Abstract
Chaos theory is a rapidly growing field. As a technical term, “chaos” refers to deterministic but unpredictable processes being sensitively dependent upon initial conditions. Neurobiological models and experimental results are very complicated and some research groups have tried to pursue the “neuronal chaos”. Babloyantz's group has studied the fractal dimension (d) of electroencephalograms (EEG) in various physiological and pathological states. From deep sleep (d=4) to full awakening (d>8), a hierarchy of “strange” attractors paralles the hierarchy of states of consciousness. In epilepsy (petit mal), despite the turbulent aspect of a seizure, the attractor dimension was near to 2. In Creutzfeld-Jacob disease, the regular EEG activity corresponded to an attractor dimension less than the one measured in deep sleep. Is it healthy to be chaotic? An “active desynchronisation” could be favourable to a physiological system. Rapp's group reported variations of fractal dimension according to particular tasks. During a mental arithmetic task, this dimension increased. In another task, a P300 fractal index decreased when a target was identified. It is clear that the EEG is not representing noise. Its underlying dynamics depends on only a few degrees of freedom despite yet it is difficult to compute accurately the relevant parameters.
What is the cognitive role of such a chaotic dynamics? Freeman has studied the olfactory bulb in rabbits and rats for 15 years. Multi-electrode recordings of a few mm2 showed a chaotic hierarchy from deep anaesthesia to alert state. When an animal identified a previously learned odour, the fractal dimension of the dynamics dropped off (near limit cycles). The chaotic activity corresponding to an alert-and-waiting state seems to be a field of all possibilities and a focused activity corresponds to a reduction of the attractor in state space. For a couple of years, Freeman has developed a model of the olfactory bulb-cortex system. The behaviour of the simple model “without learning” was quite similar to the real behaviour and a model “with learning” is developed.
Recently, more and more authors insisted on the importance of the dynamic aspect of nervous functioning in cognitive modelling. Most of the models in the neural-network field are designed to converge to a stable state (fixed point) because such behaviour is easy to understand and to control. However, some theoretical studies in physics try to understand how a chaotic behaviour can emerge from neural networks. Sompolinsky's group showed that a sharp transition from a stable state to a chaotic state occurred in totally interconnected networks depending on the value of one control parameter. Learning in such systems is an open field.
In conclusion, chaos does exist in neurophysiological processes. It is neither a kind of noise nor a pathological sign. Its main role could be to provide diversity and flexibility to physiological processes. Could “strange” attractors in nervous system embody mental forms? This is a difficult but fascinating question.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babloyantz, A. & Destexhe, A. (1986). Low-dimensional chaos in instance of epilepsy. Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 3513–3517.
Babloyantz, A. & Destexhe, A. (1987). Chaos in neural networks. In: M. Candill and C. Butler, eds. Proceedings of the IEEE First International Conference on Neural Networks 4: 31–40. Babloyantz, A. & Destexhe, A. (1988). The Creutzfeld-Jacob disease in the hierarchy of chaotic attractors. In: M. Markus, S. Killer and G. Nicolis. From Chemical to Biological Organization. Springer Series in Synergetics 39: 307–316.
Babloyantz, A., Nicolis, C. & Salazar, J.M. (1985). Evidence of chaotic dynamics of brain activity during the sleep cycle. Phys. Lett. 111A: 152–156.
Baird, B. (1986). Nonlinear dynamics of pattern formation and pattern recognition in the rabbit olfactory bulb. Physica 22D: 150–175.
Basti, B. & Perrone, A. (1989). On the cognitive function of deterministic chaos in neural networks. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington D.C., June 18–22: 657–663.
Benaïm, M. & Samuelides, M. (1990). Emergence of complexity in the dynamic of a diluted neural network. INCC, Juillet 90, Paris.
Bergé, P., ed. (1988). Le Chaos, Théorie et Experience. Paris, Ed. Eyrolles.
Bergé, P., Pomeau, Y. & Vidal, C. (1984). L'Ordre dans le Chaos. Paris, Hermann.
Bressler, S.L. (1990). The gamma wave: a cortical information carrier? TINS 13: 161–162.
Changeux, J.P. & Dehaene, S. (1989). Neuronal models of cognitive function. Cognition 33: 63–109.
Dehaene, S., Changeux, J.P. & Nadal, J.P. (1987). Neural networks that learn temporal sequences by selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 2727–2731.
Eckhorn, R., Bauer, R., Jordan, W., Brosch, M., Kruse, W., Munk, M. & Reitbboeck, H.J. (1988). Coherent oscillations: a mechanism of feature linking in the visual cortex? Multiple electrode and correlation analyses in the cat. Biol. Cybern. 60: 121–130.
Freeman, W.J. (1987). Simulation of chaotic EEG patterns with a dynamic model of the olfactory system. Biol. Cybern. 56: 139–150.
