Skip to main content
Log in

Protein content of spermatophores in relation to monandry/polyandry in butterflies

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolution of a mating system, and specifically mating frequency, is dependent on the costs and benefits to both sexes of mating once or several times. In butterflies, males transfer a spermatophore that contains both sperm and accessory gland products. Accessory gland substances contain nutrients which, in some species, females use to increase their reproductive output and longevity. Nutrients contained in these packaged ejaculates represent investment by males in reproduction. Consequently, the nutritional composition of spermatophores may vary depending on the mating system. There are two lines of arguments concerning the evolution of the nutrient content of ejaculates. One hypothesis argues that male nuptial gifts evolved in the context of certainty of paternity and ease of finding mates; thus spermatophores of polyandrous males (with lower certainty of paternity and greater ease of finding mates) should contain less protein than those of monandrous males, since more spermatophores are produced on average. The other hypothesis argues that polyandry evolved in the context of maximization of male transfer of nutrients to females, and hence spermatophores of polyandrous males should contain more protein than those of monandrous males. In an attempt to distinguish between these two hypotheses, we determined how protein content of ejaculates varied with the degree of polyandry in nine species of pierid and two species of satyrid butterflies. We found that both relative ejaculate mass and protein content increased with the degree of polyandry. Hence our results are consistent with the view that polyandry has evolved in the context of male transfer of nutrients to females, and provides another example of a male adaptation to multiple mating in butterflies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker HG, Baker I (1973) Amino acids in nectar and their evolutionary significance. Nature 241:543–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs CL (1981) Selection pressure affecting male nutrient investment at mating in heliconiine butterflies. Evolution 35:931–940

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs CL (1990) A general model of the role of male-donated nutrients in female insects' reproduction. Am Nat 136:598–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs CL, Gilbert LE (1979) Male contribution to egg production in butterflies: Evidence for transfer of nutrients at mating. Science 206:83–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs CL, Watt WW (1981) Population structure of pierid butterflies. I. Genetic and physiological investment in offspring by male Colias. Oecologia 50:320–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond BA III (1984) Multiple mating and sperm competition in the Lepidoptera. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic, New York, pp 291–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage MJG, Cook PA (1994) Sperm size or numbers? Effectsof nutritional stress upon eupyrene and apyrene sperm production strategies in the moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Funct Ecol 8:594–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland T Jr, Dickerman AW, Janis CM, Jones JA (1993) Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulations. Syst Biol 42:265–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger HJ (1981) Enzyme electrophoresis studies of the genetic relationship of pierid butterflies. I. European taxa. J Res Lepid 19:181–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert LE (1972) Pollen feeding and reproductive biology of Heliconious butterflies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69: 1403–1407

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert LE (1976) Postmating female odor in Heliconius butterflies: A male-contributed antiaphrodisiac? Science 193:419–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield MD (1982) The question of paternal investment in Lepidoptera: male-contributed proteins in Plodia interpunctella. Int J Invert Reproduc 5:323–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Gywnne D (1984) Male mating effort, confidence of paternity, and insect sperm competition. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic, New York, pp 117–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala A, Wiklund C (1994) Polyandrous female butterflies forage for matings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:385–388

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala A, Wiklund C (1995) Female mate choice and mating costs in the polyandrous butterfly Pieris napi. J Insect Behav 8:355–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson B (1995) Resource allocation and mating systems in butterflies. Evolution (in press)

  • Labine PA (1964) Population biology of the butterfly Euphydryas editha. I. Barriers to multiple inseminations. Evolution 18:335–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Leimar O, Karlsson B, Wiklund C (1994) Unpredictable food and sexual size dimorphism in insects. Proc R Soc Lond B 258: 121–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall LD (1982) Male nutrient investment in the Lepidoptera: what nutrients should males invest? Am Nat 120:273–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall LD (1985) Protein and lipid composition of Colias philodice and C. eurytheme spermatophores and their changes over time (Pieridae). J Res Lepid 24:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Obara Y, Tateda H, Kuwabara M (1975) Mating behaviour of the cabbage white butterfly, Pieris rapae crucivora. V. Copulatory stimuli inducing changes of female response patterns. Zool Mag 84:71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberhauser KS (1988) Male monarch butterfly spermatophore mass and mating strategies. Anim Behav 36:1384–1388

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberhauser KS (1989) Effects of spermatophores on male and female monarch butterfly reproductive success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:237–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberhauser KS (1992) Rate of ejaculate breakdown and intermating intervals in monarch butterflies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:367–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer L, McNeil JN (1993) Male investment in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): impact on female longevity and reproductive performance. Funct Ecol 7:209–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski RL, Long CE, Marshall LE, Vetter RS (1981) Courtship solicitation by Colias females. Am Midl Nat 105:334–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski RL, Newton M, Schaefer J (1983) Interspecific variation in the size of the nutrient investment made by male butterflies during copulation. Evolution 37:708–713

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski RL, Gilchrist GW, Terkanian B (1987) Female butterflies mated with recently mated males show reduced reproductive output. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:319–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Parker GA (1989) Nuptial feeding in insects: Mating effort versus paternal investment. Ethology 81:332–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL (ed) (1984) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugawara T (1979) Stretch reception in bursa copulatrix of the butterfly, Pieris rapae crucivora,and its role in behaviour. J Comp Physiol 130:191–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Svärd L (1985) Paternal investment in a monandrous butterfly, Pararge aegeria. Oikos 45:66–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Svärd L, Wiklund C (1986) Different ejaculate strategies in first versus subsequent matings in the monarch butterfly Papilio machaon. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:325–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Svärd L, Wiklund C (1988) Fecundity, egg weight and longevity in relation to multiple matings in the monarch butterfly. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Svärd L, Wiklund C (1989) Mass and production rate of ejaculates in relation to monandry/polyandry in butterflies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:395–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Svärd L, Wiklund C (1991) The effect of ejaculate mass on female reproductive output in the European swallowtail butterfly Papilio machaon. J Insect Behav 4:33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1976) Sexual selection and parental investment in insects. Am Nat 110:152–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M (1988) Multiple matings increase the fecundity of the yellow swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xuthus, in summer generations. J. Insect Behav 1:17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M, Ando S (1993) Influence of mating frequency on lifetime fecundity in wild females of the small white Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Jpn J Entomol 61:691–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N (1994) Variation in nuptial gift quality in bush crickets (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Behav Ecol 5:418–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C, Forsberg J (1991) Sexual size dimorphism in relation to female polygamy and protandry in butterflies: a comparative study of Swedish Peiridae and Satyridae. Oikos 60:373–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C, Kaitala (1995) Sexual selection of large male size in a polyandrous butterfly: the effect of body size on male vs. female reproductive success in Pieris napi. Behav Ecol 6:6–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C, Kaitala A, Lindfors V, Abenius J (1993) Polyandry and its effect on female reproduction in the green-veined white butterfly (Pieris napi L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:25–33

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bissoondath, C.J., Wiklund, C. Protein content of spermatophores in relation to monandry/polyandry in butterflies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37, 365–371 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170583

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170583

Key words

Navigation