Skip to main content
Log in

Formative and non-formative evaluation

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Formative and non-formative evaluation are examined from the viewpoints of adaptation to improve individual performance and maintenance to preserve an existing system. Distinctions are made in terms of the experimental method, criterion-referenced measures, accessible events, and individual behavior. The functions of other distinguishing features are also examined, such as the quantification of weak and indirect variables for active maintenance. A case is made for the advantages and disadvantages of both types of evaluations. An increased role for formative evaluation is advocated as well as a deliberate rather than an “accidental” use of non-formative evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby, W. R. (1960). Design for a Brain: The Origin of Adaptive Behavior, Second edition, London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. R. (1964). An Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. R. (1973). Editorial, Behavioral Science (January). 18(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D. (1967). On Method. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. (1957). “The Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology,” American Psychologist. 12, 671–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. (1963). “Course Improvement Through Evaluation,” Teachers College Record. 64(8), 672–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukes, W. F. (1965). “N=1,” Psychological Bulletin. 64(1), 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1963). “Instructional Technology and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: Some Questions,” American Psychologist. 18, 519–521. (Republished 1971 in W. J. Popham, ed., Criterion-Referenced Measurement, 5–14. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1972). “Individuals and Learning: The New Aptitudes,” Educational Researcher (June). 1(6), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R., and Klaus, D. (1962). “Proficiency Measurement: Assessing Human Performance,” in R.Gagne, ed., Psychological Principles of Systems Development, 419–474. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, R. B. (1973). “Persistence and Loose Coupling in Living Systems,” Behavioral Science (March). 18(2), 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E. (1967). “The Process of Instructional Programing,” in P.Lange, ed., Programed Instruction: The Sixty-sixth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, 61–79. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, L. (1957). Statistical Theory. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, W. (1973). “Do You Crave a Life Without Choice?” Psychology Today (April). 6(11), 78–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markle, (1967). “Empirical Testing of Programs,” in P.Lange, ed., Programed Instruction: The Sixty-sixth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, 104–138. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1973). “Testing for Competence Rather than for ‘Intelligence’,” American Psychologist (January). 28(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNemar, Q. (1940). “Sampling in Psychological Research,” Psychological Bulletin (June). 37, 331–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, G. P. (1972). “The Origins and Aims of Epistemics,” Instructional Science (March). 1(1), 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1967). “The Methodology of Evaluation,” AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation. 1, 39–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of Scientific Research: Evaluating Experimental Data in Psychology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. (1961). Cumulative Record. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. (1969). Contingencies of Reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoresen, C. E. (1973). “Behavioral Humanism,” in C. E.Thoresen, ed., Behavior Modification in Education: The Seventy-second Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I, 385–421. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zifferblatt, S. M. (1973). “Behavior Systems,” in C. E.Thoresen, ed., Behavior Modification in Education: The Seventy-second Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I, 317–350. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moxley, R.A. Formative and non-formative evaluation. Instr Sci 3, 243–283 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00150475

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00150475

Keywords

Navigation