Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency analysis of Norwegian district courts

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the efficiency of the Norwegian district courts with the aim of suggesting ways of improving this efficiency. Pooling the observations for the period 1983 to 1988 efficiency measures are calculated for each court using the nonparametric data envelopment analysis (DEA) method. The results show estimates of overmanning due to technical inefficiency. Comparisons are made between the specialized city courts and the generalized rural courts. When using the yearly observations Malmquist indices are calculated to estimate the rate of productivity change. Finally the paper addresses the questions of how the information from DEA can be used by the courts to become more efficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banker, R.D., A. Charnes, and W.W. Cooper. (1984). “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science 30, 1078–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S.A., F.R. Førsund, and E.S. Jansen. (1991). “Malmquist Productivity Growth during the Deregulation of Norwegian Banking 1980–1989,” Working paper, 1991/2, Norges Bank.

  • Bjurek, H., L. Hjalmarsson, and F.R. Førsund. (1990). “Deterministic Parametric and Nonparametric Estimation of Efficiency in Service Production—A Comparison.” Journal of Econometrics 46, 213–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D.W., L.R. Christansen, and W.E. Diewert. (1982). “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity,” Econometrics 50, 1393–1414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., and W.W. Cooper. (1985). “Preface to Topics in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Annals of Operations Research 2, 59–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. Seiford, and J. Stutz. (1985). “Foundations of Data Envelopment Analysis for Pareto-Koopmans Efficient Empirical Production Functions,” Journal of Econometrics 30, 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deprins, D., L. Simar, and H. Tulkens. (1984). “Measuring Labor-Efficiency in Post Offices.” In M. Marchand, P. Pestiau, and H. Tulkens (eds.), The Performance of Public Enterprises. Concept and Measurement. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M.J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120, 449–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, B. Lindgren, and P. Roos. (1989). “Productivity Developments in Swedish Hospitals,” Discussion Paper 89–3, Department of Economics, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale; also published in A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin, and L. Seiford (eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis: The Theory, Applications and The Process, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F.R. (1992a). “A Comparison of Parametric and Nonparametric Efficiency Measures: The Case of Norwegian Ferries,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F.R. (1992b). “Productivity Growth in Norwegian Ferries.” In H.O. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell, and S.S. Schmidt (eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F.R., and H. Hernæs. (1992). “Ferry Transport in Norway: An Application of DEA Analysis.” In A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin, and L. Seiford (eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis: The Theory, Applications and The Process, forthcoming.

  • Førsund, F.R., and L. Hjalmarsson. (1987). Analyses of Industrial Structure: A Putty-Clay Approach. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F.R., C.A.K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt. (1980). “A Survey of Frontier Production Functions and Theory Relationship to Efficiency Measurement,” Journal of Econometrics 13, 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf, S. (1992). “Approaches to Multifactor Productivity Measurement.” In H.O. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell, and S.S. Schmidt (eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, A.Y., R.C. Morey, and T.J. Cook. (1982). “Evaluationg the Adminstrative Efficiency of Courts,” International Journal of Management Science 10, 401–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, N.C., and O.B. Olesen. (1989). Chance Constrained Efficiency Evaluation, Publications from Department of Management, Odense University no 9/1989, Odense.

  • Malmquist, S. (1953). “Index Number and Indifference Surfaces,” Trabajos de Estadistica 4, 209–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L.M., and R.M. Thrall. (1990). “Recent Developments in DEA—The Mathematical Programming Approach to Frontier Analysis,” Journal of Econometrics 46, 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisk Sentralbyra. (1988). Criminal Statistics 1986. Norges Offisielle Statistikk B 737. Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisk Sentralbyra. (1989a). Civil Judicial Statistics 1987. Norges Offisielle Statistikk B 818. Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisk Sentralbyra. (1989b). Wage Statistics for Central Government Employees 1 October 1988. Norges Offisielle Statistikk B 839. Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statskonsult. (1989). Resultatanalyse ved domstolene. Rapport 1989:2. Oslo.

  • Tulkens, H. (1990). “Non-parametric Efficiency Analyses in Four Service Activities: Retail Banking, Municipalities, Courts and Urban Transit,” CORE discussion paper 9050, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The editor of this paper was Knox Lovell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kittelsen, S.A.C., Førsund, F.R. Efficiency analysis of Norwegian district courts. J Prod Anal 3, 277–306 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158357

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158357

Keywords

Navigation