References
Acheson, K., & Gall, M. (1987). Techniques in the clinical supervision of teachers (2nd ed.), New York: Longman.
Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.
Anderson, G. (1973). The assessment of learning environments: A manual for the learning environment inventory and my class inventory (2nd ed.), Halifax, Nova Scotia: Altantic Institute for Education.
Bass, B., Cascio, W., & O'Connor, E. (1974). Magnitude estimations of expressions of frequency and amount. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 313–320.
Berk, R. (Ed.) (1986). Performance assessment. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Berliner, D. (1987). Simple views of effective teaching and a simple theory of classroom instruction. In D. Berliner & B. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers. New York: Random House.
Blanz, R., & Ghiselli, E. (1972). The mixed standard scale: A new rating system. Personnel Psychology, 25, 185–200.
Bolton, D. (1973). Selection and evaluation of teachers. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Borman, W. (1986). Behavior-based rating scales. In R. Berk (Ed.), Performance assessment. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Brophy, J. (1988). Research on teacher effects: Uses and abuses. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 3–23.
Cooper, W. (1981). Ubiquitous halo. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 218–244.
Dickson, G., Jurs, S., Wening, J., & Wiersma, W. (1982). The analysis and interpretation of student teacher observation data use for measuring teacher competencies. Paper read at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Dickson, G. & Wiersma, W. (1980). Research and evaluation in teacher education: A concern for competent, effective teachers, Toledo, OH: The University of Toledo.
Duke, D. & Stiggins, R. (1986). Five keys to growth through teacher evaluation. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Evertson, C., & Holley, F. (1981) Classroom observation. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Good, T., Brophy, J. (4th ed.), (1987). Looking in classrooms, New York: Harper & Row.
Hunter, M. (1984). Knowing, teaching, and supervising. In P. Hosford (Ed.). Using what we know about teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Hunter, M. (1988). Create rather than await your fate in teacher evaluation. In S. Stanley & J. Popham (Eds.), Teacher evaluation: Six prescriptions for success. Alexandria, VA: Association for Suprevision and Curriculum Development.
Hyman, R. (1986). School administrator's faculty supervision handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Jacobs, R. (1986). Numerical rating scales. In R Berk (Ed.), Performance assessment. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kafry, D., Jacobs, R., & Zedeck, S. (1979). Discriminability in multidimensional performance evaluations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 187–192.
Latham, G., Fay, C., & Saari, L. (1979). The development of behavioral observation scales for appraising the performance of forement. Personnel Psychology, 32, 299–311.
Latham, G., & Wexley, K. (1981). Increasing productivity through performance appraisal. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
McGreal, T. (1983). Successful teacher evaluation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McGreal, T. (1988a). Evaluation for enhancing instruction: Linking teacher evaluation with staff development. In S. Stanley & J. Popham (Eds.), Teacher evaluation: Six prescriptions for success. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McGreal, T. (1988b). Verbal and written feedback: An important component of successful teacher evaluation systems. SAANYS Journal, 19, 9–13.
Manatt, R., & Peterson, D. (1988). Effects of bias and reliability on performance evaluation of teachers. SAANYS Journal, 19, 5–9.
Medley, D., Coker, H., & Soar, R. (1984). Measurement-based evaluation of teacher performance. New York: Longman.
Merchant, J. (1988). Teacher appraisal: The Texas experience. SAANYS Journal, 19, 13–17.
Nathan, B., & Cascio, W. (1986). Technical and legal standards. In R. Berk (Ed.), Performance assessment. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Phelps, L., Schmitz, C., & Boatright, B. (1986). The effects of halo and leniency on cooperating teacher reports using Likert-type rating scales. Journal of Educational Research. 79, 151–154.
Popham, J. (1988). Judgement-based teacher evaluation. In S. Stanley & J. Popham (Eds.), Teacher evaluation: Six prescriptions for success. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Porter, A., & Brophy, J. (1988). Synthesis of research on good teaching: Insights from the work of the Institute for Research on Teaching. Educational Leadership, 45, 74–85.
Rosenshine, B. (1987). Explicit teaching. In D. Berliner & B. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers. New York: Random House.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
Shulman, L. (1988). A union of insufficiencies: Strategies for teacher assessment in a period of educational reform. Educational Leadership. 46, 36–41.
Smith, P., & Kendall, L. (1963). Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 149–155.
Stiggins, R. (1986). Teacher evaluation: Accountability and growth systems, different purposes. NASSP Bulletin, 70, 51–58.
Stiggins, R., & Bridgeford, N. (1985). Performance assessment for teacher development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7, 85–97.
Stiggins, R., & Duke, D. (1988). The case for commitment to teacher growth: Research on teacher evaluation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Strike, K., & Bull, B. (1981). Fairness and the legal context of teacher evaluation. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Sweeny, J., & Manatt, R. (1984). A team approach to supervising the marginal teacher: Educational Leadership, 41, 25–27.
Wheeler, A., & Knoop, H. (1982). Self, teacher, and faculty assessments of student teaching performance. Journal of Educational Research. 75, 175–181.
Wise, A., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M., & Bernstein, H. (1984). Teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McGreal, T.L. The use of rating scales in teacher evaluation: Concerns and recommendations. J Pers Eval Educ 4, 41–58 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177129
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177129