Skip to main content
Log in

The variation of solar proton energy spectra and size distribution with heliolongitude

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A statistical study of the initial phases of 185 solar particle events has been carried out using the data from the Goddard cosmic ray experiments on IMPs IV and V. Special emphasis is placed on the identification of the associated solar flare. The parent flare can be determined for 68 % of the events. It appears probable that most of the unidentified increases occur on the non-visible disc of the Sun. The existence of a ‘preferred-connection’ longitude between 20°W and 80° W is established by examining the heliolongitude of all the flare associated events. While power law in differential kinetic energy appears to give the best representation it cannot be distinguished from exponential in rigidity over the limited range of 20–80 MeV. It is argued that for heliolongitudes λ = 20–80°W, γ p ,the spectral index determined at the time of maximum particle intensity is representative of the source spectra. For these heliolongitudes γ p displays a surprisingly small range with magnitudes varying mainly between 2.0 and 3.1. At lower energies γ p is smaller. Previous electron measurements provide almost identical average values of the source spectra over similar energy ranges. These results are discussed briefly in terms of Fermi acceleration models.

For flare events located further away from the nominal field line connecting the Earth and the Sun, γ p becomes progressively steeper. The lower energies (4–20 MeV) do not exhibit this behavior. It is argued that this spectral steepening at the higher energies is the result of energy-dependent escape during the coronal diffusion process. The size distribution can be represented by a power law of the form dN/dI=I where N is the number of events per unit intensity and I is the maximum particle intensity at a given energy (usually taken at 40 MeV) with α ≈ 1.15 ±0.1. The same value of a applies to both eastern and western hemisphere events. The event size, on the average, appears to decrease approximately two orders of magnitude for each 60° away from the preferred connection region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altschuler, M. D. and Newkirk, G., Jr.: 1969, Solar Phys. 9, 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axford, W. I.: 1965, Planetary Space Sci. 13, 1301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axford, W. I.: 1970, USSR Academy of Sciences Seminar on Cosmic Ray Generation on the Sun, Leningrad.

  • Barcus, J. R.: 1969, Solar Phys. 8, 186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barouch, E., Engelmann, J., Gros, M., Koch, L., and Masse, Pl: 1970, in C. Manno and D. E. Page (ed.), Intercorrelated Satellite Observations Related to Solar Events, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, p. 448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barouch, E., Gros, M., and Masse, P.: 1971, Solar Phys. 19, 483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, C. O., Williams, D. J., Hagge, D. E., and McDonald, F. B.: Solar Proton Monitoring Experiment, Solar-Geophysical Data, descriptive text, February 1968.

  • Bryant, D. A., Cline, T. L., Desai, U. D., and McDonald, F. B.: 1962, J. Geophys. Res. 67, 4983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, D. A., Cline, T. L., Desai, U. D., and McDonald, F. B.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 141, 478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucknam, D. B. and Lincoln, J. V.: 1971, World Data Center A, Report UAG-13, Data on the Solar Proton Event of November 2, 1969, through the Geomagnetic Storm of November 8–10, 1969.

  • Burlaga, L. F.: 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 4449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datlowe, D.: 1971, Solar Phys. 17, 436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilworth, C., Maccagni, D., Perotti, F., Tanzi, E. G., Mercier, J. P., Raviart, A., Treguer, L., and Gros, M.: 1972, Solar Phys. 23, 487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englade, R. C.: 1971, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, C. Y., Pick, M., Pyle, R., Simpson, J. A., and Smith, D. R.: 1968, J. Geophys. Res. 73, 1555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feit, J.: 1973, Solar Phys. 29, 211

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, L. A. and Axford, W. I.: 1969, Solar Phys. 7, 486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freier, P. S. and Webber, W. R.: 1963, J. Geophys. Res. 68, 1605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. and Hamberger, S. M.: 1969, Solar Phys. 8, 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, L. J. and Axford, W. I.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 154, 1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, R. E., Nolte, J. T., Roelof, E. C., and Reinhard, R.: 1973, 13th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Denver, Vol. 2, 1367.

  • I.A.U., Quarterly Bulletin on Solar Activity, published by the Eidgenössische Sternwarte Zürich, ed. by M. Waldmeier.

