Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prenatal care and prevention of preterm birth

A case-control study in southern Spain

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The value of prenatal care is controversial and difficult to establish. A national policy for improving perinatal outcomes was proposed and applied throughout Andalusia (Southern Spain) in 1984. Here we report the results of an evaluation of this health care program as regards the prevention of preterm delivery. Effectiveness of prenatal care was assessed on the basis of two case-control studies in a hospital setting: one performed before the program was implemented (1981–1982) and the second one six years after the program began (1990–1993). A total of 229 cases and 395 controls for the period 1981–1982, and 207 cases and 381 controls for 1990–1993 were selected. Prenatal care was assessed based on the number of prenatal care visits, the date of the first visit, and an American composite index adjusting for gestational age. Multiple-factor adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression analysis. The use of prenatal care significantly improved across time: the proportion of women receiving no prenatal care decreased from over 30% to less than 5%, and the proportion of women starting prenatal care in the first trimester for 1990–1993 was three times greater than the figure for 1981–1982. In the 1981–1982 case-control study, the date of first visit and the composite index were shown to be unrelated to preterm birth risk; and the number of visits yielded a significant association, although no definite trend could be established. In the 1990–1993 case-control study, a clear and significant relationship was observed between the number of prenatal care visits, the trimester of the first visit, and the adequacy of care according to the composite index. This latter variable, reflecting a more stringent standard of prenatal care, was selected by a stepwise logistic regression analysis as the best predictor for preterm birth risk. The results suggest that the present Andalusian program helps prevent preterm delivery. Nonetheless, its minimum standards should be raised to further decrease preterm birth risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldenberg RL, Davis RO, Copper RL, Corliss D, Andrews J, Carpenter A. The Alabama preterm birth prevention project. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 933–939.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hall M, Chang P, MacGillivry I. Is routine antenatal care worthwhile? Lancet 1980 (ii): 78–80.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Terris M, Glasser M. A life table analysis of the relation of the prenatal care to prematurity. Am J Public Health 1974; 64: 869–275.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Malloy MH, Kao TC, Lee YJ. Analyzing the effect of prenatal care on pregnancy outcome: A conditional approach. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 448–450.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moore T, Origel W, Key T, Resnik R. The perinatal and economic impact of prenatal care in low socio-economic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balcazar H, Cole G, Hartner J. Mexican Americans' use of prenatal care and its relationship to maternal risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Am J Prev Med 1992; 8: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blondel B, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ. An indicator of adverse pregnancy outcome in France: Not receiving maternity benefits. J Epidemiol Community Health 1991; 45: 211–215.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buescher P, Meis P, Ernest J, Moore M, Michielutte R, Sharp P. A comparison of women in and out of a prematurity prevention project in a North Carolina perinatal care region. Am J Public Health 1988; 78: 264–267.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Buescher PA, Roth MS, Williams D, Goforth CM. An evaluation of the impact of maternity care coordination on Medicaid birth outcomes in North Carolina. Am J Public Health 1991; 81: 1625–1629.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dyson D, Crites Y, Ray D, Armstrong MA. Prevention of preterm birth in high-risk patients: The role of education and provider contact versus home uterine monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 756–762.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hobel CJ, Ross MG, Bemis RL, Bragonier JR, Nessim S, Sandhu M, Bear MB, Mori B. The West Los Angeles Preterm Birth Prevention Project, I: Program impact on high-risk women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mavalankar D, Gray R, Trivedi C. Risk factors for preterm and term low birthweight in Ahmedabad, India. Int J Epidem 1992; 21: 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Papiernik E, Bouyer J, Dreyfus J, Collin D, Winisdorffer G, Gueguen S, Lecomte M, Lazar P. Prevention of preterm births: A perinatal study in Haguenau, France. Pediatrics 1985; 76: 154–158.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peoples-Sheps M, Siegel E, Suchindran C, Origasa H, Ware A, Barakat A. Characteristics of maternal employment during pregnancy: Effects on low birthweight. Am J Public Health 1991; 81: 1007–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scholl TO, Miller LK, Salmon RW, Cofsky M, Shearer J. Prenatal care adequacy and the outcome of adolescent pregnancy: Effects on weight gain, preterm delivery, and birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 312–316.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Collaborative Group on Preterm Birth Prevention. Multicenter randomized, controlled trial of a preterm birth prevention program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 352–366.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Feldman JG, Minkoff HL, McCalla S, Salwen M. A cohort study of the impact of perinatal drug use on prematurity in an inner city population. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 726–728.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heinz HC, Nance NW, McCarthy BJ, Efird M. A randomized trial of nurse-midwifery prenatal care to reduce low birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 341–345.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Konte JM, Creasy RK, Laros RK. California north coast preterm birth prevention project. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 727–730.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Macquart-Moulin G, Baret C, Julian C, Fancello G, Vincent A, Aymé S. Surveillance anténatale et risques de prématurité et d'hypotrophie foetale. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1992; 21: 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Main DM, Gabbe SG, Richardson D, Strong S. Can preterm deliveries be prevented? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 892–898.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mueller-Heubach E, Reddick D, Barnett B, Bente R. Preterm birth prevention: Evaluation of a prospective controlled randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1172–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull Wlrd Health Org 1987; 65: 663–757.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Servicio Andaluz de Salud (Dirección General de Atención Primaria y Orinicuín de la Salud). Asistencia Obstétrica en Atención Primaria. Sevilla: Consejería de Salud de la Junta de Andalucía. Servicio Andaluz de Salud, 1987.

