Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence for a solar distortion rotating with a period of 12.2 days

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most of the day-to-day fluctuation (originally believed to be error) in the Princeton solar oblateness observations is well described as the signal due to a ∼10 km distortion of the solar photosphere rotating rigidly with a period of 12.22±0.12 days (sidereal). This ‘solar-rotator’ signal is well-defined by the observations and seems clearly significant statistically. Owing to the apparent precession of the solar spin-axis on the sky, the signal is not strictly periodic and has a wave-form that evolves with time in a predictable way. The previously discussed enigmatic periodicity of the oblateness residuals, for which no non-solar sources were found, is eliminated when the solar-rotator signal is subtracted. The residual errors are then found to be normally distributed and uncorrelated. Including the solar-rotator signal in the least-square fit increases the implied static oblateness by 16% to Δr = 45.8±3.3 millisec (equatorial excess radius). Both the static oblateness signal and the solar-rotator signal might be interpreted phenomenonologically as ‘brightness’ signals due to a rigidly rotating non-uniform distribution of temperature in the upper photosphere. However, such a description encounters physical difficulties when the requirements of energy and momentum balance are considered. Including the excess static oblateness yields a distortion in the form of an ellipoid whose major axis is tilted 85° from the solar axis. Possible conflicts with other recent observations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brandt, Siegmund; 1970, Statistical and Computational Methods in Data Analysis: (Amsterdam: North Holland Pub.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, R. H.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 159, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, R. H.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 176, 479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, R. H.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 180, 293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, R. H.: 1974, Solar Phys. 37, 271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, R. H.: 1974a, Astrophys. J. 190, 187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, R. H.: 1974b, Astrophys. J. 190, 187 (see for references to other papers on facular signals).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, R. H. and Goldenberg, H. Mark: 1974, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 27, No. 241, 131–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durney, B.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 183, 665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. A. and Stebbins, R. T.: 1975, Astrophys. J. 200, 471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, A. P. and Spiegel, E. A.: 1971, Astrophys. J. 163, 375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. L.: 1975, (private communication, California Institute of Technology).

  • Wilks, S.: 1938, Ann. Math. Stat. 9, 60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by the Sherman Fairchild Distinguished Scholar program at the California Institute of Technology and by the National Science Foundation at both universities under contracts No. MPS 75-01398 at Cal Tech and No. MPS 71-03266 at Princeton University.

Sherman Fairchild Distinguished Scholar (1975).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dicke, R.H. Evidence for a solar distortion rotating with a period of 12.2 days. Sol Phys 47, 475–515 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154759

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154759

Keywords

Navigation