Skip to main content
Log in

Population density and the intensity of sexual selection on body length in spatially or temporally restricted natural populations of a seed bug

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Population density affects the dynamics of mate acquisition and the opportunity for sexual selection in natural populations of the seed bug, Neacoryphus bicrucis Say (Hemiptera : Lygaeidae). The opportunity for sexual selection and the intensity of directional sexual selection on body length increased as the population density declined within a season for a population in a small, disjunct patch of host plant, Senecio anonymus. In a larger, dispersed population, both measures of selection were greater in host plant patches of low rather than high adult density when the population was sampled at peak density. Under conditions of higher density, males were more likely to share plants, larger males were less likely to monopolize patches of host plant to which females were attracted for mating, and smaller males were more likely to mate in the presence of large males. Thus, resource defense polygyny collapsed under high density, obviating the advantage of size in territory control, and resulted in scramble competition among males for mates. The population exhibited significant additive genetic variation for body length. This suggests that natural selection acting on other components of fitness favors smaller size or that the direction of sexual selection on size fluctuates between generations in response to the between-year variation in population density. Thus, strong sexual selection appears to impose a significant genetic load.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock J (1979) The evolution of intraspecific diversity in male reproductive strategies in some bees and wasps. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 381–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SJ, Wade MJ (1984) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton NH, Turelli M (1989) Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? Annu Rev Genet 23:337–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman AG (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson P (ed) (1983) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgia G (1979) Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 19–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown D (1988) Components of lifetime reproductive success. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 439–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade WH (1979) Evolution of alternative male reproductive strategies in field crickets. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 343–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade WH (1984) Genetic variation underlying sexual behavior and reproduction. Am Zool 24:355–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B (1984) The evolutionary genetics of life histories. In: Shorrocks B (ed) Evolutionary ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 117–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1988) Introduction. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner J (1989) Density-dependent sexual selection in the fungus beetle, Bolitotherus cornutus. Evolution 43:1378–1386

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Gong G (1983) A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jacknife, and cross validation. Am Stat 37:36–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • French BW, Cade WH (1989) Sexual selection at varying population densities in male field crickets, Gryllus veletis and Gryllus pennsylvanicus. J Insect Behav 2:105–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1987) Measuring sexual selection: why bother? In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. John Wiley, New York, pp 221–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant BR, Grant PR (1989) Natural selection on Darwin's finches. Am Nat 133:377–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (1984) Sexual selection and sexual differences in Mormon crickets (Orthoptera:Tettigoniidae, Anabrus simplex). Evolution 38:1011–1022

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick AV (1988) Female choice and the heritability of attractive male traits: an empirical study. Am Nat 132:267–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP, Johnson LK (1987) Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice, and sexual selection. Am Nat 130:91–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LK (1982) Sexual selection in a brentid weevil. Evolution 36:251–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1980a) Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1980b) Genetic variation and phenotypic evolution during allopatric speciation. Am Nat 116:463–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210–1226

    Google Scholar 

  • Low BS (1978) Environmental uncertainty and the parental strategies of marsupials and placentals. Am Nat 112:319–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1985) Sexual selection, handicaps and true fitness. J Theor Biol 115:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Brown LRW (1986) Competition and body size. Theor Pop Biol 30:166–180

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley DE (1981) Application of the Kence-Bryant model of mating behavior to a natural population of soldier beetles. Am Nat 117:400–402

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley DE (1983) An estimate of the relative opportunities for natural and sexual selection in a population of milkweed beetles. Evolution 37:701–707

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley DE, Wade MJ (1978) Female choice and the mating structure of a natural population of the soldier beetle, Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus. Evolution32:771–775

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK (1981a) Interspecific interference competition and mate choice in the soldier beetle, Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:65–66

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK (1981b) Resource partitioning by three species of hemipteran herbivores on the basis of host plant density. Oecologia 48:414–417

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK (1982) Density dependent sexual selection and positive phenotypic assortative mating in natural populations of the soldier beetle, Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus. Evolution 36:1227–1235

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK (1984a) Host plant morphology, speciation, and the economics of mate choice in the soldier beetle, Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus. Evol Theory 7:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK (1984b) Host plant density and territorial behavior of the seed bug, Neacoryphus bicrucis (Hemiptera:Lygaeidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14:181–187

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK (1986a) Null models and the “intensity” of sexual selection. Evol Theory 8:49–51

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK (1986b) Resource patchiness and the intensity of sexual selection in a resource defending polygynous insect species. Oikos 47:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK (1987) Heritability of size, a sexually selected character, and the response to sexual selection in a natural population of the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Heredity 59:391–395

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK (1989) Prolonged copulation as a post-insemination guarding tactic in a natural population of the ragwort seed bug. Anim Behav 38:659–664

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK (1991a) Components of variance in male lifetime copulatory and reproductive success in a seed bug. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:121–126

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK (1991b) The r-K continuum and the relative effectiveness of sexual selection. Oikos 60:263–265

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK, Boromisa RD (1987) Male choice, fighting ability, assortative mating and the intensity of sexual selection in the milkweed longhorn beetle, Tetraopes tetraophthalmus (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:239–246

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK, Shure DJ (1987) Pseudocompetition: interspecific displacement of insect species through misdirected courtship. Oikos 49:291–298

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK, Shure DJ (1990) Spatial and temporal density dependence of host plant patch use by the seed bug, Neacoryphus bicrucis (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). Oikos 58:306–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L, Halliday T (1984) Mating patterns and mate choice. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 222–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Price GR (1970) Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Price TD (1984) Sexual selection on body size, territory and plumage variables in a population of Darwin's finches. Evolution 38:327–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Seger J (1985) Unifying genetic models for the evolution of female choice. Evolution 39:1185–1193

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Bailey JW (1990) Resource influenced sex roles of zaprochiline tettigoniids (Orthoptera:Tettigoniidae). Evolution 44:1853–1868

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M (1987) Quantitative genetics of heterochrony. Evolution 41:799–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Solbreck C (1978) Migration, diapause, and direct development as alternative life histories in the seed bug, Neacoryphus bicrucis. In: Dingle H (ed) Evolution of insect migration and diapause. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 196–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE (1978) Ecological methods. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (1987) Random and deterministic components of variance in mating success. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. John Wiley, New York, pp 209–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) Evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine Press, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1985) Social evolution. Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Turelli M (1984) Heritable genetic variation via mutation selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor Pop Biol 25:138–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ (1987) Measuring sexual selection. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. John Wiley, New York, pp 197–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ, Arnold SJ (1980) The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behaviour, female choice, and sperm precedence. Anim Behav 28:446–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L (1987) Systat: the system for statistics. Systat Inc, Evanston

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS, Hedrick AV (1982) Speciation and the economics of mate choice. Evol Theory 6:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLain, D.K. Population density and the intensity of sexual selection on body length in spatially or temporally restricted natural populations of a seed bug. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30, 347–356 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170602

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170602

Keywords

Navigation