Skip to main content
Log in

Spacing of leks in relation to female home ranges, habitat requirements and male attractiveness in the great snipe (Gallinago media)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In an attempt to examine three main hypotheses on the evolution of leks, data on female home ranges, distance between leks and male site fidelity in the great snipe (Gallinago media) were obtained. In a 30 × 40 km area in central Sweden, the locations of 12 leks were identified. Six were within the study area (7 × 11 km) in which probably all leks were known. In the study area, nearest neighbor distances between leks were longer than the predicted drawing area (diameter of female home ranges plus the detection range of leks). Furthermore, in only 1 of 13 radio-tracked females did the estimated home range enclose many leks. These data do not fit the prediction from the hotspot hypothesis on the dispersion of leks, namely, that the distance between leks should be less than the drawing area and hence an average female home range should enclose more than one lek. The observed distance between leks was about the same as predicted by the female preference hypothesis. This hypothesis also predicts females visit mainly one lek; however, we found they sometimes visit two and nest close to a third. We propose that males may first settle according to hotspot rules, but females will resettle according to preferences for certain males and/or larger leks. In this way some hotspot leks are abandoned, and the distance between leks is increased as males become more tightly clumped. However, when all males and females have settled, the leks still existing would be on hotspots. In the female preference hypothesis, males are assumed to aggregate on leks because females prefer clustered males as they can be more easily compared than if they are dispersed. Alternatively, in the attractiveness hypothesis, it is suggested that females prefer certain males, and hence unattractive males surround the attractive are forced to join leks in order to come close to females. Our data on male site fidelity support the attractiveness hypothesis because successful and dominant males return to the same lek and territory, both within and between years, whereas unsuccessful males move to other leks. Attractiveness of certain males may explain why according to hotspot rules in this species males are more clumped than expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RD (1975) Natural selection and specialized chorusing behaviour in acoustical insects. In: Pimentel D (ed) Insects, science and society. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Arak A (1983) Male-male competition and mate choice in anuran amphibians. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 181–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Arak A (1984) Sneaky breeders. In: Barnard CJ (ed) Producers and scroungers. Croom Helm, London, pp 154–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery M, Sherwood G (1982) The lekking behaviour of Great snipe. Ornis Scand 13:72–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Beehler BM, Foster MS (1988) Hotshots, hotspots, and female preference in the organization of lek mating systems. Am Nat 131:203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW (1981) The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behaviour. Chiron Press, New York, pp 138–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Davies NB (1987) Relative roles of intra- and intersexual selection. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. John Wiley, Chichester, pp 143–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Gibson RM (1983) Leks and mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 109–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Gibson RM, Tsai IM (1986) Hotspots and the dispersion of leks. Anim Behav 34:1694–1709

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Gibson RM, McCarthy CE, Vehrencamp SL (1989) Dispersion of displaying male sage grouse. II. The role of female dispersion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1978) Ecological questions about territorial behaviour. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology an evolutionary approach (1st edn). Blackwell, Oxford, pp 317–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elveland J, Tjernberg M (1984) Vegetationsförhallånden på nå-gra spelplatser för dubbelbeckasin (Gallinago media) i västra Härjedalen och södra Lappland. (The vegetation on some display grounds of the great snipe, Gallinago media, in Sweden). Memo Soc Fauna Flora Fenn 60:125–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell SD, Lucas HL (1969) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor 19:16–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliard ET (1969) Birds of paradise and bowerbirds. Wiedenfeld and Nicholson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Glutz von Blotzheim UNG, Bauer KM, Bezzel E (1977) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Band 7. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling LM, Petrie M. Lekking in topi: a consequence of satellite behaviour by small males on hotspots. Anim Behav (in press)

  • Harvey MJ, Barbour RW (1965) Home range of Microtus ochrogaster as determined by a modified minimum area method. J Mammal 46:398–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J (1989) The cost of lek displays in the great snipe. In: Höglund J (ed) Sexual selection and the evolution of leks in the Great snipe (Gallinago media). Phd thesis, Uppsala University

  • Höglund J, Lundberg A (1987) Sexual selection in a monomorphic lek-breeding bird: correlates of male mating success in the great snipe Gallinago media. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:211–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J, Robertson JGM. Female preferences, male decision rules and the evolution of leks in the great snipe (Gallinago media). Anim Behav (in press)

  • Höglund J, Eriksson M, Lindell LE. Females, prefer males with white tails in the lekking great snipe. Anim Behav (in press)

  • Lemnell PA (1978) Social behaviour of the great snipe Capella media at the arena display. Ornis Scand 9:146–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Lill A (1976) Lek behaviour in the golden-headed manakin, Pipra erytrocephala, in Trinidad (West Indies). Z Tierpsychol Suppl 18:1–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne R, Payne K (1977) Social organization and mating success in local song populations of village indigo birds, Vidua chalybeata. Z Tierpsychol 45:113–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1987) The evolution of leks through female choice. Anim Behav 35:1424–1432

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafstedt T (1980) Vegetationskarta över de svenska fjällen. Kartblad 20 Funäsdalen. (Vegetation map of the Swedish mountain region. Map 20 Funäsdalen). Liber kartor, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge P, Larsen BB (1987) Spacing of adult and subadult male common capercaillie during the breeding season. Auk 104:481–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge P, Rolstad J (1986) Size and spacing of capercaillie leks in relation to social behaviour and habitat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:401–488

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: J. Höglund

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Höglund, J., Robertson, J.G.M. Spacing of leks in relation to female home ranges, habitat requirements and male attractiveness in the great snipe (Gallinago media). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26, 173–180 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172084

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172084

Keywords

Navigation