Abstract
The authors discuss the process of asking and answering yes/no-questions in personal survey interviews from a conversational perspective. They examine the process with regard to yes/no-questions as given in the questionnaire and with regard to the yes/no-questions that interviewers may pose in the subsequent stages of a sequence, when they are probing on the respondent's initial answer or are trying to solve other problems. Hypotheses are derived from the co-operation principle and the politeness principle of conversation, and then empirically evaluated for survey interview settings. In the relatively informal stages of the answering process (subsequences) the conversations appear to go quite well according to the conversation rules, but in the beginning formal stage to a much lesser degree. In particular it has been observed that interviewers strongly prefer to ask one-sided positive yes/no-questions in the subsequences, and, secondly, that respondents usually give agreeing answers to these yes/no-questions. It is argued that this “normal” conversation strategy may seriously affect the validity of the information obtained, and, more generally, that the practical demands from the conversation rules on the interviewer's behaviour set limits on the researcher's abstract demands on that behaviour.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brenner, M. (1982). Response effects of ‘role-restricted’ characteristics of the interviewer, pp. 13–165 in W.Dijkstra and J.van derZouwen (eds.), Response Behaviour in the Survey-Interview. London: Academic Press.
Brenner, M. (1985). “Survey interviewing”, pp. 9–36 in M.Brenner, J.Brown and D.Canter (eds.), The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches. London: Academic Press.
Cannell, C.F., S.A.Lawson, & D.L.Hausser (1975). A Technique for Evaluating Interviewer Performance. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
Dijkstra, W., L.Van derVeen, & J.Van derZouwen (1985). A field experiment on interviewer-respondent interaction, pp. 37–63 in M.Brenner, J.Brown and D.Canter (eds.), The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches London: Academic Press.
Dijkstra, W. (1987). Interviewing style and respondent behavior: an experimental study of the survey-interview, Sociological Methods and Research 16: 309–334.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation, pp. 41–58 in P.Cole and J.L.Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Volume 3: Speech Acts. London: Academic Press.
Leech, G. (1983). The Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Loosveldt, G. (1986). Kwaliteitscontrole van survey-data: effecten van het interviewergedrag (Controlling the quality of survey data: Effects of interviewer behaviour), Economisch en Sociaal Tijdschrift 40: 445–60.
Schuman, H. & S., Presser (1981). Questions and Answers: Experiments on Question Form, Wording and Context. London: Academic Press.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts. London: Cambridge University Press.
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Van derZouwen, J., W.Dijkstra, & J.Van deBovenkamp (1986). The control of interaction processes in survey interviews, pp. 55–63 in F.Geyer and J.Van derZouwen (eds.), Sociocybernetic Paradoxes: Observation, Control and Evolution of Self-Steering Systems. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Molenaar, N.J., Smit, J.H. Asking and answering yes/no-questions in survey interviews: a conversational approach. Qual Quant 30, 115–136 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153983
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153983