Skip to main content
Log in

The policy movement as a policy problem

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The policy movement is unified by a common interest in the improvement of policy decisions through scientific inquiry. The movement is differentiated, however, because this common interest is highly ambiguous and subject to interpretation from different perspectives. This paper applies a policy sciences perspective to the movement's disappointments over the last few decades, and in particular, the failure to realize earlier aspirations for rational, objective analysis on the more important and controversial policy issues. The paper offers a definition and diagnosis of the underlying problem, and suggests what can be done about it as a matter of individual and collective choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, C. (1965). ‘A City Is Not a Tree,’ Architectural Forum 122 (April and May): 58–62 and 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, J. (1983). ‘Harvard vs. Democracy,’ The Washington Monthly 15 (March): 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, W. (1978). Forecasting: An Appraisal for Policy-Makers and Planners, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, W. (1981). ‘The Forecasting Potential of Complex Models,’ Policy Sciences 13: 247–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, W. (1982). ‘Political Forecasting: The Missing Link,’ Journal of Forecasting 1: 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, W. (1987a). ‘The Evolution of the Policy Sciences: Understanding the Rise and Avoiding the Fall,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5: 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, W. (1987b). ‘Policy Sciences and the Economic Approach in a “Post-Positivist” Era.’ Policy Sciences 20: 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, G. (1984). ‘On a Code of Ethics for Policy Experts,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 3: 561–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, R. K. (1978). ‘Analysis, War, and Decision: Why Intelligence Failures are Inevitable,’ World Politics 31: 61–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. E. (1961). The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. D. (1983). ‘Some Costs and Consequences of Large-Scale Social Systems Modeling,’ Behavioral Sciences 28: 166–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R. D. (1982). ‘The Policy Sciences as Science,’ Policy Sciences 15: 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R. D. (1986). ‘Case-Wise Policy Information Systems: Redefining Poverty,’ Policy Sciences 19: 201–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R. D. (1987). ‘Conceptual Tools for Policy Analysis,’ prepared for delivery at the 1987 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, The Palmer House, Chicago, September 3–6. Revised October 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1987). ‘Guidelines for Monitoring the Scientific Competence of Preventive Intervention Research Centers,’ Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 8: 389–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. and R. Westrum (1987). ‘Paradigms and Ferrets,’ Social Studies of Science 17: 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1975). ‘Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology,’ American Psychologist 30: 116–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • deNeufville, J. I. and S. E. Barton (1987). ‘Myths and the Definition of Policy Problems: An Exploration of Home Ownership and Public-Private Partnerships,’ Policy Sciences 20: 181–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dery, D. (1984). Problem Definition in Policy Analysis, Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W. N. (1988). ‘Methods of the Second Type: Coping With the Wilderness of Conventional Policy Analysis,’ unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.

  • Etheredge, L. S. (1985). Can Governments Learn? American Foreign Policy and the Central American Revolutions, New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, E. (1980). Politics, Values, and Public Policy: The Problem of Methodology, Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., S. Watson, and P. Hope (1984). ‘Defining Risk,’ Policy Sciences 17: 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelernter, D. (1989). ‘The Metamorphosis of Information Management,’ Scientific American (August): 66–73.

  • George, A. L. (1963). ‘Prediction of Political Action by Means of Propaganda Analysis,’ in N. W. Polsby, R. A. Dentler, and P. A. Smith, eds. Politics and Social Life, pp. 847–855. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. J. (1969). ‘Postwar Macroeconomics: The Evolution of Events and Ideas,’ in M. Feldstein, ed. The American Economy in Transition, pp. 101–162, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. S. (1971). ‘What Has Rand Wrought?’ Foreign Policy (Fall): 111–129.

  • Hempel, C. G. and P. Oppenheim (1969). ‘The Covering Law Analysis of Scientific Explanation,’ in L. I. Krimmerman, ed. The Nature and Scope of Social Science, pp. 54–68, New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. (1963). American Ethics and Public Policy, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1965). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupferberg, S. (1979). ‘Teaching the unteachable,’ The New Republic (April 14): 18–21.

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1941). Democracy Through Public Opinion. Menasha, Wis.: George Banta Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1943). ‘Personal Policy Objectives,’ unpublished memorandum, dated October 1, archived in Sterling Library, Yale University.

