Skip to main content
Log in

Reversal and nonreversal shifts under amphetamine

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rats were trained in a Y maze on a two-choice simultaneous brightness discrimination with light as S+ and dark as S (position irrelevant). Half of the animals were then switched to reversal, where the reinforcement contingencies of the original training were reversed, and the other half were switched to nonreversal, in which they learned a simultaneous right-left discrimination. Nonreversal was acquired faster than reversal in saline injected animals. The administration of 1 mg/kg d-amphetamine did not affect the acquisition of the initial brightness discrimination and of nonreversal. In contrast, the drug facilitated dramatically reversal learning.

The results indicate that amphetamine enhances the attention to, or the associability of, the discriminative stimuli, leading to rapid learning to these stimuli under changed contingencies of reinforcement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlenius S, Carlsson A, Engel J (1975). Antagonism by baclophen of the d-amphetamine-induced disruption of successive discrimination in the rat. J Neural Transm 36:327–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleuler E (1966) Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenias. Academic Press, New York (originally published in 1911)

    Google Scholar 

  • Broen WE (1968) Schizophrenia: Research and theory. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire KH, Warren JM, Ball GB (1961) Reversal and transfer following overtraining in rat and chicken. J Comp Physiol Psychol 54:98–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun WH, Jones EA (1974) Methamphetamine's effect on repeated acquisition with serial discrimination reversals. Psychopharmacologia 39:303–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenden JL, Robbins TW (1983) Dissociable effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide and α-flupenthixol on choice and rate measures of reinforcement in the rat. Psychopharmacology 79:180–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenden JL, Robbins TW (1985) The effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide and alpha-flupenthixol on food reinforced tracking of a visual stimulus by rats. Psychopharmacology 85:361–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith CD (1979) Consciousness, information processing and schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 134:225–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise GA, Lilie NL (1970) Effects of scopolamine, atropine and d-amphetamine on internal and external control of responding on non-reinforced trials. Psychopharmacologia 18:38–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise GA, Milar KS (1984) Drug and stimulus control. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of Psychopharmacology, Vol 18, Plenum Press, New York, pp 129–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RT (1970) Facilitation of conditioned reinforcement as a mechanism of psychomotor stimulation. In: Costa E, Garattini S (eds) Amphetamine and related compounds. Raven Press, New York, pp 781–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher RT (1956) Discrimination learning as a function of reversal and nonreversal shifts. J Exp Psychol 51:379–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Koek W, Slangen JL (1983) Effects of d-amphetamine and morphine on discrimination: signal detection analysis and assessment of response repetition in the performance deficits. Psychopharmacology 80:125–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinidis L, Anisman H (1980) Amphetamine models of paranoid schizophrenia: An overview and elaboration of animal experimentation. Psychol Bull 3:551–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Ksir C (1975) Scopolamine and amphetamine effects on discrimination: interaction with stimulus control, Psychopharmacologia 43:37–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Ksir C, Slifer B (1982) Drug effects on discrimination performance at two levels of stimulus control. Psychopharmacology 76:286–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulig BM, Calhoun WH (1972) Enhancement of successive discrimination reversal learning by methamphetamine. Psychopharmacologia 27:233–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon M, Robbins TW (1975) The action of central nervous system stimulant drugs: a general theory concerning amphetamine effects. In: Essman WB, Valzelli L (eds) Current developments in psychopharmacology, vol 2. Spectrum, New York, pp 79–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh NJ (1962) The effect of overtraining and reversal and nonreversal shift. J Comp Physiol Psychol 55:555–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh NJ (1974) The psychology of animal learning. London, Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh NJ (1983) Conditioning and associative learning. Oxford University Press: New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Magaro PA (1980) Cognition in schizophrenia and paranoia: the intergration of cognitive processes. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthysse S, Spring BJ, Sugarman J (eds) (1979) Attention and information processing in schizophrenia. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerschbaecher JM, Thompson DM (1980) Effects of phencyclidine, pentobarbital and d-amphetamine on the acquisition and performance of conditional discriminations in monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 13:887–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen EB (1981) Effects of d-amphetamine and LSD on simultaneous discrimination. In: Bradshaw CM, Sabadi E, Lowe CF (eds) Quantification of steady-state operant behavior. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 461–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen EB, Appel JB (1983) The effects of drugs on the discrimination of color following a variable delay period: A signal detection analysis. Psychopharmacology 80:24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne RW (1966) The measurement and significance of overinclusive thinking and retardation in schizophrenic patients. In: Hoch P, Zubin J (eds) Psychopathology of schizophrenia. Grune and Stratton, New York, pp 77–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley RM, Baker HF, Haystead TAJ (1981a) Perseverative behavior after amphetamine: Dissociation of response tendency from reward association. Psychopharmacology 25:283–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley RM, Haystead TAJ, Baker HF (1981b) An analysis of visual object reversal learning in the marmoset after amphetamine and haloperidol. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 14:345–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ (1983) Behavioral effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs: clinical and neuropsychological implications. In: Creese I (ed) Stimulants: Neurochemical, behavioral and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York, pp 301–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal DS, Janowsky DW (1978) Psychostimulant-induced behavioral effects: Possible models of schizophrenia. In: Lipton A, DiMascio A, Killam KF (eds) Psychopharmacology: A generation of progress. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal DS, Schuckit MA (1983) Animal models of stimulant-induced psychosis. In: I Creese (ed), Stimulants: Neurochemical, behavioral and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakow D (1962) Segmental set: A theory of the formal psychological deficit in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 6:17–33

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon PR, Crider A, Winkelman JW, Turi A, Kramer RM, Kaplan IJ (1981) Disrupted latent inhibition in the rat with chronic amphetamine or haloperidol-induced supersensitivity: Relationship to schizophrenic attention disorder. Biol Psychiatry 16:619–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein L (1964) Self-stimulation of the brain and the central stimulant action of amphetamine. Fed Proc 23:836–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland NS, Mackintosh NJ (1971) Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tighe TJ (1964) Reversal and nonreversal shifts in monkeys. J Com Physiol Psychol 58:324–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner I, Ben-Horin E, Feldon J (1986) Amphetamine and the overtraining reversal effect. Pharmacol Biochem Behav (in press)

  • Weiner I, Bercovitz H, Feldon J (1985) The abolition of the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) by amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 86:318–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner I, Lubow RE, Feldon J (1981) Chronic amphetamine and latent inhibition. Behav Brain Res 2:285–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner I, Lubow RE, Feldon J (1984) Abolition of the expression but not the acquisition of latent inhibition by chronic amphetamine in rats. Psychopharmacology 83:194–199

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint request to: I. Weiner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiner, I., Feldon, J. Reversal and nonreversal shifts under amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 89, 355–359 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174374

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174374

Key words

Navigation