Skip to main content
Log in

Morphine conditioned place preference and locomotion: the effect of confinement during training

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of confinement during conditioning on subsequent test levels of locomotor activity and conditioned place preference (CPP) was investigated by giving rats discrimination training with morphine and saline in the presence of different tactile floor cues in an open field. Groups of rats were trained under one of three levels of confinement (not confined, confined to 1/4, or confined to 1/16 of the open field) and tested for locomotor activity and CPP in the entire open field after receiving a saline injection. Confined rats subsequently spent less time on the morphinepaired floor cues (CS+) and were more active throughout the open field during the test than rats not confined during conditioning. Rats confined to the smallest area spent the least time on the CS+ and were the most active. It is suggested that confinement may preserve the novelty of the testing environment, which in turn may interfere with rats' usual responses to incentive drug-paired stimuli. These findings may have important implications for versions of the CPP technique in which training and testing environments differ considerably.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardo MT, Miller JS, Neisewander JL (1984) Conditioned place preference with morphine: The effect of extinction training on the reinforcing CR. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 21:545–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindra D (1968) Neuropsychological interpretation of the effects of drive and incentive-motivation on general activity and instrumental behavior. Psychol Rev 75:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Blander A, Hunt T, Blair R, Amit Z (1984) Conditioned place preference: An evaluation of morphine's positive reinforcing properties. Psychopharmacology 84:124–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozarth MA (1987) Conditioned place preference: A parametric analysis using systemic heroin injections. In: Bozarth MA (ed) Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr GD, Phillips AG, Hancock S, Fibiger HC (1986) Dopamine, reward and locomotion: Amphetamine place preference is not dependent on locomotion. Can J Psychol 27:97

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen SD (1983) Brain endorphins and reward function: Some thoughts and speculations. In: Smith JE, Lane JD (eds) The neurobiology of opiate reward processes. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical, Amsterdam, pp 439–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk RE (1968) Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Cole, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucha RF, Iversen SD (1984) Reinforcing properties of morphine and naloxone revealed by conditioned place preference: A procedural examination. Psychopharmacology 82:241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff SR (1982) Conditioned dopaminergic activity. Biol Psychiatry 17:135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J, Eikelboom R (1987) Conditioned drug effects. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol 19. Plenum, New York, pp 1–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J, deWit H, Eikelboom R (1984) The role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants. Psychol Rev 91:251–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow NR, Koob GF (1984) Restrained rats learn amphetamine-conditioned locomotion, but not place preference. Psychopharmacology 84:163–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Kooy D (1987) Place conditioning: A simple and effective method for assessing the motivational properties of drugs. In: Bozarth MA (ed) Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vezina P, Stewart J (1984) Conditioning and place-specific sensitization of increases in activity induced by morphine in the VTA. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 20:925–934

    Google Scholar 

  • Vezina P, Stewart J (1987) Conditioned locomotion and place preference elicited by tactile cues paired exclusively with morphine in an open field. Psychopharmacology 91:375–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo PG, Montgomery KC (1957) The relative strengths of consummatory responses in hunger, thirst, and exploration drive. J Comp Physiol Psychol 50:504–508

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vezina, P., Stewart, J. Morphine conditioned place preference and locomotion: the effect of confinement during training. Psychopharmacology 93, 257–260 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00179944

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00179944

Key words

Navigation