Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simulated in situ competitive ability and survival of a representative soil yeast, Cryptococcus albidus

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microcosms containing an air-dried autoclaved loamy sand (Eufala A) with low salt and organic content were inoculated with a representative (obligately aerobic, encapsulated) soil yeast, Cryptococcus albidus var. albidus T ATCC 10666, singly (for growth rate and survival determinations) and together with the bacterial biota native to Eufala A. The yeast competed successfully with the more rapidly growing bacteria in the presence of added water from 1% (5.7% of field capacity) to 14% (80% of field capacity) but grew for shorter times than when grown alone; times correlated with the lag phase of the bacterial biota. When well-watered (10 and 14%) competition cultures were allowed to dry and used as inoculum for subcultures, the yeast made significant growth only at 1% added water but survived at the higher moisture concentrations. The competitive ability of Cr. albidus confirms the previously reported advantages of the cryptococcal capsule in hydration and desiccation and, together with lengthy survival, suggests that the importance of such yeasts in the biogeochemistry of arid soils has been seriously underestimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aksenov SI, Babyeva IP, Golubev VI (1973) On the mechanism of adaptation of micro-organisms to conditions of extreme low humidity. In: Life Sciences and Space Research, vol. 11. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, pp 5–61

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander M (1977) Introduction to soil microbiology, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnett JA, Payne RW, Yarrow D (1990) Yeasts: characteristics and identification, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bunting LA, Neilson JB, Bulmer GS (1979) Cryptococcus neoformans: gastronomic delight of a soil ameba. Sabouraudia 17:225–232

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Leij FAAM, Whipps JM, Lynch JM (1994) The use of colony development for the characterization of bacterial communities in soil and on roots. Microb Ecol 27:81–97

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dietz A (1994) The lives and times of industrial actinomycetes. ASM News 60:366–369

    Google Scholar 

  7. di Menna ME (1959) Some physiological characters of yeasts from soils and allied habitats. J Gen Microbiol 20:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  8. do Carmo-Sousa L (1969) Distribution of yeasts in nature. In: Rose AH, Harrison JS (eds) The yeasts, 1st ed., vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 79–105

    Google Scholar 

  9. Golubev VI (1991) Capsules. In: Rose AH, Harrison JS (eds) The yeasts, 2nd ed., vol. 4, Academic Press, New York, pp 175–198

    Google Scholar 

  10. Golubev VI, Manukyan AR, Lazarev PI (1984) Functions of yeast capsule. (in Russian). Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii [J Gen Biol] 45:507–515

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goto-Yamamoto N, Sato S-I, Miki H, Park YK, Tadenuma M (1993) Taxonomic studies on yeast-lysing bacteria, and a new species Rarobacter incanus. J Gen Appl Microbiol 39:261–272

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hagler AN, Ahearn DG (1981) Rapid diazonium blue B test to detect basidiomycetous yeasts. Int J Syst Bacteriol 31:204–208

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jimenez M, Gonzalez AE, Martinez ML, Martinez AT, Dale BE (1991) Screening of yeasts isolated from decayed wood for lignocellulose-degrading enzyme activities. Mycol Res 95:1299–1302

    Google Scholar 

  14. Labeda DP (1993) The culture collection network. United States Federation for Culture Collections Newsletter 23(3):4

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lund A (1954) Studies on the ecology of yeasts. Munksgaard, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  16. Middelhoven WJ (1993) Catabolism of benzene compounds by ascomycetous and basidiomycetous yeasts and yeastlike fungi. Anton v Leeuw 63:125–144

    Google Scholar 

  17. Middelhoven WJ, Koorevaar M, Schuur GW (1992) Degradation of benzene compounds by yeasts in acidic soils. Plant Soil 145:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mörsen A, Rehm H-J (1990) Degradation of phenol by a defined mixed culture immobilized by adsorption on activated carbon and sintered glass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33:206–212

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.Nicholas WL (1984) The biology of free-living nematodes. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nikitin DI (1973) Direct electron microscopic techniques for the observation of microorganisms in soil. Bull Ecol Res Commun (Stockholm) 17:85–92

    Google Scholar 

  21. Phaff HJ, Starmer WT (1987) Yeasts associated with plants, insects and soil. In: Rose AH, Harrison JS (eds) The yeasts, 2nd ed., vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, pp 123–180

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reichenbach H, Dworkin M (1981) The order Myxobacterales. In: Starr MP, Stolp H, Trüper HG, Balows A, Schlegel HG (eds) The prokaryotes, 1st ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p 332

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roberson EB, Firestone MK (1992) Relationship between desiccation and exopolysaccharide production in a soil Pseudomonas sp. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1284–1291

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sampaio JP, van Uden N (1991) Rhodotorula ferulica sp. nov., a yeast that degrades ferulic acid and other phenolic compounds. System Appl Microbiol 14:146–149

    Google Scholar 

  25. Servili M, Begliomini AL, Montedoro G, Petruccioli M, Federici F (1992) Utilisation of a yeast pectinase in olive oil extraction and red wine making processes. J Sci Food Agric 58:253–260

    Google Scholar 

  26. Staib F (1963) Zur Widerstandsfähigkeit von Cryptococcus neoformans gegen Austrocknung und hohe Temperaturen. Arch Mikrobiol 44:323–333

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vishniac HS, Klingler J (1986) Yeasts in the Antarctic desert. In: Megusar F, Gantar M (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium of Microbial Ecology, Slovene Society for Microbiology, Llubjana, Serbia, pp 46–51

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vishniac HS, Kurtzman CP (1992) Cryptococcus antarcticus sp. nov. and Cryptococcus albidosimilis sp. nov., basidioblastomycetes from Antarctic soils. Int J System Bacteriol 42:547–553

    Google Scholar 

  29. Williams ST, Goodfellow M, Alderson G (1989) Genus Streptomyces Waksman and Henrici (1943), 339AL. In: Williams ST, Sharpe ME, Holt JG (eds) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 4, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 2452–2492

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wynn-Williams DD (1982) Simulation of seasonal changes in microbial activity of maritime Antarctic peat. Soil Biol Biochem 14:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yamanaka S, Kanbe S, Fudo R (1993) Lysis of basidiomycetous yeast, Rhodotorula glutinis caused by myxobacteria. J Gen Appl Microbiol 39:419–427

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yeates GW (1971) Feeding types and feeding groups in plant and soil nematodes. Pedobiologia 11:173–179

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Oklahoma State University, 74048, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA

    H. S. Vishniac

Authors
  1. H. S. Vishniac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vishniac, H.S. Simulated in situ competitive ability and survival of a representative soil yeast, Cryptococcus albidus . Microb Ecol 30, 309–320 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171937

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171937

Keywords

Search

Navigation