, Roberts T, Roskam SE, Holman EW (1980) Temporal properties of the rewarding and aversive effects of amphetamine in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 13:597–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore PA (1976) Actions of amfonelic acid and other non-amphetamine stimulants on the dopamine neuron. J Pharm Pharmacol 28:855–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyraki C, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1982a) Cocaine-induced place preference conditioning: lack of effects of neuroleptics and 6-hydroxydopamine lesions. Brain Res 253:195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyraki C, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1982b) Dopaminergic substrates of amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning. Brain Res 253:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyraki C, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1983) Attenuation of heroin reward in rats by disruption of the mesolimbic dopamine system. Psychopharmacology 79:278–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton MJ, Lind MD, Merriman VJ, Bozarth MA, Reid LF (1979) Affective consequences and subsequent effects on morphine administration of d-ala2-methionine enkephaline. Physiol Psychol 7:146–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow NR, Koob GF (1984) Restrained rats learn amphetamine-conditioned locomotion, but not place preference. Psychopharmacology 84:163–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldmeier PC (1982) Effects of antidepressant drugs on dopamine uptake and metabolism. J Pharm Pharmacol 34:391–394

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mithani, S., Martin-Iverson, M.T., Phillips, A.G. et al. The effects of haloperidol on amphetamine-and methylphenidate-induced conditioned place preferences and locomotor activity. Psychopharmacology 90, 247–252 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00181251

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00181251

Key words

Navigation