Skip to main content
Log in

Extra-pair paternity and the opportunity for sexual selection in a socially monogamous bird (Dendroica petechia)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We used multi-locus DNA fingerprinting to characterise the genetic mating system of the socially monogamous yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia). Over 2 years there were no instances of brood parasitism, but 59% of families (n = 90) contained extrapair sired young and 37% of offspring (n = 355) were of extra-pair paternity. Most hypotheses for extra-pair mating in monogamous species assume a paternity benefit to extra-pair sires, and focus on the benefit(s) to females. However, the assumption of male benefit has been little tested. Among yellow warblers, known extra-pair sires were just as likely to be cuckolded as any male in the population, and there was at least one reciprocal exchange of extra-pair paternity. Nevertheless, among known extra-pair sires, the paternity gains from extra-pair paternity were, on average, greater than the losses in their own families. These results show there is a paternity benefit to certain males. However, the benefit is not absolute but relative and therefore more difficult to measure. The results also suggest that patterns of extra-pair fertilisation are not determined by female choice alone. Most confirmed extra-pair mates were territorial neighbours, but some resided as far as three territories apart, and greater spatial separation was implied in other cases. Thus, the opportunity for extra-pair mating is great. We estimate that as a result of extra-pair fertilisations, variance in male mating success is increased somewhere between 3-fold and 15-fold over that which would result from within-pair reproduction alone. These findings affirm the potential importance of extra-pair reproduction for sexual selection in monogamous species and they support earlier suggestions that extra-territorial forays by male yellow warblers are for the purpose of extra-pair mating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amos W, Barrett JA, Pemberton JM (1992) DNA fingerprinting: parentage studies in natural populations and the importance of linkage analysis. Proc R Soc Lond B 249:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SJ, Wade MJ (1984) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead T, Moller AP (1993) Female control of paternity. Trends Ecol Evol 8:100–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Burke T, Zann R, Hunter FM, Krupa AP (1990) Extra-pair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism in wild zebra finches Taeniopygia gutta, revealed by DNA finger-printing. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:315–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Moller AP (1992) Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield JF, Carter RE, Mair GC, Skibinski DOF (1993) A case study of the interpretation of linkage data using DNA fingerprinting probes. Mol Ecol 2:209–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruford MW, Hanotte O, Brookfield JFY, Burke T (1992) Single-locus and multi-locus DNA fingerprinting. In: Hoelzel R (ed) Molecular genetic analysis of populations: a practical approach. IRL, Oxford, pp 225–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke T, Bruford MW (1987) DNA fingerprinting in birds. Nature 327:149–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • DellaSalla DA (1986) Polygyny in the yellow warbler. Wilson Bull 98:152–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn PO, Robertson RJ, Michaud-Freeman D, Boag PT (1994) Extra-pair paternity in tree swallows: why do females mate with more than one male? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:273–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R (1930) Genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford N (1983) Variations in mate fidelity in monogamous birds. In: Power DM (ed) Current ornithology. Plenum, New York, pp 329–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA (1985) Multiple parentage and apparent monogamy in birds. Ornithol Monogr 37:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyllensten UB, Jakobsson S, Temrin H (1990) No evidence for illegitimateyoung in monogamous and polygynous warblers. Nature 343:168–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1990) Mate choice near or far. Am Zool 30: 341–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Hébert PN (1993) An experimental study of brood reduction and hatching asynchrony in yellow warblers. Condor 95:362–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (1990) Female house finches prefer colourful males: sexual selection for a condition-dependent trait. Anim Behav 40:563–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (1991) Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350:337–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE, Montgomerie R, Roeder C, Boag P (1994) Sexual selection and cuckoldry in a monogamous songbird: implications for sexual selection theory. