Skip to main content
Log in

The contribution of slippage-like processes to genome evolution

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simple sequences present in long (>30 kb) sequences representative of the single-copy genome of five species (Homo sapiens, Caenorhabditis elegans Saccharomyces cerevisiae, E. coli, and Mycobacterium leprae) have been analyzed. A close relationship was observed between genome size and the overall level of sequence repetition. This suggested that the incorporation of simple sequences had accompanied increases of genome size during evolution. Densities of simple sequence motifs were higher in noncoding regions than in coding regions in eukaryotes but not in eubacteria. All five genomes showed very biased frequency distributions of simple sequence motifs in all species, particularly in eukaryotes where AAA and TTT predominated. Interspecific comparisons showed that noncoding sequences in eukaryotes showed highly significantly similar frequency distributions of simple sequence motifs but this was not true of coding sequences. ANOVA of the frequency distributions of simple sequence motifs indicated strong contributions from motif base composition and repeat unit length, but much of the variation remained unexplained by these parameters. The sequence composition of simple sequences therefore appears to reflect both underlying sequence biases in slippage-like processes and the action of selection. Frequency distributions of simple sequence motifs in coding sequences correlated weakly or not at all with those in noncoding sequences. Selection on coding sequences to eliminate undesirable sequences may therefore have been strong, particularly in the human lineage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bebenek K, Kunkel TA (1990) Frameshift errors initiated by nucleotide misincorporation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:4946–4950

    Google Scholar 

  • Behn-Krappa A, Doerfler W (1994) Enzymatic amplification of synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides—implications for triplet repeat expansions in the human genome. Hum Mutat 3:19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson DA, Boguski M, Lipman DJ, Ostell J (1994) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 22:3441–3444

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith T (1978) Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and cell growth rate, and the solution of the DNA C-value paradox. J Cell Sci 34:247–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith T (1985) Eukaryotic gene numbers, non-coding DNA and genome size. In: Cavalier-Smith T (ed) The evolution of genome size. John Wiley, New York, pp 69–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels DL, Plunkett III G, Burland V, Blattner FR (1992) Analysis of the Escherichia coli genome: DNA sequence of the region from 84.5 to 86.5 minutes. Science 257:771–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Dujon B, 107 others (1994) Complete DNA sequence of yeast chromosome XI. Nature 369:371–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiglmeier K, Honore N, Woods SA (1993) Use of an ordered cosmid library to deduce the genomic organization of Mycobacterium leprae. Mol Microbiol 7:197–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Genetics Computer Group (1994) Program manual for the Wisconsin package, version 8. Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock JM (1993) Evolution of sequence repetition and gene duplications in the TATA-binding protein TBP (TFIID). Nucleic Acids Res 21:2823–2830

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock JM (1995) The contribution of DNA slippage to eukaryotic nuclear 18S rRNA evolution. J Mol Evol 40:629–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock JM, Armstrong JS (1994) SIMPLE34: an improved and enhanced implementation for VAX and Sun computers of the SIMPLE algorithm for analysis of clustered repetitive motifs in nucleotide sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 10:67–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock JM, Dover GA (1988) Molecular coevolution among cryptically simple expansion segments of eukaryotic 26S/28S rRNAs. Mol Biol Evol 5:377–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock JM, Dover GA (1990) Compensatory slippage in the evolution of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 18:5949–5954

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelzel AR, Hancock JM, Dover GA (1991) Evolution of the cetacean mitochondrial D-loop region. Mol Biol Evol 8:475–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelzel AR, Hancock JM, Dover GA (1993) Generation of VNTRs and heteroplasmy by sequence turnover in the mitochondrial control region of two elephant seal species. J Mol Evol 37:190–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain HK (1980) Incidental DNA. Nature 288:647–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys AJ, Tamaki K, MacLeod A, Monckton DG, Neil DL, Armour JAL (1994) Complex gene conversion events in germline mutation at human microsatellites. Nature Genet 6:136–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurka J, Walichiewicz J, Miloslavljevic A (1992) Prototypic sequences for human repetitive DNA. J Mol Evol 35:286–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurka J, Kaplan DJ, Duncan CH, Walichiewicz J, Miloslavljevic J, Miloslavljevic A, Murali G, Solus JF (1993) Identification and characterization of new human medium reiteration frequency repeats. Nucleic Acids Res 21:1273–1279

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop BF, Hood L (1994) Striking sequence similarity over almost 100 kilobases of human and mouse T-cell receptor DNA. Nature Genet 7:48–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson G, Gutman GA (1987) Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol 4:203–221

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Nicolaou C (1994) Chemical self-replication of palindromic duplex DNA. Nature 369:218–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenauer-Kaligis EGR, Thijssen J, Den Dulk H, Van De Putte P, Tasseron-De Jong JG, Giphart-Gassler M (1993) Genome wide spontaneous mutation in human cells determined by the spectrum of mutations in hprt cDNA genes. Mutagenesis 8:207–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry (NC-IUB) (1985) Nomenclature for incompletely specified bases in nucleic acid sequences. Eur J Biochem 150:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson WR, Lipman DJ (1988) Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:2444–2448

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards RI, Sutherland GR (1994) Simple repeat DNA is not replicated simply. Nature Genet 6:114–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinsztein DC, Amos W, Leggo J, Goodbum S, Ramesar RS, Old J, Bontrop R, McMahon R, Barton DE, Ferguson-Smith MA (1994) Mutational bias provides a model for the evolution of Huntington's disease and predicts a general increase in disease prevalence. Nature Genet 7:525–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Rysavy FR, Bishop MJ, Gibbs GP, Williams GW (1992) The UK Human Genome Mapping Project online computing service. Comput Appl Biosci 8:149–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlötterer C, Tautz D (1992) Slippage synthesis of simple sequence DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 20:211–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp PM, Lloyd AT (1993) Regional base composition variation along yeast chromosome III: evolution of chromosome primary structure. Nucleic Acids Res 21:179–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Sievers D, von Kiedrowski G (1994) Self-replication of complementary nucleotide-based oligomers. Nature 369:221–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand M, Prolla TA, Liskay RM, Petes TD (1993) Destabilization of tracts of simple repetitive DNA in yeast by mutations affecting DNA mismatch repair. Nature 365:274–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Streisinger G, Okada Y, Emrich J, Newton A, Tsugita E, Terzhaghi E, Inouye M (1966) Frameshift mutations and the genetic code. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 31:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautz D, Renz M (1984) Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 12:4127–4138

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautz D, Trick M, Dover GA (1986) Cryptic simplicity in DNA is a major source of genetic variation. Nature 322:652–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Treier M, Pfeifle C, Tautz D (1989) Comparison of the gap segmentation gene hunchback between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis reveals novel modes of evolutionary change. EMBO J 8:1517–1525

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle G (1993) TA-repeat microsatellites are closely associated with ARS consensus sequences in yeast chromosome III. Yeast 9:753–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R, 54 others (1994) 2.2 Mb of contiguous nucleotide sequence from chromosome III of C. elegans. Nature 368:32–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hancock, J.M. The contribution of slippage-like processes to genome evolution. J Mol Evol 41, 1038–1047 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173185

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173185

Key words

Navigation