Skip to main content
Log in

The various faces of scientific productivity: a contingency analysis

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We argue that the meaning of “scientific productivity” takes on various forms under different conditions. The methodology offered in this paper demonstrates that fluctuations in reliability coefficients (and possibly the validity of the construct) are associated with work context (academic vs. non-academic), individual attributes (young vs. veteran researchers), professional affiliation (scientists vs. engineers) and research characteristics (theoretical vs. experimental, externally vs. internally funded research). These results are of critical importance for the evaluation of scientific work, especially since they imply the existence of contexts in which several productivity indicators are invalid. The conceptual and the methodological implications of the results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shenhav, Y.A., Haberfeld, Y. The various faces of scientific productivity: a contingency analysis. Qual Quant 22, 365–380 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171627

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171627

Keywords

Navigation