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1945). World Politics Faces Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1950). National Security and Individual Freedom. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1951a). ‘Democratic Character,’ in The Political Writings of Harold D. Lasswell, pp. 465–525, Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1951b). ‘The Policy Orientation,’ in D. Lerner and H. D. Lasswell, eds. The Policy Sciences, pp. 3–15, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1956a). The Decision Process: Seven Categories of Functional Analysis, College Park: Bureau of Governmental Research, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1956b), ‘The Political Science of Science: An Inquiry Into the Possible Reconciliation of Mastery and Freedom,’ American Political Science Review 50 (December): 961–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1966). ‘The World Revolution of Our Time: A Framework for Basic Policy Research,’ in H. D. Lasswell and D. Lerner, eds. World Revolutionary Elites, Ch. 2, pp. 29–96, Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1970a), ‘The Developing Science of Democracy,’ in The Analysis of Political Behavior, Ch. 1, pp. 1–12, Hamden, CT: Archon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1970b). ‘Must Science Serve Political Power?’ American Psychologist 25: 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1971a). The Policy Orientation of Political Science. Agra, India: Lakshmi Narain Agarwal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1971b). A Pre-View of Policy Sciences. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1977). ‘The Politics of Prevention,’ in Psychopathology and Politics, Ch. X, pp. 173–203, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. and A. Kaplan (1950). Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D., D. Lerner, and I. de S. Pool (1952). The Comparative Study of Symbols, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. (1982). ‘Academic Economics,’ Science (9 July): pp104–105.

  • Lewis, G. H. (1983). ‘The Day Care Tangle: Unexpected Outcomes When Programs Interact,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2: 531–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, W. (1965). Public Opinion, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukas, J. A. (1989). ‘Harvard's Kennedy School: Is Competence Enough?’ New York Times Magazine (March 12): 36f.

  • March, J. G. (1982). ‘Theories of Choice and Making Decisions’. Society (November/December): 29–39.

  • McCloskey, D. N. (1985). The Rhetoric of Economics, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNown, R. (1986). ‘On the Uses of Econometric Models: A Guide for Policy Makers’. Policy Sciences 19: 359–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. (1988). ‘What Sort of Ideas Become Public Ideas?’ in R. B. Reich, ed. The Power of Public Ideas, Ch. 3, pp. 55–83, Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, R. B. and J. A. Dixon (1986). ‘Pluralistic Policy Design: An Argument for Combining Economic and Coevolutionary Methodologies,’ Policy Sciences 19: 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, R. B. (1987). ‘Economics as Mechanics and the Demise of Biological Diversity,’ Ecological Modelling 38: 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. and W. M. Sullivan, eds. (1979). Interpretive Social Science: A Reader, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. A. (1979). ‘On Cognized Models,’ in his Ecology, Meaning, and Religion, pp. 97–144, Richmond, CA: North Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. (1988). ‘Introduction,’ in R. B. Reich, ed. The Power of Public Ideas, pp. 1–12, Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, V. F. (1956). ‘Dyfunctional Consequences of Performance Measures,’ Administrative Science Quarterly 1: 240–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin, A. M. (1984). ‘A Public Policy Paradox,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 4: 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, A. (1987). ‘Priorities in Space for the USA,’ Space Policy 3: 104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. A., N. J. Stevens, and L. G. Tornatzky (1982). ‘Policy Research and Analysis: An Empirical Profile, 1975–1980,’ Policy Sciences 15: 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1979). Generative Metaphor: ‘A Perspective on Problem-Setting in Social Policy,’ in A. Ortony, ed. Metaphors and Thought, pp. 254–283, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1957). ‘Rationality and Administrative Decision Making,’ in Models of Man, pp. 196–206, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1981). The Sciences of the Artificial, 2nd Ed. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1983). Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1985). ‘Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science,’ American Political Science Review 79: 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (1986). ‘Blind Spots in Policy Analysis: What Economics Doesn't Say About Energy Use,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5 (1986): 200–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, I. F. (1979). ‘I. F. Stone Breaks the Socrates Story,’ New York Times Magazine (April 8, 1979): 23f.

  • Sui, R. G. H. (1978). ‘Management and the Art of Chinese Baseball,’ Sloan Management Review 19: 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, L. C. (1977). ‘Economics, 1977,’ Daedalus 106: 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, D. (1985). ‘Contextual Orientation in Policy Analysis: The Contribution of Harold D. Lasswell,’ Policy Sciences 18: 241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, D. (1986). ‘Between Knowledge and Politics: Three Faces of Policy Analysis,’ Policy Sciences 19: 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, L. H. (1972). ‘Policy Science: Analysis or Ideology?’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 2: 66–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1985). ‘Swan Song,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 4: 573–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, G. (1987). Policymaking, Communication, and Social Learning. G. B. Adams, J. Forester, and B. L. Catron, eds. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, G. H. (1971). Explanation and Understanding, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1949). Max Weber on the Methodology of the Social Sciences, ed. and trans. by E. A. Shils and H. A. Finch, Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brunner, R.D. The policy movement as a policy problem. Policy Sci 24, 65–98 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146465

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146465

Keywords

Navigation