Abstract
Previously we reported that there are subfamily differences in drone production in queenless honey bee colonies, but these biases are not always explained by subfamily differences in oviposition behavior. Here we determine whether these puzzling results are best explained by either inadequate sampling of the laying worker population or reproductive conflict among workers resulting in differential treatment of eggs and larvae. Using colonies composed of workers from electrophoretically distinct subfamilies, we collected samples of adult bees engaged in the following behavior: “true” egg laying, “false” egg laying, indeterminate egg laying, egg cannibalism, or nursing (contact with larvae). We also collected samples of drone brood at four different ages: 0 to 2.5-h-old eggs, 0 to 24-h-old eggs, 3 to 8-day-old larvae, and 9 to 14-day-old larvae and pupae. Allozyme analyses revealed significant subfamily differences in the likelihood of exhibiting egg laying, egg cannibalism, and nursing behavior, as well as significant subfamily differences in drone production. There were no subfamily differences among the different types of laying workers collected from each colony, suggesting that discrepancies between subfamily biases in egg-laying behavior and drone production are not due to inadequate sampling of the laying worker population. Subfamily biases in drone brood production within a colony changed significantly with brood age. Laying workers had significantly more developed ovaries than either egg cannibals or nurses, establishing a physiological correlate for the observed behavioral genetic differences. These results suggest there is reproductive conflict among subfamilies and individuals within queenless colonies of honey bees. The implications of these results for the evolution of reproductive conflict, in both queenright and queenless contexts, are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams J, Rothman ED, Kerr WE, Paulino ZL (1977) Estimation of the number of sex alleles and queen matings from diploid male frequencies in a population of Apis mellifera. Genetics 86:583–596
Bailey L, Ball BV (1991) Honey bee pathology. Academic Press, London
Breed MD, Butler L, Stiller T (1985) Kin recognition by worker honey bees in genetically mixed groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:3058–3061
Campbell DT (1983) The two distinct routes beyond kin selection to ultrasociality: implications for the humanities and social sciences. In: Bridgeman D (ed) The nature of prosocial development: theories and strategies. Academic Press, New York, pp 11–41
Carlin NF, Frumhoff PC (1990) Nepotism in the honey bee. Nature 346:706–707
Coelho JR, Mitton JB (1988) Oxygen consumption duing hovering is associated with genetic variation of enzymes in honey bees. Funct Ecol 2:141–146
Contel EPB, Mestriner MA, Martins E (1977) Genetic control and developmental expression of malate dehydrogenase in Apis mellifera. Biochem Genet 15:859–876
Delaplane KS, Harbo JR (1987) Drone production by young versus old worker honeybees in queenless colonies. Apidologie 18:115–120
Engels W Imperatriz-Fonseca VL (1990) Caste development, reproductive strategies, and control of fertility in honey bees and stingless bees. In: Engels W (ed) Social insects. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 167–230
Evers CA, Seeley TD (1986) Kin discrimination and aggression in honey bee colonies with laying workers. Anim Behav 34:924–944
Free JB, Williams IH (1974) Factors determining food storage and brood rearing in honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) comb. J Entomol A 49:47–63
Frumhoff PC, Schneider S (1987) The social consequences of honey bee polyandry: the effects of kinship on worker interactions within colonies. Anim Behav 35:255–262
Getz WM, Smith KB (1983) Genetic kin recognition: honey bees discriminate between full and half sisters. Nature 302:147–148
Hamilton WD (1964a) The genetical theory of social behavior I. J Theor Biol 7:1–16
Hamilton WD (1964b) The genetical theory of social behavior II. J Theor Biol 7:17–52
Hebert PDN, Beaton MJ (1989) Practical handbook of cellulose acetate gel electophoresis. Helena Labs, Beaumont, Texas
Lindauer M (1953) Division of labor in the honeybee colony. Bee World 34:63–73, 85–90