  • Jones, S. L., Ludwig, G. H., Stilwell, D. E., Trainor, J. H., and Way, S. H.: 1967, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science (NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center), Vol. NS-14, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, J. H.: 1970, Thesis. NASA/GSFC X-611-69-396.

  • Krimigis, S. M.: 1973, in R. Ramaty and R. G. Stone (eds.), Proc. Symp. on High Energy Phenomena on the Sun, NASA/GSFC X-693-73-193, p. 478.

  • Krimigis, S. M. and Verzariu, P.: 1971, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzerotti, L. J.: 1972, Proc. National Symp. Natural and Manmade Radiation in Space, NASA TM-X-2440, p. 193.

  • Lanzerotti, L. J.: 1973, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 3942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, R. P.: 1970, Solar Phys. 12, 266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, R. P.: 1974, Space Sci. Rev. 16, 189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, J. E. and Stone, E. C.: 1973, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, K. G. and Rao, U. R.: 1970, Space Sci. Rev. 11, 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, K. G., Rao, U. R., and Bukata, R. P.: 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 4293.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, K. G., Rao, U. R., and Ness, N. F.: 1968, J. Geophys. Res. 73, 4159.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, K. G., Rao, U. R., Bukata, R. P., and Keath, E. P.: 1971, Solar Phys. 18, 100.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, F. B. and Fichtel, C. E.: 1974, in McDonald and Fichtel (eds.), High Energy Particles and Quanta in Astrophysics, Chapt. 5.

  • McDonald, F. B. and Van Hollebeke, M. A.: 1973, in R. Ramaty and R. G. Stone (eds.), Proc. Symp. on High Energy Phenomena on the Sun, NASA/GSFC X-693-73-193, p. 404.

  • McKibben, R. B.: 1972, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 3957.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKibben, R. B.: 1973, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 7184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. S., Stone, E. C., and Vogt, R. E.: 1971, Phys. Rev. Letters 26, 663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newkirk, G., Jr.: 1973, in R. Ramaty and R. G. Stone (eds.), Proc. Symp. on High Energy Phenomena on the Sun, NASA/GSFC X-693-73-193, p. 453.

  • Palmer, I. D.: 1973, Solar Phys. 30, 235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1965, Planetary Space Sci. 13, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, U. R., McCracken, K. G., Allum, F. R., Palmeira, R. A. R., Bariley, W. C., and Palmer, I.: 1971, Solar Phys. 19, 209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, G. C.: 1964, J.Geophys. Res. 69, 2659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard, R. and Roelof, E. C.: 1973, 13th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Denver, Vol. 2, 1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard, R. and Wibberenz, G.: 1973, 13th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Denver, Vol. 2, 1372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard, R. and Wibberenz, G.: 1974, Solar Phys. 36, 473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzman, E.: 1963, Ann. Astrophys. 26, 234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simnett, G. M.: 1971, Solar Phys. 20, 448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simnett, G. M.: 1972, Solar Phys. 22, 189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simnett, G. M.: 1974, Space Sci. Rev. 16, 257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smerd, S. F.: 1970, Proc. Astron. Soc. Australia 1, 305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solar Geophysical Data, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce, Boulder, Colo, 80302.

  • Sturrock, P. A.: 1974, in G. Newkirk Jr. (ed.), ‘Coronal Disturbances’, IAU Symp. 57, 437.

  • Syrovatsky, S. I.: 1970, Acta Phys. Acad. Sci. Hungaricae 29, Suppl. 1, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. J.: 1970, Proc. Meeting on Operation PCA 69, AFCRL-70-0625, p. 15.

  • Van Hollebeke, M., Wang, J. R., and McDonald, F. B.: 1972, UAG-24, 1, 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hollebeke, M. A., Wang, J. R., and McDonald, F. B.: 1974, Catalogue of Solar Cosmic Ray Events, IMPs IV and V (May 1967–December 1972), NASA/GSFC X-661-74-27.

  • Wentzel, D. G.: 1965, J. Geophys. Res. 70, 2716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirin, H. and Tanaka, K.: 1973, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 5, 282.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Also: Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, Md., U.S.A.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Hollebeke, M.A.I., Ma Sung, L.S. & McDonald, F.B. The variation of solar proton energy spectra and size distribution with heliolongitude. Sol Phys 41, 189–223 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152967

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152967

Keywords

Navigation