Skip to main content
Log in

Macular electroretinogram as a function of age of subjects

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Macular and paramacular electroretinograms in response to two adjacent checks (6 deg/side), alternating at constant mean luminance, were recorded in 34 normal subjects ranging in age from 16 to 74 years. The macular electroretinogram declines progressively in amplitude with age (R = −0.42; P = 0.013). The amplitude ratio between macular and paramacular responses tends to be independent of age (R = -0.21; P = 0.22).

Age-related changes in the macular electroretinogram shown in our study are consistent with previous anatomical and functional studies, which indicate a deterioration of photoreceptors beyond 20 years of age. These results suggest a possible use of this technique for future studies on macular degeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bagolini B, Porciatti V, Falsini B, Neroni M, Moretti G. Simultaneous macular and paramacular ERGs recorded by standard techniques. Doc Ophthal 1987; 65: 343–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karpe G, Wulfing D. Importance of pupil size in clinical ERG. Acta Ophthalmol 1961: 70 (Suppl): 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ederer F. Shall we count numbers of eyes or numbers of subjects? Arch Ophthalmol 1973; 89: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weale RA. The aging retina. Geriatrics 1985; 3: 425–50.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weleber RG. The effect of age on human cone and rod Ganzfeld electroretinograms. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1981; 20: 392–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martin DA, Heckenlively JR. The normal electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1982; 31: 135–44.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wright CE, Williams DE, Drasdo N, Harding GFA. The influence of age on the electroretinogram and visual evoked potential. Doc Ophthalmol 1985; 59: 365–84.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ordy JM, Brizzee KR, Mansche J. Visual acuity and foveal cone density in the retina of the aged Rhesus monkey. Neurobiol Aging 1980; 1: 133–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gartner S, Henkind P. Aging and degeneration of the human macula: 1. Outer nuclear layer and photoreceptors. Br J Ophthalmol 1981; 65: 23–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weale RA. Retinal senescence. Prog Retinal Res 1986; 5: 53–79.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Owsley C, Sekuler R, Siemsen D. Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vision Res 1983; 23: 689–99.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kilbride PE, Hutman LP, Fishman M, Read JS. Foveal cone pigment density difference in the aging human eye. Vision Res 1986; 26: 321–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brody H. Organization of the cerebral cortex. III. A study of aging in the human cerebral cortex. J Comp Neurol 1955; 102: 511–56.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weale RA. Senile changes in visual acuity. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1975; 95: 36–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bagolini, B., Porciatti, V., Falsini, B. et al. Macular electroretinogram as a function of age of subjects. Doc Ophthalmol 70, 37–43 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154734

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154734

Key words

Navigation