Abstract
Traveler attitudes and behavior have been shown to correlate in numerous previous studies. However, the correlation by itself leaves open the nature of the interrelationships between traveler attitudes and behavior. For example, attitudes could either cause or be caused by behavior. In fact, both options are concurrently possible. Structural equations are applied to a set of data gathered from Los Angeles central business district workers to ascertain the direction and nature of interrelationships between attitudes and behavior with respect to frequency of taking the bus to work. A mutual dependence between attitudes and behavior is demonstrated in the context of this dataset and behavioral choice situation; behavior and attitudes concurrently cause each other. In addition, it is found that two attitudinal components, perceptions of and affect toward a mode, function differently with respect to travel behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Charles River Associates (1977). “Theoretical Perspectives on Attitude-Behavior Interrelationships in Transport Analysis.” Interim Report 1, Contract DOT-TSC-1326.
Day, G. S. (1973). “Theories of Structure and Change,” in Ward, S. and Robertson, T. S., eds., Consumer Behavior: Theoretical Sources. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Dobson, R. and Tischer, M. L. (1976). “Beliefs about buses, carpools, and single occupant autos: a market segmentation approach,” Transportation Research Forum Proceedings, 17: 200–209.
Dobson, R. and Tischer, M. L. (1978). “A perceptual market segmentation technique for transportation analysis,” Transportation Research Record, in press.
Golob, T. F., Horowitz, A. D. and Wachs, M. (1978). “Attitude-Behavior Relationships in Travel Demand Modeling,” in Hensher, D. A. and Stopher, P. R., eds., Behavioral Travel Modelling, London: Croom Helm (in press).
Hanushek, E. A. and Jackson, J. E. (1977). Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.
Hartgen, D. T. (1974). “Attitudinal and situational variables influencing urban mode choice: some empirical findings,” Transportation, 3: 377–392.
Hartgen, D. T. and Tanner, H. (1970). “Individual attitudes and family activities,” High Speed Ground Transportation Journal, 4: 439–467.
Heise, D. R. (1975). Causal Analysis. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Horowitz, A. D. (1978). “A cognitive dissonance approach to attitudinal modeling in travel demand research.” Paper presented at the 1978 Transportation Research Board Meeting.
Johnston, J. (1972). Econometric Methods, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw Hill.
Lovelock, C. H. (1975). “A market segmentation approach to transit planning, modeling, and management,” Transportation Research Forum Proceedings, 16: 247–258.
Recker, W. W. and Golob, T. B. (1976). “An attitudinal modal choice model,” Transportation Research, 10: 299–310.
Sheth, J. N. (1974). “A Field Study of Attitude Structure and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship,” in Sheth, J. N., ed., Models of Buyer Behavior, pp. New York: Harper and Row.
Stearns, M. D. (1975). Proceedings: TSC Workshop on Attitudinal Surveys for Transportation Planning and Evaluation. UMTA Report No. 06-0049-75-1.
Tardiff, T. J. (1976). “Causal inferences involving transportation attitudes and behavior,” Transportation Research, 11: 397–404.
Theil, H. (1971). Principles of Econometrics. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Tischer, M. L. and Phillips, R. V. (1979). “Causal inferences with longitudinal data: the application of cross-lagged panels and path analysis.” Paper presented at the 1978 Transportation Research Board Meeting. Transportation 8 (in press).
Wachs, M. (1976). “Consumer attitudes toward transit service: an interpretative review,” AIP Journal 42: 96–103.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dobson, R., Dunbar, F., Smith, C.J. et al. Structural models for the analysis of traveler attitude-behavior relationships. Transportation 7, 351–363 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168036
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168036