Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dinnāga's views on reasoning (svārthānumāna)

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bocheński, J. M. (1956). Formale Logik. München: Verlag Karl Alber, 1970 (3rd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brough, John (1951). “Theories of general linguistics in the Sanskrit grammarians” Transactions of the Philological Society, pp. 27–46.

  • Brough, John (1952). “275–02 theory of language Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 14: 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brough, John (1953). “Some Indian theories of meaning” Transactions of the Philological Society, pp. 161–176.

  • Chatterji, Durgacharan (1929–30). A note on the Pramaā \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\) asamuccaya Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 11: 195–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dravid, Raja Ram (1972). The Problem of Universals in Indian Philosophy. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauwallner, Erich (1935). “Beiträge zur Apohalehre” (4th in a series of five articles) Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 42: 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauwallner, Erich (1953). Geschichte der indischen Philosophie. 1. Band. Salzburg: Otto Müller Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauwallner, Erich (1956). Geschichte der indischen Philosophie. 2. Band. Salzburg: Otto Müller Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauwallner, Erich (1957). “Vasubandhu's Vādavidhi \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{h} \) Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd-und Ost-Asiens 1: 104–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauwallner, Erich (1958). Zur Erkenntnislehre des klassischen Samkhya-Systems Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd- und Ost-Asiens 2:84–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauwallner, Erich (1959). “Dignaga, sein Werk und Seine Entwicklung” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd- und Ost-Asiens 3: 83–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauwallner, Erich (1961). “Landmarks in the history of Indian logic” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd- und Ost-Asiens 5: 125–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautama. Nyāyadarśana. Edited with Bhā \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\) ya of Vātsyāyana, Vārttika of Uddyotakara, Tātparya \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\) īkāof Vācaspati and Pariśuddhi of Udayana, by Anantalal Thakur. Mithila Institute \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{S}\)eries Ancient Text no. 20. Muzaffarpur: Prakrit Jain Institute, 1967.

  • Hattori, Masaaki (1968). Dignāga, On Perception. Harvard Oriental Series, Vol. 47. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattori, Masaaki (1977). “The Sautrāntika background of the apoha theory” Buddhist Thought and Asian Civilization. Essays in Honour of Herbert V. Guenther on His Sixtieth Birthday, Emeryville, California; Dharma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, R. J. (1967). “Sensa” Encyclopedia of Philosophy Vol. 7”. Paul Edwards, Editor in Chief. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hospers, John (1953). An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1967 (2nd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajiyama, Yuichi (1973). “Three kinds of affirmation and two kinds of negation in Buddhist philosophy” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens 17: 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ka\( \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)āda. Vaiśe \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\) ikasutra. Edited with the commentary of Candrānanda by Muni Śrī Jambuvijayaji. Gaekwad's Oriental Series No. 136. Baroda: Oriental Institute, 1961.

  • Katsura, Shoryu (1975). New Sanskrit fragments of the Pram7#x0101; \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\) asamuccaya Journal of Indian Philosophy 3 nos 1/2: 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsura, Shoryu (1976). “On Abhidharmakośa VI.4” Indogakuhō (Indological Review) 2:28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, Hidenori (1965). Indo koten ronrigaku no kenkyū: Jinna (Dignāga) no taikei. Tōkyō: Suzuki Gakujutsu Zaidan.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Vallée Poussin, Louis de (1936–7). Documents d'abhidharma. Les deux, les quatre, les trois vérités Mélanges chinois et bouddhiques 5: 159–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matilal, Bimal Krishna (1968). “276–11 remark on the concept of anumeya” The Journal of the Ganganatha Jha Research Institute XXIV Parts 1–4: 151–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matilal, Bimal Krishna (1971). Epistemology, Logic, and Grammar in Indian Philosophical Analysis. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberhammer, Gerhard (1963). “Ein Beitrag zu den Vādatraditionen Indiens” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd- und Ost-Asiens 7: 63–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Curtis F. (1978). “Perception in early Nyāya” Journal of Indian Philosophy 6 No.3:243–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randle, H. N. (1926). Fragments from Dignāga. Prize Publication Fund Vol. IX. London: Royal Asiatic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staal, J. F. (1967). “Indian logic” under article “Logic, History of” Encyclopedia of Philosophy Vol. 4. Paul Edwards, Editor in Chief. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stcherbatsky, Th. (19--). The Central Conception of Buddhism and the Meaning of the Word “Dharma”. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1970 (4th ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stcherbatsky, Th. (1930). Buddhist Logic. Volume One. New York: Dover Publications, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stcherbatsky, Th. (1932). Buddhist Logic. Volume Two. New York: Dover Publications, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinkellner, Ernst (1971). “Wirklichkeit und Begriff bei Dharmakīrti” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd-Asiens 15: 179–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachikawa, Musashi (1970–72). “A sixth-century manual of Indian logic (A translation of the Nyāyapraveśa)” Journal of Indian Philosophy 1: 111–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucci, Giuseppe (1929). “Buddhist logic before Dināga” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society: 451–488.

  • Udayana. Kira \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\) āvalī Praśastapādabhā \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\) yam with the commentary Kira \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\) āvalī of Udayanācārya, edited by Jitendra S. Jetley. Gaekwad's Oriental Series No. 154. Baroda: Oriental Institute, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • 277–14 (1921). A History of Indian Logic. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1971.

  • Warder, A. K. (1970). Indian Buddhism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warder, A. K. (1971). Outline of Indian Philosophy. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, Turrell (1959). “A standard system of Tibetan transcription” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 22: 261–267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Richard P. Hayes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayes, R.P. Dinnāga's views on reasoning (svārthānumāna). J Indian Philos 8, 219–277 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166296

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166296

Search

Navigation