Skip to main content
Log in

Real estate development as an option

  • II. Portfolio Theory and Contingent Claims Models in Real Estate
  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subject to legal limitations, the owner of undeveloped real estate can determine both the date and density at which to develop his property. Alternatively, he can abandon his property. The value of these options depends partly on the stochastic evolution through time of the operating revenues and construction costs of developed property. In this paper the option pricing problem is solved analytically and numerically for the optimal data and density of development, the optimal date of abandonment, and the resulting market values of the developed and undeveloped properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. “Property Taxes and the Timing of Urban Land Development.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 16 (1986), 483–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott, R. and Lewis, F. “The Transition of Land to Urban Use.” Journal of Political Economy 87 (1979), 161–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capozza, D. and Li, Y. “A Generalized Model of Land Conversion under Uncertainty.” Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, 1989.

  • Capozza, D. and G. Sick. “Risk and Return in Land Markets.” Mimeo, University of Michigan, 1989.

  • Clarke, H. and Reed, W. “A Stochastic Analysis of Land Development, Timing, and Property Valuation.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Victoria, 1987.

  • Findlay, M.C. and Howson, H. “Optimal Intertemporal Real Estate Ownership, Valuation, and Use.” American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal 3 (1975), 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S. “Call Option Pricing When the Exercise Price is Uncertain, and the Valuation of Bonds.” Journal of Finance 33 (1978), 169–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margrabe, W. “The Value of an Option to Exchange One Asset for Another.” Journal of Finance 33 (1978), 177–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. and Scheffman, D. “The Timing of Residential Land Development: A General Equilibrium Approach.” Journal of Urban Economics 5 (1978), 411–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. “The Rational Theory of Option Pricing.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science. 4 (1973), 141–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, D. “The Non-Neutrality of Land Value Taxation.” National Tax Journal 34 (1981), 125–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiryayev, A. Optimal Stopping Rules. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoup, D. “The Optimal Timing of Urban Land Development.” Regional Science Association Papers 25 (1970), 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stultz, R. “Options on the Minimum or the Maximum of Two Risky Assets: Analysis and Applications.” Journal of Financial Economics 10 (1982), 161–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titman, S. “Urban Land Prices under Uncertainty.” American Economic Review 75 (1975) 505–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, J.T. Real estate development as an option. J Real Estate Finan Econ 4, 191–208 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173124

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173124

Keywords

Navigation