Abstract
A consumer-demand or subjective-value approach to valuing government health activities is recommended. The human-capital valuations generally used in cost-benefit analysis are unrelated to peoples' preferences and, therefore, irrelevant to political decisions. A number of important policy conclusions emerge from applying the suggested principle that government activities be valued on the basis of what people would be willing to pay for them: Beyond programs to aid the poor, government health efforts should be restricted to overcoming deficiencies in the operations of the private marketplace; that is, to regulatory actions, control of infectious disease and environmental pollution, and aid to biomedical research. Free services provided to the poor should be justified by the willingness of the nonpoor to pay for them. Thus, the preferences of the nonpoor are important in designing optimal poverty programs. Under present circumstances, direct money transfers to the poor seem preferable to further increases in poverty medical programs. The value of existing programs could be increased by giving more weight to what the poor want instead of what medical experts say is most important for their health.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dublin, L. I., and A. J. Lotka, The Money Value of a Man. New York: Ronald Press, 1946.
Fein, R., Economics of Mental Illness. New York: Basic Books, 1958.
Weisbrod, B. A., Economics of Public Health. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 1961.
Klarman, H. E., “Syphilis Control Programs,” in R. Dorfman, ed., Measuring Benefits of Government Investments, pp. 367–410. Studies of Government Finance. The Brookings Institution, April 1965.
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Program Coordination, “Disease Control Programs—Selected Disease Control Programs,” Program Analysis, September 1966, No. 1966–5.
Rice, D. P., Estimating the Cost of Illness, Health Economics Series Number 6, Public Health Service Publication No. 947-6. Washington, D.C., May 1966.
Mushkin, S. J., “Health as an Investment,” Journal of Political Economy, 70 (Part 2, Supp., October 1962), 129–157.
Wiseman, J., “Cost-Benefit Analysis and Health Service Policy,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 10 (February 1963), 128–145.
Feldman, P., Benefits and the Role of Government in a Market Economy. Institute for Defense Analyses, Washington, D.C., 8 March 1968 (mimeographed).
Schelling, T. C., “The Life You Save May Be Your Own.” Proceedings of the Second Conference on Government Expenditures, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. (15–16 September), 1966, pp. 127–176.
Downs, A., An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros., 1957.
Buchanan, J., and G. Tullock, The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press, 1962.
Lindblom, C. E., The Intelligence of Democracy; Decision Making Through Mutual Adjustment. New York: Free Press, 1965.
Haynes, G., The Senate of the United States, Vol. 1. New York: Russell & Russell, 1960.
Williams, J. D., Comments on Automobile Traffic. The Rand Corporation, P-1556, 24 November 1958.
Report of the National Advisory Commission on Health Manpower, Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, November 1967.
McDermott, W., “Modern Medicine and the Demographic/Disease Pattern of Overly-Traditional Societies: A Technologic Misfit.” Presented at the Institute on International Medical Education of the Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, D.C., 28 March 1966.
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of the Assistant Secretary (Planning and Evaluation), “Delivery of Health Services for the Poor—Human Invest- ment Programs,” Program Analysis, No. 1967-12, December 1967.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The people who have assisted in the preparation of this paper are truly too numerous to mention in total. I am particularly indebted to Ed Park and Jim DeHaven of Rand for their helpful discussions, to Paul Feldman of the Institute for Defense Analysis for ideas, stimulation, and encouragement, and to Dick Zeckhauser of Harvard for his perceptive comments on an earlier draft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, V. How much is good health worth?. Policy Sci 1, 49–72 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145192
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145192