Abstract
Codon usage patterns and phylogenetic relationships in the actin multigene family have been analyzed for three dipteran species—Drosophila melanogaster, Bactrocera dorsalis, and Ceratitis capitata. In certain phylogenetic tree reconstructions, using synonymous distances, some gene relationships are altered due to a homogenization phenomenon. We present evidence to show that this homogenization phenomenon is due to codon usage bias. A survey of the pattern of synonymous codon preferences for I I actin genes from these three species reveals that five out of the six Drosophila actin genes show high degrees of codon bias as indicated by scaled Ξ2 values. In contrast to this, four out of the five actin genes from the other species have low codon bias values. A Monte Carlo contingency test indicates that for those Drosophila actin genes which exhibit codon bias, the patterns of codon usage are different compared to actin genes from the other species. In addition, the genes exhibiting codon bias also appear to have reduced rates of synonymous substitution. The homogenization phenomenon seen in terms of synonymous substitutions is not observed for nonsynonymous changes. Because of this homogenization phenomenon, “trees” constructed based on synonymous substitutions will be affected. These effects can be overt in the case of multigene families, but similar distortions may underlie reconstructions based on single-copy genes which exhibit codon usage bias.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aota SI, Ikemura T (1986) Diversity in G + C content at the third position of codons in vertebrate genes and its cause. Nucleic Acids Res 14:6345–6355
Arnheim N (1983) Concerted evolution of multigene families. In: Nei M, Koehn RK (eds) Evolution of genes and proteins. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 38–61
Cleveland DW, Lopata MA, MacDonald RJ, Cowan NJ, Rutter WJ, Kirschner MW (1980) Number and evolutionary conservation of α- and β-mbulin and cytoplasmic β- and γ-actin genes using specific cloned cDNA probes. Cell 20:95–105
Crupples GC, Pearlman RE (1986) Isolation and characterization of the actin gene from Tetrahymena thermophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:5160–5164
Dibb NJ, Newman AJ (1989) Evidence that introns arose at protosplice sites. EMBO J 8:2015–2021
Dover GA (1982) Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolution. Nature 299:111–217
Dover GA, Tautz D (1986) Conservation and divergence in multigene families: alternatives to selection and drift. Philos Trans R Soe Lond Biol 312:275–289
Dudler R (1990) The single-copy actin gene of Phytophthora megasperma encodes a protein considerably diverged from any other known actin. Plant Mol Biol 14:415–422
Engel JN, Gunning PW, Kedes L (1981) Isolation and characterization of human actin genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:4674–4678
Fidel S, Doonan JH, Morris NR (1988) Aspergillus nidulans contains a single actin gene which has unique intron locations and encodes an actin. Gene 70:283–293
Fyrberg EA, Mahaffey JW, Bond BJ, Davidson N (1983) Transcripts of the six Drosophila actin genes accumulate in a stage- and tissue-specific manner. Cell 33:115–123
Gallwitz D, Seidel I (1980) Structure of a split yeast gene: complete nucleotide sequence of the actin gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Nail Acad Sci USA 77:2546–2550
Gojobori T, Moriyama EN, Kimura M (1990) Statistical methods for estimation sequence divergence. In: Doolittle RF (ed) Methods in enzymology, vol 183. Molecular evolution: computer analysis of protein and nucleic acid sequence. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 531–550
Grantham R, Gautier C, Gouy M, Mercier R, Pave A (1980) Codon usage catalog and the genome hypothesis. Nucleic Acids Res 8:r49-r62
He M, Haymer DS (1991) Isolation and characterization of actin homologous sequences from Dacus dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 84:601–607
He M, Haymer DS (1992) A muscle-specific actin gene from the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Insect Mol Biol 1:15–24
He M, Haymer DS (1994) The actin gene family in the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis. 1. Muscle specific actins. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 24:891–906
Hood L, Campbell JH, Elgin SCR (1975) The organization, expression and evolution of antibody genes and other multigene families. Annu Rev Genet 9:305–353
Ikemura T (1981) Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli: transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optional for the E. coli translational system. J Mol Biol 151:389–409
Ikemura T (1982) Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs. J Mol Biol 158:573–597
Jefferys A (1979) DNA sequence variants in Gγ-, Aγ-, δ- and β-globin genes of man. Cell 18:1–10
Kim K, Gooze L, Petersen C, Gut J, Nelson RG (1992) Isolation, sequence and molecular karyotype analysis of the actin gene of Cryptosposidium parvum. Mol Biochem Parasitol 50:105–114
Kindle KN, Firtel RA (1978) Identification and analysis or Dictyosteluim actin genes, a family of moderately repeated genes. Cell 15:763–778
Lewin B (1990) Genes IV. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lewontin RC, Felsenstein J (1965) The robustness of homogeneity tests in 2 × N tables. Biometrics 21:19–33
Li W-H, Graur D (1991) Fundamentals of molecular evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
Li W-H, Wu C-I, Luo C-C (1985) A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Mol Biol Evol 25:330–342
Loukas M, Kafatos FC (1986) The actin loci in the genus Drosophila: establishment of chromosomal homologies among distantly related species by in situ hybridization Chromosoma 94:297–308
Maeda N, Smithies O (1986) The evolution of multigene families: human haptoglobin genes. Amin Rev Genet 20:81–108
MoriyamaEN, Gojoboro T (1992) Rates of synonymous substitution and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila. Genetics 130:855–864
Mounier N, Gouy M, Mouchiroud D, Prudhomme C (1992) Insect muscle actins differ distinctly from invertebrate and vertebrate cytoplasmic actins. J Mol Evol 34:406–415
Ng R, Abelson J (1980) Isolation and sequence of the gene for actin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. oc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:3912–3916
Ohno S (1970) Evolution by gene duplication. Springer-Verlag, New York
Ohta T (1982) Some evolutionary problems of multigene families considered from the standpoint of population genetics. In: Kimura M (ed) Molecular evolution, protein polymorphism and the neutral theory. Japan Scientific Press, Tokyo, pp 59–77
Post LE, Strycharz GD, Nomura H, Lewis H, Dennis PP (1979) Nucleotide sequence of the ribosomal protein gene cluster adjacent to the gene for RNA polymerase subunit β in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:1697–1701
Saccone C, Lanave C, Pesole G, Preparata G (1990) Influence of base composition on quantitative estimates of gene evolution. In: Doolittle RF (ed) Methods in enzymology, vol 183. Molecular evolution: computer analysis of protein and nucleic acid sequence. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 570–583
Saito N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425
Sawyer S (1989) Statistical tests for detecting gene conversion. Mol Biol Evol 6:526–538
Scott AL, Heath P, Trusko S, Boyer SH, Press W, Goodmn M, Czelusniak J, Chang L-YE, Slightom L (1984) The sequence of the gorilla fetal globin genes: Evidence for multiple gene conversions in human evolution. Mol Biol Evol 1:371–389
Sharp PM, Li W-H (1986) An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J Mol Evol 24:28–38
Sharp PM, Li W-H (1989) On the rate of DNA sequence evolution in Drosophila. J Mol Evol 28:398–402
Shields DC, Sharp PM, Higgins DG, Wright F (1988) “Silent” sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. Mol Biol Evol 5:704–716.
Swofford DL (1990) Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.0, computer program. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign
Swofford DL, Olsen GJ (1990) Phylogeny reconstruction. In: Hillis DS, Moritz C (eds) Molecular systematics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 411–501
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Correspondence to: M. He
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
He, M., Haymer, D.S. Codon bias in actin multigene families and effects on the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships. J Mol Evol 41, 141–149 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170665
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170665