Abstract
Among the crises facing our society is the public's loss of confidence in technical professionals and their ability to make decisions about large-scale projects (such as highways) in the public interest. To overcome this crisis of confidence, this paper hypothesizes a model for the role of the technical professional in the process of reaching decisions about public actions.
In evaluating technological projects with social consequences, one key issue is the differential incidence of impacts. Typically, some groups are hurt in order that others may benefit. Social equity must be considered explicitly. Such presently-used techniques as benefit-cost analysis and point-rating schemes are unsatisfactory. New techniques are needed, reflecting a more comprehensive model for the role of the technical team in the political process.
A normative model is outlined. First, the objective of the technical process is defined: to achieve substantial effective community agreement on a course of action which is feasible, equitable, and desirable. Second, a process for achieving this objective is proposed. A key element of this process is a four-phase strategy of technical and community interaction activities to achieve the objective. The basic premise of this approach is that the role of the technical team is to clarify the issues of choice, to assist the community in determining what is best for itself.
This theoretical model has resulted in several practical products. A procedural guide for use by highway and transportation agencies has been prepared, and a number of specific operational techniques have been developed and are included in the guide. The procedural guide is now being field-tested in several state highway departments. The theoretical model has already been useful in identifying, in one highway department, opportunities for significant changes in the agency's mission, organization and procedures to enable it to be more responsive to public concerns. The theoretical model also has served as the basis for the development of federal guidelines for consideration of social, economic and environmental factors in highway planning and decision-making, in all of the state highway departments in the U.S.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1968). Papers presented at a special conference on “Transportation and the Poor,” spring.
Automobile Manufacturer's Association (1969). Busway-Freeway Rapid Transit. Detroit: Automobile Manufacturer's Association, Inc., December.
Bishop, A., Bruce (1969). Socioeconomic and Community Factors in Planning Urban Freeways. Project on Engineering-Economic Planning, Stanford University Report EEP-33, Stanford, California, October.
Bleiker, Hans (1970). “Community Interaction Techniques.” Working draft, September.
Bleiker, Hans, Suhrbier, John H. and Manheim, Marvin, L. (1970). “Community Interaction as an Integral Part of the Highway Decision-Making Process.” Unpublished working paper, August.
Boyce, David, ed., Day, N. and McDonald, C. (1969). Metropolitan Plan Evaluation Methodology. Philadelphia: Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Pennsylvania.
Bridwell, Lowell K. (1969). “Freeways in the Urban Environment.” InJoint Development and Multiple use of Transportation Rights-of-way, Special Report 104. Washington, D.C.: Highway Research Board.
California (1969a). “Report of the Advisory Committee to the California Highway Commission and the Director of Public Works on Freeway Route Adoption and Design Procedures” (November 3).
California (1969b). “Division of Highways Circular Letter No. 69-123, Subject: Community and Environmental Factors in the Highway Planning Process” (October).
Colcord, Frank C., Jr. (1967). “Decision-Making and Transportation Policy: A Comparative Analysis.” Southwestern Social Science Quarterly 48:3 (December).
Federal Highway Administration (1968). The Freeway in the City.
Federal Highway Administration (1969a). A Book About Space.
Federal Highway Administration (1969b). Interim Policy and Procedure Memorandum 21-29, Subject: Joint Development of Highway Corridors and Multiple Use of Roadway Properties, (January 17).
Federal Highway Administration (1969c). Instructional Memorandum 21-2-69, 34–50, Subject: Federal Facilities on the Highway Right-of-Way, (January 17).
Federal Highway Administration (1972a). Policy and Procedure Memorandum. 90-4, Subject: Guidelines Relating to Economic, Social, and Environmental Effects of Highways, in press.
Federal Highway Administration (1972b). Guidelines Relating to Economic, Social, and Environmental Effects of Highway Projects. Report to Congress on Section 109 (h), Title 23, U.S.C. (1972).
Fellman, Gordon (1970). “Sociological Fieldwork is Essential in Studying Community Values.” In Socioeconomic Considerations in Transportation Planning. Highway Research Record 305. Washington, D.C.: Highway Research Board.
Highway Research Board (1969). Transportation and Community Values. Special Report 105. Washington, D.C.: Highway Research Board.
Hill, Stuart L. (1969). “Century Freeway (Watts).” InJoint Development and Multiple use of Transportation Rights-of-way. Special Report 104. Washington, D.C.: Highway Research Board.
Kochanowski, Robert and Wickstrom, George V. (1970). “On Improving the Transportation Planning Process.” In Transportation Analysis: Past and Prospects. Highway Research Record 309. Washington, D.C.: Highway Research Board.
Legarra, J. A., and Lammers, T. R. (1969). “The Highway Administrator Looks at Values.” In Transportation and Community Values. Special Report. Washington, D.C.: Highway Research Board.
Manheim, Marvin L., with Bhatt, Kiran U. and Ruiten, Earl R. (1968). Search and Choice in Transport Systems Planning Summary Report. Research Report R68–40. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Department of Civil Engineering, M.I.T., AD-693–071.
Manheim, Marvin L. (1969). “Search and Choice in Transport Systems Analysis.” Transportation Systems Planning, Highway Research Record No. 293. Washington, D.C.: Highway Research Board, pp. 54–81.
Manheim, Marvin L. et al. (1969). The Impacts of Highways Upon Environmental Values. Phase I Report for NCHRP Project 8–8. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Urban Systems Laboratory, M.I.T. (March).
Manheim, Marvin L., Suhrbier, John H. et al. (1971). Community Values in Highway Location and Design: A Procedural Guide. Urban Systems Laboratory Report 71–4. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. (September).
Martin, Brian V., Memmott, Frederick W. and Bone, A. J. (1963). Principles and Techniques for Forecasting Future Demand fur Urban Area Transportation Travel, Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1970). The Urban Transportation Planning Process: In Search of Improved Strategy. Report of a Panel of Experts, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, December. Also in Transportation Analysis: Past and Prospects. Highway Research Record 309. Washington, D.C.: Highway Research Board.
Riedesel, G. A. and Cook, John C. (1970). “Desirability Rating and Route Selection.” In Socioeconomic Considerations in Transportation Planning. Highway Research Record 305. Washington, D.C.: Highway Research Board.
Roberts, Paul O. (1970). “Model systems for urban transportation planning: Where do we go from here?” In Transportation Analysis: Past and Prospects. Highway Research Record 309. Washington, D.C.: Highway Research Board.
Turner, F. C. (1969). “Current Governmental Policies.” In Joint Development and Multiple Use of Transportation Rights-of-way. Washington, D.C.: Highway Research Board Special Report 104.
United States Code, Title 23, Section 109 (h).
Weber, Melvin N. and Angel, Schlomo, (1969). “The Social Context for Transport Policy.” Science and Technology and the Cities. Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This is a revised version of a paper presented to the Seventeenth North American Meeting, Regional Science Association, November 6–8, 1970.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manheim, M.L. Reaching decisions about technological projects with social consequences: A normative model. Transportation 2, 1–24 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172613
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172613