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson KA, Sealy SG (1989) Mate guarding in the yellow warbler Dendroica petechia. Ornis Scand 20:241–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoysak DJ, Weatherhead PJ (1991) Sampling blood from birds: a technique and an assessment of its effect. Condor 93:746–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter FM, Burke T, Watts SE (1992) Frequent copulation as a method of paternity assurance in the northern fulmar. Anim Behav 44:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter FM, Petrie M, Otronen M, Birkhead T, Moller AP (1993) Why do females copulate repeatedly with one male? Trends Ecol Evol 8:21–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Them SL (1985) Hypervariable “minisatellite” regions in human DNA. Nature 314:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers B, Dhondt AA (1993) Why do females engage in extra-pair copulations? a review of hypotheses and their predictions. Belg J Zool 123:93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers B, Verheyen GR, Van den Broeck M, Dhondt AA (1992) Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high-quality males in the blue tit. Nature 357:494–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Price T, Arnold SJ (1990) The Darwin-Fisher theory of sexual selection in monogamous birds. Evolution 44:180–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifjeld IT, Dunn PO, Robertson RJ, Boag PT (1993) Extra-pair paternity in monogamous tree swallows. Anim Behav 45:213–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz FW (1966) Behavior of spermatozoa in the oviduct in relation to fertility. In: Horton-Smith C, Amorose EC (ed) Physiology of the domestic fowl. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • McKitrick MC (1990) Genetic evidence for multiple parentage in eastern kingbirds (Tyrannus tyrannus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:149–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore FR, McDonald MV (1993) On the possibility that intercontinental landbird migrants copulate enroute. Auk 110:157–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton ES, Forman L, Braun M (1990) Extrapair fertilizations and the evolution of colonial breeding in purple martins. Auk 107:275–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder RA, Dunn PO, Cockburn A, Lazenby-Cohen KA, Howell MJ (1994) Helpers liberate female fairy-wrens from constraints on extra-pair mate choice. Proc R Soc Lond B 255:223–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller A (1986) Mating systems among European passerines: a review. Ibis 128:234–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Strassmann JE, Hughes CR (1993) Microsatellites and kinship. Trends Ecol Evol 8:285–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid ML, Sealy SG (1986) Behavior of a polygynous yearling yellow warbler. Wilson Bull 98:315–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Sealy SG (1984) Extra-pair copulation in the yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia). Anim Behav 32:295–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander RK (1972) Sexual selection and dimorphism in birds. In: Campbell BG (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 200–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Seutin G, White BN, Boag PT (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tisue samples for DNA analyses. Can J Zool 69:82–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin HS, Bargiello TA, Clark BT, Jackson FR, Young MW (1985) An unusual coding sequence from a Drosophila clock gene is conserved in vertebrates. Nature 317:445–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JMN, Arcese P (1989) How fit are floaters? Consequences of alternative territorial behaviors in a nonmigratory sparrow. Am Nat 133:830–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SM (1988) Extra-pair copulations in black-capped chickadees: the role of the female. Behaviour 107:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell BG (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ (1979) Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. Am Nat 114:742–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ (1987) Measuring sexual selection. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives Wiley, Chichester, pp 197–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ, Arnold SJ (1980) The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behaviour, female choice, and sperm precedence. Anim Behav 28:446–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF (1987) Extra-pair fertilizations in a predominantly monogamous bird: genetic evidence. Anim Behav 35:877–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF (1990) Genetic parentage in the indigo bunting: a study using DNA fingerprinting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF (1993) Polygyny and extra-pair fertilizations in eastern red-winged blackbirds (Ageliaus phoeniceus). Behav Ecol 4:49–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Noon WA, Reeve HK, Aquadro CF (1989) Improved hybridization conditions for DNA “fingerprints” probed with M13. Nucleic Acids Res 16:4161

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Sherman PW, Morton ML (1990) The ecology and evolution of extra-pair copulations in birds. In: Power DM (ed) Current ornithology. Plenum, New York, pp 331–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetton J, Carter RE, Parkin DT, Walters D (1987) Demographic study of a wild house sparrow population by DNA fingerprinting. Nature 327:147–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by M. Zuk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yezerinac, S.M., Weatherhead, P.J. & Boag, P.T. Extra-pair paternity and the opportunity for sexual selection in a socially monogamous bird (Dendroica petechia). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37, 179–188 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176715

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176715

Key words

Navigation