Skip to main content
Log in

The flare phenomenon: far from fair and square

  • Editorial
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Mundy GR. The hypercalcemia of malignancy. Kidney Int 1987;31:142–155.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mundy GR. Hypercalcemia of malignancy revisited. J Clin Invest 1988;82:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coleman RE, Rubens RD. Bone metastases and breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 1985;12:251–270.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gillespie PJ, Alexander JL, Edelstyn GA. Changes in 87mSr concentrations in skeletal metastases in patients responding to cyclical combination chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. J Nuct Med 1975;16:191–193.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander JL, Gillespie PJ, Edelstyn GA. Serial bone scanning using technetium 99m diphosphonate in patients undergoing cyclical combination chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. Clin Nucl Med 1976;1:13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Greenberg EJ, Chu FCH, Dwyer AJ, Ziminski EM, Dimich AB, Laughlin JS. Effects of radiation therapy on bone lesions as measured by 47Ca and 85Sr local kinetics. J Nucl Med 1972;13:747–751.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McNeil BJ. Value of bone scanning in neoplastic disease. Semin Nucl Med 1984;14:277–286.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rossleigh MA, Lovegrove FTA, Reynolds PM, Byrne MJ. Serial bone scans in the assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med 1982;7:397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rossleigh MA, Lovegrove FTA, Reynolds PM, Byrne MJ, Whitney BP. The assessment of response to therapy of bone metastases in breast cancer. Aust NZ J Med 1984;14:19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coleman RE, Mashiter G, Whitaker KB, Moss DW Rubens RD, Fogelman I. Bone scan flare predicts successful systemic therapy for bone metastases. J Nucl Med 1988;29:1354–1359.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coleman RE, Mashiter G, Fogelman I, Whitaker KD, Caleffi M, Moss DW Rubens RD. Osteocalcin: a potential marker of marker of metastatic bone disease and response to treatment. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1988;24:1211–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Coleman RE, Whitaker KB, Moss DW Mashiter G, Fogelman I, Rubens RD. Biochemical prediction of response of bone metastases to treatment. Br J Cancer 1988;58:205–210.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pollen JJ, Shlaer WJ. Osteoblastic response to successful treatment of metastatic cancer of the prostate. Am J Radiol 1979;132:927–931.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pollen JJ, Witztum KF, Ashburn WL. The flare phenomenon on radionuclide bone scan in metastatic prostate cancer. Am J Radiol 1984;142:773–776.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sundkvist GMG, Ahlgren L, Lilja B, Mattsson S, Abrahamsson PA, Wadström LB. Repeated quantitative bone scintigraphy in patients with prostatic carcinoma treated with orchiectomy. Eur J Nucl Med 1988;14:203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sundkvist GMG, Ahlgren L, Lilja B, Mattsson S, Abrahamsson PA. Dynamic quantitative bone scintigraphy in patients with prostatic carcinoma treated by orchiectomy. Eur J Nucl Med 1990;16:671–676.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cosolo W Morstyn G, Arkles, B Zimet AS, Zalcberg JR. Flare responses in small cell carcinoma of the lung. Clin Nucl Med 1988;13:13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bitran JD, Bekerman C, Desser RK. The predictive value of serial bone scans in assessing response to chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. Cancer 1980;45:1562–1568.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hortobagyi GN, Libshitz HI, Seabold JE. Osseous metastases of breast cancer. Clinical, biochemical, radiographic and scintigraphic evaluation of response to therapy. Cancer 1984;53:577–582.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Citrin DL, Hougen C, Zweibel W, Schlise S, Pruitt B, Ershler W Davis TE, Harberg J, Cohen AI. The use of serial bone scans in assessing response of bone metastases to systemic treatment. Cancer 1981;47:680–685.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Coombes RC, Dady P, Parsons C, McCready VR, Ford HT, Gazet JC, Powles TL. Assessment of response of bone metastases to systemic treatment in patients with breast cancer. Cancer 1983;52:610–614.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Levenson RM, Sauerbrunn BJL, Bates HR, Newman RD, Eddy JL, Ihde DC. Comparative value of bone scintigraphy and radiography in monitoring tumor response in systemically treated prostatic carcinoma. Radiology 1983;146:513–518.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Johns WD, Garnick MB, Kaplan WD. Leuprolide therapy for prostate cancer. An association with scintigraphic “flare” on bone scan. Clin Nucl Med 1990;15:485–487.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: WD. van Schelven

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Schelven, W., Pauwels, E. The flare phenomenon: far from fair and square. Eur J Nucl Med 21, 377–380 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171410

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171410

Navigation