Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Recent advances in bone densitometry

  • Editorial
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Brown ML, Morin RL, Riggs BL. Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine. Mayo Clin Proc 1988; 63:1075–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kelly TL, Slovik DM, Schoenfeld DA, Neer RM. Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988; 67:839–844.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cullum ID, Ell PJ, Ryder JP. X-ray dual photon absorptiometry: a new method for the measurement of bone density. Br J Radiol 1989; 62:587–592.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sorenson JA, Duke PR, Smith SW. Simulations studies of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Med Phys 1989; 16:75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blake GM, Tong CM, Fogelman I. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer. Br J Radiol 1991 ; 440–446.

  6. Blake GM, McKeeney DB, Chhaya SC, Ryan PJ, Fogelman I. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: the effects of beam hardening on bone density measurements. Med Phys 1992; 19:459–465.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mazess R, Collick B, Trempe J, Barden H, Hanson J. Performance evaluation of a dual-energy X-ray bone densitometer. Calcif Tissue Int 1989; 44:228–232.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buxton FMA, Blake GM, Parker JC, Fogelman I. Spinal bone density measured with a 5 second scan. Br J Radiol 1993; 66:275–277.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Steiger P, van Stetten E, Weiss H, Stein JA. Paired AP and lateral supine dual x-ray absorptiometry of the spine: initial results with a 32 detector system. Osteoporosis Int 1991; 1:190 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pommet R, Chambellan D, Reverchon P, Pare C, Lecluse A, Panissier P. Array multidetector bone densitometer for supine lateral vertebral measurement in lateral projection. Osteoporosis Int 1991; 1:190 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Devogelaer JP, Baudoux C, Nagant de Deuxchaisnes C. Reproducibility of BMD measurements on the Hologic QDR-2000. Calcif Tissue Int 1993; 52:164 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis MK, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Patient dosimetry studies on the Hologic QDR-1000, QDR-1000/W and QDR-2000. Calcif Tissue Int 1993; 52:164 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lehmann R, Wapniarz M, Kvasnicka HM, Baedeker S, Klein K, Allolio B. Reproduzierbarkeit van Knochendichtemessungen am distalen Radius mit einem hochauflösenden Spezial scanner für periphere quantitative Computertomographie (single energy pQCT). Radiologe 1992; 32:177–181.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schneider P, Berner W, Rendl J, Eilles C, Schlisske K, Scheubeck M. Stellenwert zweier unterschiedlicher Knochendichtemessmethoden zur Bestimmung des Mineralgehalts am peripheren und axialen Skelett. Z Orthop 1992; 130:16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Langton C, Palmer SB, Porter RW. Measurement of broad-band ultrasonic attenuation in cancellous bone. Eng Med 1984; 13:89–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller CG, Herd RIM, Ramalingam T, Fogelman I, Blake GM. Ultrasonic velocity measurements through the calcaneus: which velocity should be measured? Osteoporosis Int 1993; 3:31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Porter RW, Miller CG, Graiinger D, Palmer SB. Prediction of hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective study. Br Med J 1990;301:638–641.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ryan PJ, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Measurement of forearm bone mineral density in normal women by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Br J Radiol 1992; 65:127–131.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stetten EC van, Berger N, Kelly TL, Stein JA. New applications of X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis Int 1991; 1:191 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Richmond BJ, Eberle RW, Stulberg BN, Deal CL. DEXA measurement of peri-prosthetic bone mineral density in total hip arthroplasty. Osteoporosis Int 1991; 1:191 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Trevisan C, Cherubini R, Ulivieri FM, Gondolini GG, Randelli G, Ortolani S. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in the evaluation of periprosthetic bone mineral status: analysis protocols and reproducibility. Osteoporosis Int 1991; 1:191 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Herd RJM, Blake GM, Parker JC, Ryan PJ, Fogelman I. Total body studies in normal British women using dual x-ray absorptiometry. Br J Radiol 1993; 66:303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kohrt W, Snead D, Rupich R, Birge S. Bone and soft tissue assessment with the QDR-1000/W. Osteoporosis Int 1991; 1:199 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson CR, Fogelman I. Lateral lumbar BMD with dual energy absorptiometry. In: Ring EFJ, ed. Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement. London: British Institute of Radiology 1990; 15–17 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Slosman DO, Rizzoli R, Donath A, Bonjour J-Ph. Vertebral bone mineral density measured laterally by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis Int 1990; 1:23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Uebelhart D, Duboeuf F, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD. Lateral dual photon absorptiometry: a new technique to measure the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 1990;5:525–531.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Devogelaer JP, Baudoux C, Nagant de Deuxchaisnes C. Lack of precision of the lumbar BMD measurements with the QDR-1000/W when the patients are lying in a lateral position. Calcif Tissue Int 1993; 52:163 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lilley J, Eyre S, Heath DA. In vivo and in vitro precision for BMD of the spine measured laterally using DEXA. In: Ring EFJ, ed. Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement II: 1992. London: British Institute of Radiology; 1992; 27–28 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Herd RJM, Blake GM, Parker JC, Ryan PJ, Fogelman I. Supine lateral is superior to decubitus lateral for dual x-ray absorptiometry studies of the lumbar spine. Nucl Med Commun 1993; 14:277 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kelly TL, Pomeroy M, Richardson TL, Stein JA. New developments in x-ray densitometry. In: Ring EFJ, ed. Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement. London: British Institute of Radiology 1990; 19–20 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's Hospital, St. Thomas Street, SE1, 9RT, London, UK

    G. M. Blake & I. Fogelman

Authors
  1. G. M. Blake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Fogelman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blake, G.M., Fogelman, I. Recent advances in bone densitometry. Eur J Nucl Med 20, 735–737 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180901

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180901

Search

Navigation