Abstract
Formative and non-formative evaluation are examined from the viewpoints of adaptation to improve individual performance and maintenance to preserve an existing system. Distinctions are made in terms of the experimental method, criterion-referenced measures, accessible events, and individual behavior. The functions of other distinguishing features are also examined, such as the quantification of weak and indirect variables for active maintenance. A case is made for the advantages and disadvantages of both types of evaluations. An increased role for formative evaluation is advocated as well as a deliberate rather than an “accidental” use of non-formative evaluation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, W. R. (1960). Design for a Brain: The Origin of Adaptive Behavior, Second edition, London: Chapman & Hall.
Ashby, W. R. (1964). An Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Methuen.
Ashby, W. R. (1973). Editorial, Behavioral Science (January). 18(1), 1–6.
Bakan, D. (1967). On Method. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cronbach, L. (1957). “The Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology,” American Psychologist. 12, 671–684.
Cronbach, L. (1963). “Course Improvement Through Evaluation,” Teachers College Record. 64(8), 672–683.
Dukes, W. F. (1965). “N=1,” Psychological Bulletin. 64(1), 74–79.
Glaser, R. (1963). “Instructional Technology and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: Some Questions,” American Psychologist. 18, 519–521. (Republished 1971 in W. J. Popham, ed., Criterion-Referenced Measurement, 5–14. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology.)
Glaser, R. (1972). “Individuals and Learning: The New Aptitudes,” Educational Researcher (June). 1(6), 5–13.
Glaser, R., and Klaus, D. (1962). “Proficiency Measurement: Assessing Human Performance,” in R.Gagne, ed., Psychological Principles of Systems Development, 419–474. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Glassman, R. B. (1973). “Persistence and Loose Coupling in Living Systems,” Behavioral Science (March). 18(2), 83–98.
Green, E. (1967). “The Process of Instructional Programing,” in P.Lange, ed., Programed Instruction: The Sixty-sixth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, 61–79. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hogben, L. (1957). Statistical Theory. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Kaufmann, W. (1973). “Do You Crave a Life Without Choice?” Psychology Today (April). 6(11), 78–83.
Markle, (1967). “Empirical Testing of Programs,” in P.Lange, ed., Programed Instruction: The Sixty-sixth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, 104–138. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McClelland, D. C. (1973). “Testing for Competence Rather than for ‘Intelligence’,” American Psychologist (January). 28(1), 1–14.
McNemar, Q. (1940). “Sampling in Psychological Research,” Psychological Bulletin (June). 37, 331–365.
Meredith, G. P. (1972). “The Origins and Aims of Epistemics,” Instructional Science (March). 1(1), 9–29.
Scriven, M. (1967). “The Methodology of Evaluation,” AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation. 1, 39–83.
Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of Scientific Research: Evaluating Experimental Data in Psychology. New York: Basic Books.
Skinner, B. (1961). Cumulative Record. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. (1969). Contingencies of Reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Thoresen, C. E. (1973). “Behavioral Humanism,” in C. E.Thoresen, ed., Behavior Modification in Education: The Seventy-second Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I, 385–421. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zifferblatt, S. M. (1973). “Behavior Systems,” in C. E.Thoresen, ed., Behavior Modification in Education: The Seventy-second Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I, 317–350. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moxley, R.A. Formative and non-formative evaluation. Instr Sci 3, 243–283 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00150475
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00150475