Skip to main content
Log in

Detectability of correctness: A measure of knowing that one knows

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is important to know that one knows, to be able to discriminate what one knows from what one does not, since that is a basis for making decisions about using and augmenting one's knowledge. A measure of knowing that one knows has been proposed, the detectability of correctness, the ability to discriminate those answers that one gives that are correct from those that are incorrect. This paper presents the background of the problem of knowing that one knows, points out how previous efforts at measurement have been faulty and presents empirical results that indicate that detectability of correctness is a valid and stable measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bamber, D. (1975). “The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 12: 387–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. (1977). “Development, schooling and the acquisition of knowledge”, in R. Anderson, R. Spiro and W. Montague (eds.), Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. (1981). “Metacognitive development and reading”, in R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce and W. F. Brewer (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. and McNeill, D. (1966). “The ‘tip of the tongue’ phenomenon”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5: 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W. (1979). “The feeling of knowing a word's meaning”, British Journal of Psychology 70, part 2: 243–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, W. R. (1972). “Student self-assessment”, Proceedings of the 1972 Conference on Frontiers of Education, Tucson, AZ. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 47–52.

  • Ferrell, W. R. and McGoey, P. J. (1980). “A model of calibration for subjective probabilities”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 26: 32–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1976). “Metacognitive aspects of problem solving”, in L. B. Resnick (ed.), The Nature of Intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1978). “Metacognitive development”, in J. M. Scandura and C. J. Brainerd (eds.), Structural/Process Models of Complex Human Behavior. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. M. and Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. T. (1965). “Memory and the feeling of knowing experience”, Journal of Educational Psychology 56: 208–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. T. (1967). “Memory and memory monitoring processes”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Processing 6: 685–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and Belief. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, H. H. (1964). How Children Fail. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini-Ardehali, J. (1981). Detectability of Correctness: A Signal Detection Measure of Knowing that one Knows. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona.

  • Hunt, D. P. (in press). “Effects of human self-assessment responding on learning”, Journal of Applied Psychology.

  • Lemmon, E. J. (1967). “If I know, do I know that I know?” in A. Stroll (ed.), Epistemology. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S. and Fischhoff, B. (1977). “Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 20: 159–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, R. and Phillips, L. (1981). “Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980”, in D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNicol, D. (1972). A Primer of Signal Detection Theory. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O. and Norens, L. (1980). “Norms of 300 general information questions: accuracy of recall and feeling of knowing ratings”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 29: 338–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastore, R. E. and Scheirer, C. J. (1974). “Signal detection theory: considerations for general application”, Psychological Bulletin 81: 945–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, I. and Hsieh, R. (1969). “Sampling variability of the area under the ROC curve and d′e”, Psychological Bulletin 71: 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShufordJr., H. A. and Brown, T. A. (1975). “Elicitation of personal probabilities and their assessment”, Instructional Science 4: 137–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. and Ferrell, W. R. (1981). “The effect of base rate on calibration of subjective probability for true-false items: model and experiment”, paper presented at the Eighth Research Conference on Subjective Probability, Utility and Decision Making, Budapest, August 1981.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hosseini, J., Ferrell, W.R. Detectability of correctness: A measure of knowing that one knows. Instr Sci 11, 113–127 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154881

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154881

Keywords

Navigation