Skip to main content
Log in

Partial resistance of barley to leafrust, Puccinia hordei. I. Effect of cultivar and development stage on latent period

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The latent period of barley leafrust, Puccinia hordei, was studied in a number of cultivars at different development stages and growing conditions. The relative latent period of the different cultivars was not affected by temperature. Other environmental factors, like daylength and light-intensity did not seem to have any effect either. The development stage of the plant and the genotype on the other hand influenced the latent period greatly. The latent period became longer for all cultivars tested from the seedling stage onward until a maximum was reached with the young flag leaf at heading. For the most susceptible cultivar, L94, the relative latent period increased from the primary leaf in the seedling stage, set at 100%, to 117 in the young flag leaf. With the fairly resistant cultivar Vada the relative latent period increased from 123 to 233. The genotypic differences in latent period are very much greater in the adult plants stage than in the seedling stage. This and the fact that the relative latent period of the seedling does not predict the relative latent period of the adult plant very well, necessitates a cautious approach of seedling data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caldwell, R. M., 1968. Breeding for general and or specific plant disease resistance. 3rd Proc. Int. Wheat Genet. Symp.: 207–216.

  • Chamberlain, N. H. & J. K. Doodson, 1972. Brown rust of barley. Agriculture, Lond. 79: 302–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, N. H., J. K. Doodson & M. H. Meadway, 1972. A technique for the evaluation of the resistance of barley varieties to infection with brown rust (Puccinia hordei Otth.). J. natn. Inst. agric. Bot. 12: 440–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, B. C., 1972. The histology of race non-specific resistance to Puccinia hordei Otth. in barley. Proc. Eur. and Medit. Cereal Rusts Conf., Prague, I: 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrer, W., 1898. The making and improvement of wheats for Australian conditions. Agr. Gaz. N.S. Wales 9: 131–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, H. H., W. H. Chapman & R. D. Barnett, 1972. Horizontal resistance of red rust proof oats to Crown rust. Phytopath. 62: 414–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, Y. R. & J. C. Zadoks, 1970. Uredospore production and sporulation period of Puccinia recondita f. sp. triticina on primary leaves of wheat. Neth. J. Pl. Path. 76: 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseman, J. G., 1969. Studies of inheritance of resistance in barley to pathogenic organisms, 1963–1969. Barley Genetics II, 1969: 535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, J. E. van der, 1963. Plant diseases: Epidemics and control. Academic press, NY and London. 349 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, J. E. van der 1968. Disease resistance in plants. Academic press, NY and London. 206 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaper, S., 1951. Die Bedeuting der Incubationszeit für die Züchtung Krautfäuleresistenter Kartoffelsorten. Z. PflZüchtung 30: 292–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarwood, C. E., 1961. Uredospore production by Uromyces phaseoli. Phytopathology 51: 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaag, D. E. van der, 1959. Some observations on breeding for resistance to Phytophthora infestans. Eur. Pot. J. 2: 278–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks, J. C., 1972. Modern concepts of disease resistance in cereals. Proc. 6th Congress. Eucarpia, Cambridge: 89–98.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parlevliet, J.E. Partial resistance of barley to leafrust, Puccinia hordei. I. Effect of cultivar and development stage on latent period. Euphytica 24, 21–27 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00147164

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00147164

Keywords

Navigation