Abstract
Previous global models of coronal magnetic fields have used a geometrical construction based on a spherical source surface because of requirements for computational speed. As a result they have had difficulty accounting for (a) the tendency of full magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models to predict non-radial plasma flow out to r ∼ 10r ⊙ and (b) the appreciable magnitude, ∼ 3γ, of B r , (the radial component of B) consistently observed at r ∼ 1 AU. We present a new modelling technique based on a non-spherical source surface, which is taken to be an isogauss of the underlying potential field generated by currents in or below the photosphere. This modification of the source surface significantly improves the agreement between the geometrical construction and the MHD solution while retaining most of the computational ease provided by a spherical source surface. A detailed comparison between the present source-surface model and the MHD solution is made for the internal dipole case. The resulting B field agrees well in magnitude and direction with the coronal B field derived from the full MHD equations. It shows evidence of the slightly equatorward meridional plasma flow that is characteristic of the MHD solution. Moreover, the B field obtained by using our non-spherical source surface agrees well with that observed by spacecraft in the vicinity of the Earth's orbit. Applied to a solar dipole field with a moment of 1 G-r 3⊙ , the present model predicts that B r at r ∼ 1 AU lies in the range of ∼ 1–2γ and is remarkably insensitive to heliomagnetic latitude. Our method should be applicable also to more general (i.e., more realistic) configurations of the solar magnetic field. Isogauss surfaces for two representative solar rotations, as calculated from expansions of observed photospheric magnetic-field data, are found to show large and significant deviations from sphericity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altschuler, M. D. and Newkirk, G., Jr.: 1969, Solar Phys. 9, 131.
Altschuler, M. D., Levine, R. H., Stix, M., and Harvey, J. W.: 1977, Solar Phys. 51, 345.
Dessler, A. J.: 1967, Rev. Geophys. 5, 1.
Durney, B. and Pneuman, G. W.: 1975, Solar Phys. 40, 461.
Durney, B. R. and Roberts, P. H.: 1971, Astrophys. J. 170, 319.
Hundhausen, A. J.: 1970, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 8, 729.
Hundhausen, A. J.: 1977, in J. B. Zirker (ed.), Coronal Holes and High Speed Wind Streams, Colorado Assoc. Univ. Press, Boulder, p. 225.
Jokipii, J. R., Levy, E. H., and Hubbard, W. B.: 1977, Astrophys. J. 213, 861.
Kennel, C. F.: 1978, personal communication.
Lemaire, J. and Scherer, M.: 1971, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 7479.
Levine, R. H.: 1977, personal communication.
Northrop, T. G.: 1963, The Adiabatic Motion of Charged Particles, Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp. 6–8.
Parker, E. N.: 1958, Astrophys. J. 128, 664.
Pneuman, G. W. and Kopp, R. A.: 1971a, Solar Phys. 18, 258.
Pneuman, G. W. and Kopp, R. A.: 1971b, in R. A. Howard (ed.), ‘Solar Magnetic Fields’, IAU Symp. 43, 526.
Rhodes, E. J., Jr. and Smith, E. J.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 2123.
Schatten, K. H.: 1971, Cosmic Electrodyn. 2, 232.
Schatten, K. H., Wilcox, J. M., and Ness, N. F.: 1969, Solar Phys. 6, 442.
Smith, E. J., Tsurutani, B. T., and Rosenberg, R. L.: 1978, J. Geophys. Res. 83, 717.
Svalgaard, L. and Wilcox, J. M.: 1976, Nature 262, 766.
Thomas, G. B., Jr.: 1960, Calculus and Analytic Geometry, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., p. 589.
Wilcox, J. M.: 1968, Space Sci. Rev. 8, 258.
Wilcox, J. M. and Ness, N. F.: 1965, J. Geophys. Res. 70, 5793.
Yeh, T. and Pneuman, G. W.: 1977, Solar Phys. 54, 419.
Zirker, J. B. (ed.): 1977, Coronal Holes and High Speed Wind Streams, Colorado Assoc. Univ. Press, Boulder.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schulz, M., Frazier, E.N. & Boucher, D.J. Coronal magnetic-field model with non-spherical source surface. Sol Phys 60, 83–104 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152334
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152334