Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of stimulus field size and localization on the binocular pattern reversal visual evoked response

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of the central and peripheral stimulus fields on monocular and binocular amplitude and binocular summation of the pattern reversal visual evoked response were investigated. When the central stimulus field size was smaller than 2.4 °, there was no significant difference between the amplitude of the monocular and the binocular responses, but when it was equal to or larger than 3.2 ° × 3.2 °, the binocular amplitude was significantly larger than the monocular. The value of binocular summation was highest at the central stimulus field of 4.0 ° × 4.0 °; at larger sizes, there were no significant changes in the value. Use of a central stimulus field size larger than 3.2 ° × 3.2 ° was therefore considered a prerequisite for the effective assessment of visual function, especially binocular function, by means of the pattern reversal visual evoked response.

With regard to the role of peripheral stimulus field on pattern reversal response, both the monocular and binocular responses, but particularly the latter, were found to be sensitive to a scotoma produced by covering the center of a full-field stimulus. The value of the binocular summation showed a significant reduction with a small central scotoma. We concluded that the pattern reversal visual evoked response is very sensitive to a central scotoma and that binocular function is mediated mainly through the central stimulus field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katsumi O, Tanino T, Hirose T. Objective evaluation of binocular function with pattern reversal VER. I. Effect of contrast. Acta Ophthalmol 1985; 63: 706–11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Katsumi O, Tanino T, Hirose T. Objective evaluation of binocular function with pattern reversal VER. II. Effect of mean luminosity. Acta Ophthalmol 1986; 64: 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Spekreijse H. Analysis of EEG responses in man evoked by sine wave modulated light. The Hague, The Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk Publishers, 1966: 138.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adachi E, Misago M, Kanayama N. The effect of field size on spatial frequency characteristics determined by human VECPs. Folia Ophthalmol Jpn 1979; 30: 657–60.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adachi-Usami E. Stimulus field, element size and human VECP. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1980; 23: 227–35.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katsumi O, Matsuhashi M, Oguchi Y. Effect of stimulus parameters on the pattern reversal VECP. Acta Soc Ophthalmol Jpn 1980; 84: 1723–30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoeckstra J, Van der Good DPJ, Van der Brink G, Bilsen FA. The influence of the number of cycles upon the visual contrast threshold for spatial sine wave patterns. Vision Res 1974; 14: 365–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Savoy RL, McCann JJ. Visibility of low spatial frequency sine wave targets: dependence on number of cycles. J Opt Soc Am 1974; 65: 343–50.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mitsuyu M, Yanashima K. Binocular additivity of visual evoked cortical potentials in man. The effect of luminance and contrast. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1981; 31: 421–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Röver J, Schaubele G, Bernd K. Macula and periphery: their contributions to the visual evoked potentials (VEP) in humans. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1980; 214: 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Groneberg A, Teping C. Pattern evoked cortical potentials to simultaneous stimulation of both eyes. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1980; 27: 313–21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tsutsui J, Kimura H, Fukai S. Objective perimetry by visual evoked cortical potential. Characteristics of field location and binocular effect. Acta Soc Ophthalmol Jpn 1981; 85: 1567–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katsumi, O., Hirose, T. & Tanino, T. Effect of stimulus field size and localization on the binocular pattern reversal visual evoked response. Doc Ophthalmol 69, 293–305 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154410

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154410

Key words

Navigation