  25. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Movimiento Natural de la Problación Española 1981–1988. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Alexander GR, Comely DA. Prenatal care utilization: Its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome. Am J Prev Med 1987; 3: 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alexander G, Tompkins M, Petersen D, Weiss J. Source of bias in prenatal care utilization indices: Implications for evaluating the medical expansion. Am J Public Health 1991; 81: 1013–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dixon WJ (ed). BMDP Statistical Software Manual, Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tyson J, Guzick D, Rosenfeld CR, Lasky R, Gant, Jiminez J, Heartwell S. Prenatal care evaluation and cohort analysis. Pediatrics 1990; 85: 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kogan MD, Kotelchuk M, Alexander GR, Johnson WE. Racial disparities in reported prenatal care advice from health care providers. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 82–88.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hansell MJ. Sociodemographic factors and the quality of prenatal care. Am J Public Health 1991; 81: 1023–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kogan MD, Kotelchuk M, Alexander GR, Nagey DA. Relation of the content of prenatal care to the risk of low birth weight: Maternal reports of health behavior advice and initial prenatal care procedures. JAMA 1994; 271: 1340–1345.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Peoples-Sheps M, Kalsbeck WD, Siegel E, Dewees C, Rogers M, Schwartz R. Prenatal records: A national survey of content. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 514–521.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Main DM, Richardson D, Gabbe SG, Strong S, Weller S. Prospective evaluation of a risk scoring system for predicting preterm delivery in black inner city women. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Buescher PA, Smith C, Holliday JL, Levine RH. Source of prenatal care and infant birthweight: The case of a North Carolina county. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 204–210.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Andersen HF, Freda MC, Damus K, Brustman L, Merkatz I. Effectiveness of patient education to reduce preterm delivery among ordinary risk patients. Am J Perinat 1989; 6: 214–216.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Miguel Delgado-Rodriguez

    Present address: Division of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada School of Medicine, Granada, Spain

    Montserrat Gómez-Olmedo, Miguel Delgado-Rodriguez, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas & Ramón Gálvez-Vargas

  2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Granada School of Medicine, Granada, Spain

    Juan Antonio Molina-Font

Authors
  1. Montserrat Gómez-Olmedo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel Delgado-Rodriguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juan Antonio Molina-Font
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ramón Gálvez-Vargas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gómez-Olmedo, M., Delgado-Rodriguez, M., Bueno-Cavanillas, A. et al. Prenatal care and prevention of preterm birth. Eur J Epidemiol 12, 37–44 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144426

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144426

Key words

Search

Navigation