Mackensen O, Tucker KW (1970) Instrumental insemination of queen bees (Agricultural Handbook No. 390) US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Moritz RFA, Hillesheim E (1985) Inheritance of dominance in honeybees (Apis mellifera capensis Esch.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:87–89
Moritz RFA, Southwick EE (1992) Bees as superorganisms: an evolutionary reality. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Noonan KC (1986) Recognition of queen larvae by worker honey bees (Apis mellifera). Ethology 73:295–306
Noonan KC, Kolmes SA (1989) Kin recognition of worker brood by worker honey bees, Apis mellifera L. J Insect Behav 4:473–485
Oldroyd BP, Rinderer TE, Buco SM (1990) Nepotism in the honey bee. Nature 346:707–708
Page RE (1986) Sperm utilization in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 31:297–320
Page RE, Erickson EH (1984) Selective rearing of queens by worker honey bees: kin or nestmate recognition. Ann Entomol Soc Am 77:578–580
Page RE, Erickson EH (1988) Reproduction by worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:117–126
Page RE, Laidlaw HH (1988) Full sisters and super sisters: a terminological paradigm. Anim Behav 36:944–945
Page RE, Metcalf RA (1984) A population investment sex ratio for the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) Am Nat 124:680–702
Page RE, Robinson GE (1990) Nepotism in the honey bee. Nature 346:708
Page RE, Robinson GE, Fondrk MK (1989) Genetic specialists, kin recognition, and nepotism in honey-bee colonies. Nature 338:576–579
Page RE, Breed MD, Getz WM (1990) Nepotism in the honey bee. Nature 346:707
Pamilo P, Crozier RH (1982) Measuring genetic relatedness in natural populations: methodology. Theor Popul Biol 21:171–193
Plettner E, Slessor KN, Winston ML, Robinson GE, Page RE (1993) Mandibular gland components and ovarian development as measures of caste differentiation in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). J Insect Physiol 39:235–240
Ratnieks FLW (1988) Reproductive harmony via mutual policing by workers in eusocial Hymenoptera. Am Nat 132:217–236
Ratnieks FLW (1993) Egg laying, egg removal and ovary development by workers in queenright honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:191–198
Ratnieks FLW, Visscher PK (1989) Worker policing in the honeybee. Nature 342:796–797
Robinson GE, Page RE (1988) Genetic determination of guarding and undertaking in honey-bee colonies. Nature 333:356–358
Robinson GE, Page RE, Strambi A, Strambi C (1989) Hormonal and genetic control of behavioral integration in honey bee colonies. Science 246:109–112
Robinson GE, Page RE, Fondrk MK (1990) Intracolonial behavioral variation in worker oviposition, oophagy, and larval care in queenless honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:315–323
Ruttner F, Hesse B (1981) Rassenspezifische Unterschiede in Ovarentwicklung und Eiblage von weisellosen Arbeiterinnen der Honigbiene Apis mellifera L. Apidologie 12:159–183
Sakagami SF (1954) Occurrence of an aggressive behavior in queenless hives, with considerations on the social organization of honeybees. Insectes Soc 1:221–343
Sakagami SF (1958) The false queen: fourth adjustive response in dequeened honeybee colonies. Behaviour 13:280–295
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman,San Francisco
Velthuis HHW (1970) Ovarian Development in Apis mellifera worker bees. Entomol Exp Appl 13:377–394
Velthuis HHW (1985) The honeybee queen and the social organization of her colony. In: Holldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Sinauer, Sunderland
Visscher PK (1986) Kinship discrimination in queen rearing by honey bees (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:453–460
Visscher PK (1989) A quantitative study of worker reproduction in honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:247–254
Visscher PK (1990) Kin recognition and nepotism in Apis mellifera. In: Veeresh GK, Mallik B, Viraktamath CA (eds) Social insects and the environment. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, pp 139–140
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by R.F.A. Moritz
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Page, R.E., Robinson, G.E. Reproductive competition in queenless honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35, 99–107 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171499
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171499