Freeman, W.J. & van Dijk, B.W. (1987). Spatial patterns of visual cortical fast EEG during conditioned reflex in a rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 422: 267–276.
Freeman, W.J., Yao, Y. & Burke, B. (1988). Central pattern generating and recognizing in olfactory bulb: a correlation learning rule. Neural Networks 1: 277–288.
Garfinkel, A. (1987). The virtues of chaos. Behav. Brain Sci. 10: 178–179.
Grassberger, P. & Procaccia, I. (1983a). Characterization of strange attractors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50: 346–349.
Grassberger, P. & Procaccia, I. (1983b). Estimation of the Kolmogorov entropy from a chaotic signal. Phys. Rev. 28A: 2591–2593.
Grassberger, P. & Procaccia, I. (1983c). Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Physics 913: 189–208.
Gray, C.M., Koenig, P., Engel, A.K. & Singer, W. (1989). Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit intercolumnar synchronisation which reflects global stimulus properties. Nature 338: 334–337.
Gray, C.M. & Singer, W. (1989). Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 1698–1702.
Guevara, M.R., Glass, L., Mackey, M.C. & Shrier, A. (1983). Chaos in neurobiology. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC-13: 790–798.
Harth, E. (1983). Order and chaos in neural systems: an approach to the dynamics of higher brain functions. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC-13: 782–789.
Hirsch, M.W. (1989). Convergent activation dynamics in continuous time networks. Neural Networks 2: 331–349.
Holden, A.V., Winlow, W. & Haydon, P.G. (1982). The induction of periodic and chaotic activity in a molluscan neurone. Biol. Cybern. 43: 169–173.
Hopfield, J.J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79: 2554–2558.
Hoppensteadt, F.C. (1989). Intermittent chaos, self-organization, and learning from synchronous synaptic activity in model neuron networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 2991–2995.
Kind, R., Barchas, J.D. & Huberman, B.A. (1984). Chaotic behaviour in dopamine neurodynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 1244–1247.
Mandell, A.J. (1983). From intermittency to transitivity in neuropsychobiological flows. Am. J. Physiol. 245: R484-R494.
Martinerie, J.M. Albano, A.M., Mees, A.I. & Rapp, P.E. (1990). Mutual information, strange attractor and the optimal estimation of dimension. Phys. Rev. (in press).
Miptos, G.J., Burton, R.M.Jr. & Creech, H.C. (1988a). Connectionist networks learn to transmit chaos. Brain res. Bull. 21: 539–546.
Miptos, G.J., Burton, R.M.Jr., Creech, H.C. & Soinila, S.O. (1988b). Evidence for chaos in spike trains of neurons that generate rhythmic motor patterns. Brain res. Bull. 21: 539–546.
Oi, T. (1987). Chaos dynamics executes inductive inference. Biol. Cybern. 57: 47–56.
Pool, R. (1989). Is it healthy to be chaotic? Science 243: 604–607.
Rapp, P.E., Bashore, T.R., Martinerie, J.M. Albano, A.M. Zimmerman, I.D. & Mees, A.I. (1990a). Dynamics of brain electrical activity. In: Brain Topography (in press).
Rapp, P.E., Bashore, T.R., Zimmerman, I.D., Martinerie, J.M., Albano, A.M. & Mees, A.I. (1990b). Dynamical characterization of brain electrical activity. In: S. Krasner, ed. The Ubiquity of Chaos. (in press).
Skarda, C.A. & Freeman, W.J. (1987). How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world (including commentaries and author's response). Behav. Brain Sci. 10: 161–195.
Sompolinsky, H., Crisanti, A. & Sommers, H.J. (1988). Chaos in neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61: 259–262.
Soong, A.C. & Stuart, C.I. (1989). Evidence of chaotic dynamics underlying the human alpha-rythm electroencephalogram. Biol. Cybern. 62: 55–62.
Sporns, O., Gally, J.A., Reeke, G.N. & Edelman, G.M. (1989). Reentrant signalling among simulated neuronal groups leads to coherency in their oscillatory activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 7265–7269.
Thom, R. (1987). Chaos can be overplayed. Brain Sci. 10: 182–183.
Thom, R. (1990). Apologie du Logos. Paris, Hachette.
Van Der Maas, H.L., Verschure, P.F. & Molenaar, P.C. (1990). A note on chaotic behaviour in simple neural networks. Neural Networks 3: 119–122.
Wolf, A., Swift, J.B., Swinney, H.L. & Vastano, J.A. (1985). Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series. Physics 16D: 285–317.
Xu, N. & Xu, J. (1988). The fractal dimension of EEG as a physical measure of conscious human brain. Bull. Math. Biol. 50: 559–565.
Yao, Y. & Freeman, W.J. (1990). Model of biological pattern recognition with spatially chaotic dynamics. Neural Networks 3: 153–170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doyon, B. On the existence and the role of chaotic processes in the nervous system. Acta Biotheor 40, 113–119 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168140
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168140