Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting the allocation of paternal care in waterbugs (Belostoma flumineum Say)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Male giant waterbugs (Belostoma flumineum Say) brood eggs oviposited on their dorsa by conspecific females. Laboratory observations indicate that viable egg pads are occasionally discarded before hatching. Theory predicts that such behavior should occur only if the costs incurred by brooding exceed the benefits of hatching the egg pad. We studied the effects of egg pad size, time invested in brooding, and egg viability upon the continuation of paternal care in the giant waterbug. We found that smaller egg pads are less likely to hatch than larger ones, and males appear to be less likely to discard egg pads as temporal investment increases. However, the inviability of eggs did not appear to affect the probability of an egg pad being discarded. Males of this species appear to have evolved a decision-making process involving the continuation of paternal care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M, Wiklund C, Rundgren H (1980) Parental defence of offspring: a model and an example. Anim Behav 28:536–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong T, Robertson RJ (1988) Parental investment based on clutch value: nest desertion in response to partial clutch loss in dabbling ducks. Anim Behav 36:941–943

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann GC, Robertson RJ (1981) An increase in parental investment during the breeding season. Anim Behav 29:487–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann GC, Robertson RJ (1983) Residual reproductive value and parental investment. Anim Behav 31:311–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Blancher PJ, Robertson RJ (1982) Kingbird aggression: does it deter predation? Anim Behav 30:929–930

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher DH (1977) On wasting parental investment. Am Nat 111:786–788

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle TR (1982) Brood success in variable environments: implications for parental care allocation. Anim Behav 30:824–836

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle TR (1985) Parental response to brood size in a cichlid fish. Anim Behav 33:234–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman RM, Gross MR, Sargent RC (1985) Parental investment decision rules: a test in bluegill sunfish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Colgan PW, Gross MR (1977) Dynamics of aggression in male pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) over the reproductive phase. Z Tierpsychol 43:139–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen MJ (1969) The biology of giant water bugs (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae) in Trinidad. Proc R Entomol Soc Lond (A) 44:123–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1988) Relative realized life span and delayed cost of parental care. Am Nat 131:825–836

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E, Regelmann K (1987) Do great tit Parus major parents gear their brood defence to the quality of their young? Ibis 129:344–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E, Regelmann K, Zimmermann U (1984) The defence of first and second broods by great tit (Parus major) parents: a test of predictive sociobiology. Z Tierpsychol 66:101–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R, Carlisle TR (1976) Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy. Nature 262:131–133

    Google Scholar 

  • East M (1981) Alarm calling and parental investment in the robin, Erithacus rubecula. Ibis 123:223–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerström T (1982) Maternal investment, female rivalry, and a fallacy. Oikos 39:116–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith PW (1980) Parental investment in nest defence by stonechats (Saxicola torquata). Anim Behav 28:604–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopelke J (1980) Morphologische und biologische Studien an Belostomatiden am Beispiel der mittelamerikanischen Arten Belostoma ellipticum und B. thomasi (Heteroptera). Ent Abh Mus Tierk Dresden 44:59–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus WF, Gonzales MJ, Vehrencamp SL (1989) Egg development and an evaluation of some of the costs and benefits for paternal care in the belostomatid, Abedus indentatus (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 62:548–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse KC (1990) Male backspace availability in the giant waterbug (Belostoma flumineum Say). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:281–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauck DR, Menke AS (1961) The higher classification of the Belostomatidae (Hemiptera). Ann Entomol Soc Am 54:644–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1977) Parental investment: a prospective analysis. Anim Behav 25:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock DW, Parker GA (1986) Advantages and disadvantages of egret and heron brood reduction. Evolution 40:459–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q Rev Biol 63:167–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1976) Natural selection of optimal reproductive tactics. Am Zool 16:775–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley PH (1981) Parental effort and the evolution of nest-guarding tactics in the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Evolution 35:282–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Redondo T, Carranza J (1989) Offspring reproductive value and nest defense in the magpie (Pica pica). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:369–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid MC, Montgomerie RD (1985) Seasonal patterns of nest defence by Baird's sandpipers. Can J Zool 63:2207–2211

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (1969) An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithson Contrib Zool 9:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (1977) On the evolution of reproductive strategies in birds: reproductive effort. Am Nat 111:453–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent RC, Gross MR (1985) Parental investment decision rules and the Concorde fallacy. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:43–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent RC, Gross MR (1986) Williams' principle: an explanation of parental care in teleost fishes. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) The behaviour of teleost fishes. Croom Helm, London, pp 275–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer NM (1974a) Selection for optimal life histories: the effects of age structure. Ecology 55:291–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer NM (1974b) Optimal reproductive effort in fluctuating environments. Am Nat 108:783–790

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL (1974) Life history of Abedus herberti in central Arizona (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae). Psyche 81:272–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL (1976) Brooding behavior of a male water bug Belostoma flumineum (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 49:333–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL (1979a) Repeated copulation and sperm precedence: paternity assurance for a male brooding water bug. Science 205:1029–1031

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL (1979b) Paternity assurance and altered roles in the mating behaviour of a giant water bug, Abedus herberti (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae). Anim Behav 27:716–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait DEN (1980) Abandonment as a reproductive tactic — the example of grizzly bears. Am Nat 115:800–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallamy DW (1982) Age specific maternal defense in Gargaphia solani (Hemiptera: Tingidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:7–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallamy DW (1984) Insect parental care. Bioscience 34:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre Bueno JR de la (1906) Life histories of North American water bugs. I. Life history of Belostoma flumineum Say. Can Entomol 38:189–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine Press, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Usinger RL (1956) Aquatic Hemiptera. In: Usinger RL (ed) Aquatic insects of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 182–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters JR (1982) Parental behavior in lapwings (Charadriidae) and its relationships with clutch sizes and mating systems. Evolution 36:1030–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ (1979) Do savannah sparrows commit the Concorde fallacy? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:373–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Westmoreland D (1989) Offspring age and nest defence in mourning doves: a test of two hypotheses. Anim Behav 38:1062–1066

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966a) Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am Nat 100:687–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966b) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler DW (1987) A general model for parental care. Am Nat 130:526–543

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberger JF (1981) Animal social behavior. Duxbury Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: K.C. Kruse

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kight, S.L., Kruse, K.C. Factors affecting the allocation of paternal care in waterbugs (Belostoma flumineum Say). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30, 409–414 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176176

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176176

Keywords

Navigation