Abstract
Technological conflicts are commonly seen as rooted in problems of risk perception and risk communication. This view is seriously deficient in that it does not fully appreciate that despite their technical content, the conflicts are at bottom political. Conflict of interests and values is evident even in differences over scientific agendas, methods, and interpretations, and especially in the inevitable cacophony of messages describing scientific knowledge to non-experts. Efforts to produce clear, accurate, and unbiased messages about risks will not even solve communication problems, let alone reduce conflict, because ‘unbiased’ is undefinable. Clear and accurate messages can always be devised to support a variety of policy positions, and they will be, whenever controversy persists. The article substantiates these points and outlines some realistic approaches to risk communication that enable nonexperts to learn through conflict what they cannot learn from carefully crafted risk messages.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, B. N. (1979). ‘Identifying Environmental Chemicals Causing Mutations and Cancer,’ Science 204: 587–593.
Ames, B. N., R. Magaw, and L. S. Gold (1987). ‘Ranking Possible Carcinogenic Hazards,’ Science 236: 271–280.
Anderson, P. D. (1988). ‘Scientific Origins of Incompatibility in Risk Assessment,’ Statistical Science 3: 320–327.
Burns, T. R. and R. Ueberhorst (1988). Creative Democracy: Systematic Conflict Resolution and Policymaking in a World of High Science and Technology, New York: Praeger.
Cleveland, W. S. (1986). The Elements of Graphing Data, Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.
Covello, V., P. M. Sandman, and P. Slovic (1988). Risk Communication. Risk Statistics, and Risk Comparison: A Manual for Plant Managers, Washington, D.C.: Chemical Manufacturers Association.
Dickson, D. (1984). The New Politics of Science, New York: Pantheon Books.
Dietz, T. and R. W. Rycroft (1987). The Risk Professionals, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Dietz, T., P. C. Stern, and R. W. Rycroft (1989). ‘Definitions of Conflict and the Legitimation of Resources: The Case of Environmental Risk,’ Sociological Forum 4: 47–70.
Freudenburg, W. R. (1988). ‘Perceived Risk, Real Risk: Social Science and the Art of Probabilistic Risk Assessment,’ Science 242: 44–49.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Gould, L. C., G. T. Gardner, D. R. DeLuca, A. R. Tiemann, L. W. Doob, and J. A. J. Stolwijk (1988). Perceptions of Technological Risks and Benefits, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Gould, S. J. (1981). The Mismeasure of Man, New York: Norton.
Habermas, J. (1970). Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics, Boston: Beacon Press.
Hohenemser, C., R. W. Kates, and P. Slovic (1983). ‘The Nature of Technological Hazard,’ Science 220: 378–384.
Holdren, J. P., K. R. Smith, and G. Morris (1979). ‘Energy: Calculating the Risks (II),’ Science 204: 564–567.
Inhaber, H. (1979). ‘Risk with Energy from Conventional and Nonconvential Sources,’ Science 203: 718–723.
Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge.
Keller, E. F. (1983). A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock, New York: Freeman.
Lave, L. B. (1987). ‘Health and Safety Risk Analyses: Information for Better Decisions,’ Science 236: 291–295.
Lichtenstein, S., B. Fischhoff, and L. D. Phillips (1982). ‘Calibration of Probabilities: The State of the Art to 1980,’ in D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky, eds. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge.
Lichtenstein, S., P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, M. Layman, and B. Combs (1978). ‘Judged Frequency of Lethal Events,’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4: 551–578.
Lowrance, W. W. (1976). Of Acceptable Risk. Science and the Determination of Safety, Los Altos, Calif.: William Kauffmann, Inc.
Marshall, C. (1987). ‘Fetal Protection Policies: An Excuse for Workplace Hazard,’ Nation 244: 532–534 (April 25).
Miller, N. E. (1969). ‘Learning of Visceral and Glandular Responses,’ Science 163: 434–445.
National Research Council (1983). Institutional Means for Risk Assessment in the Federal Government, Washington: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (1989). Improving Risk Communication, Washington: National Academy Press.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1978). Risk Assessment Review Group Report to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-0400. Washington: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Otway, H. J. and D. von Winterfeldt (1982). ‘Beyond Acceptable Risk: On the Social Acceptability of Technologies,’ Policy Sciences 14: 247–256.
Rosenthal, R. and D. B. Rubin (1982). ‘A Simple, General Purpose Display of the Magnitude of Experimental Effect,’ Journal of Educational Psychology 74: 166–169.
Schnaiberg, A. (1980). The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity, New York: Oxford.
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). ‘Normative Influences on Altruism,’ in L. Berkowitz, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). New York: Academic Press.
Slovic, P. (1987). ‘Perception of Risk,’ Science 236: 280–285.
Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein (1978). ‘Accident Probabilities and Seat Belt Usage: A Psychological Perspective,’ Accident Analysis and Prevention 10: 281–285.
Smith, R. J. (1983). ‘White House Names New EPA Chief,’ Science 220: 35–36.
Smith, R. J. (1986). ‘Chernobyl Report Surprisingly Detailed but Avoids Painful Truths, Experts Say,’ Washington Post, August 27: A25.
Stern, P. C., T. Dietz, and J. S. Black (1986). ‘Support for Environmental Protection: The Role of Moral Norms,’ Population and Environment 8: 204–222.
Sun, M. (1984a). ‘Acid Rain Report Allegedly Suppressed,’ Science 225: 1374.
Sun, M. (1984b). ‘OSHA Rule is Curbed by Budget Office,’ Science 225: 603–604.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1973). ‘Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability,’ Cognitive Psychology 5: 207–232.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1981). ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,’ Science 211: 453–458.
von Winterfeldt, D. and W. Edwards (1984). ‘Patterns of Conflict About Risky Technologies,’ Risk Analysis 4: 55–68.
Whittemore, A. S. (1983). ‘Facts and Values in Risk Analysis for Environmental Toxicants,’ Risk Analasis 3 (1): 23–33.
Winner, L. (1986). ‘On Not Hitting the Tar Baby,’ Chapter 8, in L. Winner, The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stern, P.C. Learning through conflict: a realistic strategy for risk communication. Policy Sci 24, 99–119 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146466
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146466