Skip to main content
Log in

Relatedness and sex ratio in a primitively eusocial halictine bee

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lasioglossum laevissimum was studied in Calgary, Alberta, where it is eusocial with one worker brood. Estimates of relatedness were obtained among various categories of nestmate based upon four polymorphic enzyme loci, two of which exhibited significant levels of linkage disequilibrium. Relatedness estimates among workers and among reproductive brood females were very close to the expected 0.75 value that obtains when nests are headed by one, singly mated queen. However, relatedness between workers and the reproductive brood females they reared was significantly lower than 0.75. A low frequency of orphaning with subsequent monopolisation of oviposition by one worker brood female in orphaned nests may explain these results. Workers were significantly more and queens significantly less closely related to male reproductives than expected if all males were to have resulted from queen-laid eggs. Orphaning and worker-produced males contribute to this result. The sex investment ratio was 1:2.2 in favour of females, in excellent agreement with the predictions based upon relative relatednesses between workers and reproductive brood males and females. Adaptive intercolony variation in investment ratios was detected: the sex ratio was more heavily female-biased in nests in which the relative relatedness asymmetry between workers and reproductive brood was more female-biased. The study species is the most weakly eusocial hymenopteran for which relatedness estimates and sex ratio data are available. With high relatedness among nestmates and a strongly female-biased sex ratio, this study suggests the importance of indirect fitness contributions in the early stages of social evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M (1984) The evolution of eusociality. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:325–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra SWT (1966) Life cycle and behavior of the primitively social bee, Lasioglossum zephyrum. Univ Kans Sci Bull 46:359–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ (1989) Sex-investment ratios in ants: has female bias been systematically overestimated? Am Nat 133:517–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ (1991) Adaptive colony sex ratios in primitively social bees. Trends Ecol Evol 6:92–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ, Grafen A (1990) Intraspecific variation in ant sex ratios and the Trivers-Hare hypothesis. Evolution 44:1026–1034

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ, Grafen A (1991) Colony-level sex ratio selection in the eusocial Hymenoptera. J Evol Biol 3:383–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandao CRF, Martins-Netos RG, Vulcano MA (1989) The earliest known fossil ant (first southern hemisphere Mesozoic record) (Hymenoptera; Formicidae: Myrmecinae). Psyche 96:195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Breed MD (1976) The evolution of social behavior in primitively eusocial bees: a multivariate analysis. Evolution 30:234–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter JM (1989) Testing scenarios: wasp social behavior. Cladistics 5:131–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1982) The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH (1979) Genetics of eusociality. In: Hermann HR (ed) Social insects, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 223–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH, Smith BH, Crozier YC (1987) Relatedness and population structure of the primitively eusocial bee Lasioglossum zephyrum (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) in Kansas. Evolution 41:902–910

    Google Scholar 

  • Danforth BN (1990) Provisioning behavior and the estimation of investment ratios in a solitary bee, Calliopsis (Hypomacrotera) persimilis (Cockerell) (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans HE (1977) Extrinsic versus intrinsic factors in the evolution of insect sociality. Bioscience 27:613–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank SA, Crespi BJ (1989) Synergism between sib-rearing and sex ratio in Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadagkar R (1991) On testing the role of generic asymmetries created by haplodiploidy in the evolution of eusociality in the Hymenoptera. J Genet 70:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1986) Split sex ratios and the evolutionary origins of eusociality. J Theor Biol 122:95–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1970) Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature 228:1218–1220

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1972) Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 3:193–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WG (1974) Estimation of linkage disequilibrium in randomly mating populations. Heredity 33:229–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukuk PF (1989) Evolutionary genetics of a primitively eusocial halictine bee, Dialictus zephyums. In: Page RE, Breed MD (eds) The genetics of social evolution. Westview, Boulder, pp 183–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RW (1991) Evolution of social behavior in sphecid wasps. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Comstock, Ithaca, pp 570–602

    Google Scholar 

  • May B, Marsden JE, Schenck CG (1988) Electrophoretic procedures, recipes and nomenclature used in the Cornell laboratory for ecological and evolutionary genetics. Unpublished manuall

  • Metcalf RA (1980) Sex ratios, parent-offspring conflict, and local competition for mates in the social wasps Polistes metricus and Polistes variatus. Am Nat 116:642–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD (1974) The social behavior of the bees. Belknap, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD (1990) Reproduction and castes in social halictine bees. In: Engels W (ed) Social insects: an evolutionary approach to castes and reproduction. Springer, Berlin, pp 77–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller UG (1991) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of facultative sex ratios in a primitively eusocial bee. Science 254:442–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer L (1986) Aspects of the social organisation of Halictus ligatus. Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer L (1992) The social organisation of Lasioglossum (Dialictus) laevissimum in southern Alberta. Can J Zool 70:1767–1774

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer L, Knerer G (1985) Social evolution and its correlates in bees of the subgenus Evylaeus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P (1991) Evolution of colony characteristics in social insects I. Sex allocation. Am Nat 137:83–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Plateaux-Quénu C (1983) Le volume d'un pain d'abeille influence-til le sexe de l'oeuf pondu sur lui? Étude expérimentale portant sur la prémiére couvée d'Evylaeus calceatus (Stop.) (Hym., Halictinae). Actes Coll Insectes Soc 1:225–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgway GL, Sherburne SU, Lewis RD (1970) Polymorphism in the esterases of Atlantic herring. Trans Am Fish Soc 99:147–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross KG, Matthews RW (1989a) New evidence for eusociality in the sphecid wasp Microstigmus comes. Anim Behav 38:613–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross KG, Matthews RW (1989b) Population genetic structure and social evolution in the sphecid wasp Microstigmus comes. Am Nat 134:574–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami SF (1974) Sozialstruktur und Polymorphismus bei Furchen-und Schmalbienen. In: Schmidt GH (ed) Sozialpolymorphismus bei Insekten. Wissenschaft Verlagsgesell, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw CR, Prasad R (1970) Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes — a compilation of recipes. Biochem Genet 4:291–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Castellan NJ Jr (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubblefield JW, Charnov EL (1986) Some conceptual issues in the origin of eusociality. Heredity 57:181–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD (1988) Inclusive fitness models with two sexes. Theor Popul Biol 34:145–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191:249–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Wcislo WT, Wille A, Orozco E (1993) Nesting biology of tropical solitary and social sweat bees, Lasioglossum (Dialictus) figueresi Wcislo and L. (D.) aeniventre (Friese) (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Insectes Soc 40:21–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb EC (1984) Enzyme nomenclature: recommendations of the nomenclature committee of the international union of biochemistry on the nomenclature and classification of enzyme-catalysed reactions. Academic Press, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel JW (1990) A social wasp's nest from the Cretaceous period, Utah, USA, and its biogeographic significance. Psyche 97:21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanega D (1989) Caste determination and differential diapause within the first brood of Halictus rubicundus in New York (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:97–107

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: L. Packer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Packer, L., Owen, R.E. Relatedness and sex ratio in a primitively eusocial halictine bee. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34, 1–10 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175452

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175452

Key words

Navigation